• hperrin@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    Fax machines. Phone lines are pretty private, and sending a fax is usually more secure than emailing something, especially if someone else manages your email.

    • Willard@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Counterpoint, fax is not encrypted and wire taps are very easy. At least e-mail can be encrypted so Joe shmoe on the street can’t see it.

      Besides, all faxing these days is going through VOIP and computers anyways.

      • hperrin@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        Having to physically wire tap the phone line is a lot more difficult and requires local bad actors. Email’s exposure to the internet makes it easier to hack. Yes, email can be encrypted, but if your server is compromised, that doesn’t matter. End to end encryption for email is much harder, and isn’t really used by any institutions (and usually can’t be because of data retention regulations), so the server has complete access to the unencrypted email in almost all cases. Compromising a fax machine that isn’t connected to the internet is a lot harder.

        Not all faxes go through VoIP. Your everyday home fax machine probably uses VoIP, because having a landline installed in your home is stupid expensive and unnecessary, but faxes in institutions probably use the PSTN. These institutions most likely need landlines anyway, so having a dedicated fax line makes a lot more sense.

        And if a fax goes through VoIP, it’ll be encrypted the same way email is. So in that case, it’s the same level of security as email, which is to say, easier to compromise. At least you can’t trick someone into clicking a link in a fax though.

        • WhyJiffie@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          you can choose whatever email provider you trust, and then they apply encryption on the transport level. but there is often very few phone companies, and zero encryption. they don’t have to install any kind of wiretaps, they can just record everything automatically that passes through

        • BCsven@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          Proton mail is encrypted on the server with your key and proton does not have access to it. If you lose your login credentials and have to reset then you lose your old email because that key is not getting recovered.

          • hperrin@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 months ago

            The email comes into their server unencrypted. They promise that they will encrypt it for you, though. Of course, you’re also relying on the sending server to keep the message secure as well.

            • BCsven@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              2 months ago

              Proton Mail’s end-to-end encryption and zero-access encryption ensure only you can see your emails. Not even Proton can view the content of your emails and attachments.

              • hperrin@lemmy.ca
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                edit-2
                2 months ago

                The vast majority of senders do not send email using end to end encryption. If you’re sending an email from a PM address to another PM address, sure, it’s end to end encrypted. If you’re sending to another service, it’s not end to end encrypted unless you’ve both gone through the painful steps of setting up PGP encryption. Same as if you’re receiving from another service.

                You can read about it here:

                https://proton.me/support/proton-mail-encryption-explained

                So that quote you just responded with is saying exactly what I had just said above it. They promise that they’ll encrypt that unencrypted email that just came into their server for you. And they promise that they’ll encrypt that unencrypted email you just sent outside their service.

                • BCsven@lemmy.ca
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  2 months ago

                  I know, but I was answering the question about encryption, rather than users. Proton also allows sending encrypted to non participating receivers. They get a weblink and have to open it to view the email a with password if supplied. That decrypts the email at the browser, and has an expiry time on the link.

  • NahMarcas@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    Wii console: remote controler plus informatic knowledge make this a trustfull smartTV

    • unbanshee@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      …how are trains obsolete to anybody?

      Hundred of billions of tonnes of freight are moved by rail each year globally, and people travel hundreds of billions of kilometers by rail.

  • BillTheTailor@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    Developers. Yes, AI can sling a lot of code, but it can’t make business decisions and it can’t please a difficult customer.

    • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      Honestly, developers shouldn’t be the front line for that if you’re medium-sized or bigger anyway.

      It’s even simpler: AI can’t really even begin with architecting, and will stubbornly defend nonsense code 5% of the time when you need >99% correctness for the thing to run at a basic level.

  • weeeeum@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    Handtools in woodworking. There are some people who refuse use a tool without a cord.

  • zephiriz@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    Safty razors! Why would anyone spend 20$ on the new fangled 30 million blade razor that mighy last one shave? When you can spend pennies even if you change blades every shave.

    • ohhmyygott@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Switched to a safety razor recently after years of using Gillette’s… It’s life changing! No more bumps or breaking out. Also it’s cheap!

      • zer0@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        Electric and safety razors don’t necessarily serve the same purpose. An electric razor can never cut as close to to the skin as a safety razor. I use both

    • Christian@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      At some point about a decade ago I realized I’m much happier just paying the extra $8 every couple months when I go to get a haircut and otherwise just letting it grow out.

    • Wahots@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      I recently switched to a Leaf one and love it. It’s about the same as my Harry’s razor, but a hell of a lot less expensive when even Costco is selling their reloads at $27. The leaf blades are way less expensive, and they aren’t even proprietary.

    • M137@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      Safety* $20* newfangled* might*

      It’s like you consciously added misspellings and bad grammar.

  • Dizzy Devil Ducky@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    I’d probably say something like my Sony Discman or any other CD player, if we’re talking the general public. CDs aren’t anywhere near as popular as they used to be thanks to streaming, but if you’re collecting like I am, a dedicated CD player is a necessity.

      • Dizzy Devil Ducky@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        The first ever concert I ever went to November of last year I got super lucky. Headliner band, a local hometown Rock group, had a few different CDs for merch sales. All the other acts had vinyl if they were selling their music on physical media, which was a real bummer because I would have totally gotten a CD from one of the other acts I really liked.

        I’ve also been seeing vinyl at walmart any time I am unfortunate enough to have to go there. It doesn’t feel right. Totally agree on the space thing since I can currently fit all my CDs (for now) in a small drawer in my desk but would absolutely struggle to fit vinyl just about anywhere on/in my desk without it sticking out like a sore thumb.

    • moakley@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      I hate that music nowadays is supposed to go through my phone. I’m on my phone constantly. It’s ridiculous that I can’t do that while listening to music. A dedicated music player is essential.

      Although I eventually gave up on CDs and now I just use an old phone.

    • Bloomcole@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Those impracticaly large fragile things, failing in cars with the slightest shock? Never cared for them.
      Casettes you could throw around, tape them if necessary.
      Later minidisc for a short time and digital mp3/flac… So no thank you, like DVD’s spoiling plenty of movies by giving up in the middle due to a tiny scratch these things were a mistake.