TL;DR

  • Users who have rooted their phone, have their bootloader unlocked or are using some custom ROMs report that their RCS messages are not being sent, even though RCS shows them as connected.
  • The Google Messages app does not show any error messages when blocking RCS messages of these users and does not send the messages out as SMS or MMS either.
  • Google famously campaigned for Apple to include RCS messaging in iMessage but is now blocking it for certain Android users.
  • mox@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    It’s apparently the Google Messages app, not Android itself. Good to know.

    • noodlejetski@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      it’s the only OEM-independent, RCS-compatible app for now, so it’s not like you can work around it by installing another client.

      • mox@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 months ago

        It suggests that apps without this problem can be developed, which means more paths to a workaround than if we had to modify the operating system.

          • mox@lemmy.sdf.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            8 months ago

            How is Google going to stop them?

            Forbidding an app from the Play Store is unlikely to stop these users, who already use rooted devices and custom ROMs. They’ll just get an app from their ROM provider, F-Droid, or elsewhere.

            Does RCS depend on Google services integrated with the mobile network operator? If Google tried to use that position to forbid alternative apps, it would seem likely to run afoul of the Digital Markets Act.

            I don’t know a lot about RCS specifically, though. Is there another issue I haven’t considered?

            • smileyhead@discuss.tchncs.de
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              8 months ago

              Using RCS requires low level access to phone’s modem. You won’t get it on Android. Google is bypassing it’s own restriction by using proxy servers while having the deal with phone operators.

              • mox@lemmy.sdf.org
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                8 months ago

                You won’t get it on Android

                Why do you say that? Custom ROMs already get low level access to the same hardware that official ROMs get. Is there some reason to think it would be different in this case?

                • smileyhead@discuss.tchncs.de
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  8 months ago

                  This basically means adding the feature ourselfs and making our own build, not something we can name Android to give low level access to RCS in modem. This is feature we will just add.

                  Also on the side note, while in theory possible it will be a pain. We can’t just reinstall one package like modemmanger on typical Linux system, we must make a whole new builds for every device and apply patches again on every major Android update. While modem manufacturers do not even share documentation for them, just share a proprietary Android driver that should be in OEM system. So adding such feature means big reverse engeeniring, big effort for automatic patch and build system, all to support in my opinion already outdated and useless protocol which because it is already obsolete with standard XMPP or Matrix based apps.

            • noodlejetski@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              8 months ago

              How is Google going to stop them?

              well, so far none of the third party SMS apps have implemented RCS support, and when asked, every developer replies that they need Google to open their standard for other clients to use, so I guess they’ve been doing a pretty good job at stopping everyone else.

              • Draconic NEO@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                8 months ago

                Have they given a reason why the specifically not able to do it, or do they just not want to do it because it’s “unlicensed” or “out of spec” if it’s just the second option then it’s a problem of having unwilling people and not a real entry barrier.

                If there’s an actual barrier to developing something like that it’s important to understand what it is.

                • noodlejetski@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  8 months ago

                  Have they given a reason why the specifically not able to do it

                  yes, every time the reason given was Google not opening their API to the public.

  • Zak@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    I think after XMPP, Google Talk, Wave, Hangouts, Allo, etc… people should know better than to adopt a messaging service from Google.

    Yes, I know RCS is theoretically an open standard, but if Google can keep me from using it, it effectively belongs to Google.

    • Pantsofmagic@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      It’s worse than that. Carriers have a say as well. For example, Samsung messages works with RCS in some markets but US providers currently lock it out. They only allow Google messages for RCS. Absolutely infuriating.

      • EngineerGaming@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 months ago

        Not only for its time! While flawed, I still see it as probably the best middle ground for messaging. It has evolved since then, its servers are easy to host and it has a variety of clients that support e2e.

        • recapitated@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          8 months ago

          Yeah I was using ejabberd around 2006 to connect some high touch clients, and it certainly got the job done.

        • soulfirethewolf@lemdro.id
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          8 months ago

          Yeah, but I think that most of the clients are a bit dated in UX otherwise. There isn’t really anything that I could suggest a friend to use

    • cum@lemmy.cafe
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      Yeah hard to call it an open standard when there’s a single implementation that’s closed source and goes off of spec.

    • Kilgore Trout@feddit.it
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      RCS is monopolised by Google. Theoretically open (“maybe, in the future, once it’s secure…”), but practically not.

  • kratoz29@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    Good thing nobody uses sms to chat here where I live…

    The bad thing is that Whatsapp is the alternative.

    • CrayonRosary@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      The thing is, RCS isn’t SMS. That’s kind of the point. RCS is a replacement for SMS. The two protocols just happen to be available in the same Messages app. It’s like sticking WhatsApp inside Messages, except it’s a different protocol.

      • kratoz29@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        Oh I get it, but well, my point still stands, nobody here uses the stock messaging app, which can send SMS.

        Which is partly good, as iMessage is not predominant here either.

    • nossaquesapao@lemmy.eco.br
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      Same here… whatsapp became so widespread, that even governmental agencies and private businesses use it for official communication.

      • kratoz29@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 months ago

        That is what blew my mind indeed, and as someone who hates constantly dialing companies and such for minor crap, I kinda am glad they went this way lol.

    • aard@kyu.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      RCS is just stupid. When I was still building phones a decade ago we had some operators ask for it - but after reading the standards decided to just ignore it and hope it passes. Pretty much everybody did that, until google got interested - presumably because they figured it’d be a good way to get control of messaging on a lower level. As that’s exactly what RCS is: control of messaging, and ideally the option to charge for it, just like SMS and MMS before that.

      • Zak@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 months ago

        What’s really bizarre is that Google had the chance to be a dominant player in messaging when they made Hangouts the default SMS client on Android. Instead, they backpedaled and let Hangouts wither into obscurity. I’m mostly glad they screwed that up, but also puzzled.

          • Joe Cool@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            8 months ago

            Hangouts/Google Talk was great when they had federation and allowed 3rd party clients. After they locked that it went to shit.

            • AtmaJnana@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              8 months ago

              I miss the golden age when we had AIM, ICQ, or GoogleTalk, etc all on the client of our choosing.

    • xcjs@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      With UI decisions like the shortcut bar, they really don’t. I switched to another SMS app because I couldn’t stand it.

  • narc0tic_bird@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    Quite ironic given that they cried because Apple didn’t adopt RCS on iOS, and now they make it less accessible themselves.

  • Shdwdrgn@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    Any idea how long this has been going on? I have an unlocked bootloader but am running a standard upgrade version on my phone and it was never rooted. Some time in the last few months I started getting warnings that my texts weren’t going through and was asked if I wanted to switch to SMS… yeah ok I’d never heard of RCS before so yes please use SMS for all of my messages, and everything worked fine.

    • Evilcoleslaw@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      Supposedly this isn’t doing any warning or asking to fall back. The messages just fail silently. I’d root and use the play integrity hider magisk module.

  • 0oWow@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    I’ve disabled it for now. Rooted phone is enormously more valuable to me than RCS that only half works right to begin with.

    • SharkAttak@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      Yep. Sadly WhatsApp is the standard now… I’d like to go back to something neutral like SMS, but not if they pull this shit.

    • moitoi@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      You can just install the PlayIntegrityFix module. It works again.

      Google doing shit and it’s fine to circumvent it.

    • TonyOstrich@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      I was able to get RCS working again yesterday by updating to the latest version of Play Integrity Fix, but if that hadn’t worked, I would have disabled it and then probably switched over to Textra or Yatta for texting since RCS is basically the only thing keeping me on messages for texting.

      • Joe Cool@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 months ago

        I have it disabled anyways along with the Carrier Services app. Guess what: my battery life improved dramatically.

  • KrapKake@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    I knew it! I had the sneaking suspicion that this was the case. About a month ago I updated my phone to Android 14 (custom rom) and noticed I started having trouble with RCS after a couple days since the update. I knew I was going to lose the play integrity but whatever. RCS was nice but I will not bend… just pushing me a step further to de-googling my phone. Lol it’s funny how they cry to Apple about supporting RCS but yet refuse to allow third party apps or phones that don’t meet their requirements, pathetic. There should be an encrypted text communication standard that isn’t controlled by one company who can lock you out because you don’t have approved software, that is ridiculous. That being said, I wish Signal was still a SMS app.

    • EngineerGaming@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      There should be an encrypted text communication standard that isn’t controlled by one company who can lock you out because you don’t have approved software

      XMPP + OMEMO

        • EngineerGaming@feddit.nl
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          8 months ago

          That too, but it is more resource-hungry to host (my biggest problem is that I have very limited storage and haven’t quite figured out how to disable media downloads from all rooms). But yea, indeed still an option.

            • Ohh@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              8 months ago

              I think the conduite server should be very lightweight, secure and easy to set up. But it’s leaking video

      • JasonDJ@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 months ago

        Great example since Google essentially hijacked XMPP and took it into a fully-intentional nosedive.

      • KrapKake@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 months ago

        Needs to be something like family is going to use you see. Which is why I liked what Signal had since it doubled as SMS.

    • thorbot@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      You should have De googled a long time ago, they always pull this kind of shit

      • KrapKake@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 months ago

        I agree but there’s 2 apps there is no good alternative for and they are paid, at least one of them I am learning Android studio + Kotlin to recreate it. The other I have found Wx which is OK but besides that there is no good advanced weather radar.

          • KrapKake@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            8 months ago

            Yea tried that already, one won’t work at all and one will stop working after sometime. I assume it still has something to do with google services. I have not tried with microg. Either way… I’ll get there to google-free land eventually its a work in progress. Sometimes I do consider just ripping off the band-aid and installing raw lineage os then learn to deal with it from there.

  • Euphorazine@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    This just sounds like another “Google is slowing down Firefox” thing where everyone’s source was a reddit post and didn’t even turn out to be accurate

    • Cris@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      It didn’t? Last I heard google responded that it was an attempt to delay video loading for adblock users which seemed to most to be a transparent excuse. I haven’t followed it closely though, I’d be curious to know more if there’s an update

      • Euphorazine@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        Verge article where the claim is due to ad blocker mitigation and not browser specific.

        You said that you heard it was ad blocker related too. So the initial wave of reports about it being Firefox was inaccurate. Every article about it all sourced a singular reddit post. Just some social media “journalism”.

        Anecdotally, which I understand is not a great measure, I didn’t experience this when it was first being reported on. But I pay for YouTube premium, so maybe that’s a difference too

    • JasonDJ@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      Nobody who cares about RCS cares about the bubble color.

      People who care about the bubble color are tech-illiterate Apple fanbois.

      People who care about RCS care about being able to send high-resolution photos, group chats, and video calls with their tech-illiterate Apple fanboi friends and family in a default, common messaging app.

      Also the non-fanboi Apple users, and the tech-literate Apple users, and the Android users. All in one default app and an open standard. Amazing.

      • BorgDrone@lemmy.one
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 months ago

        open standard.

        Which is why it’s such a mess. The RCS standard is defined by the GSM association, an organization with well over a thousand members. Want to add a feature to RCS? Prepare for years of bureaucracy trying to get the standard amended. Then 750+ mobile operators worldwide need to upgrade their systems, adding at least another few years.

        Meanwhile when Apple wants to add a feature they can just roll it out in the next iOS release.

        • JasonDJ@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          8 months ago

          And that’s totally fine.

          It runs over IP and it’s designed in a way that allows implementers to have their own adaptations within their walled garden, like End to End encryption in Google messages.

          Also important to note that Apple is not discontinuing iMessage as a result of supporting RCS. In fact, if I were a betting man, I’d imagine that within the next 5-10 years, Apple will either be moving iMessage to RCS, or to some other common platform along with the rest of the industry. It’s just not going to be worth their effort to maintain and update iMessage while also maintaining compatibility with RCS. They may even make improvements to the standard that allow them to make more features within a walled garden.

          iMessage is legit the only thing tying me to iPhone. My wife and her family just can’t be bothered to use any third party apps (except Facebook Messenger for a couple of them, and I downright refuse to use that). So, as we exchange pictures and video a lot, it’s just easier.

          Apples real secret sauce is its tight vertical integration between software and hardware. Because they have full control over both, they can squeeze out a ton of optimizations for a very limited selection of hardware. How that software interacts further up the stack…I think Apple will eventually realize that that juice isn’t worth the squeeze.

          Edit: proofreading and realizing that both the Apple puns were completely unintentional.

    • rmuk@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      E2EE, unlimited attachment sizes, rich formatting, read/delivered notifications, reactions, group chat, stickers, a third-party app integration, stuff I’m forgetting about, and all part of the standard Messaging app.