Summary

A new AP-NORC poll shows that Americans’ confidence in air travel has declined after several fatal plane crashes in 2025.

Only 64% now believe flying is safe, down from 71% last year, while the number of those who feel it is unsafe rose by 12%.

Confidence in pilots, air traffic controllers, and the federal government has also dropped. Recent crashes, including a deadly collision over Washington, D.C., have fueled public concern.

Meanwhile, Trump has begun firing hundreds of FAA employees, raising further safety worries.

  • Tezzerets_Tea_Time@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    24 hours ago

    So weird that it’s only fallen 7% considering before January 2025 we hadn’t had a fatal plane crash in almost 16 years, and now we’ve had multiple in a month.

  • Raiderkev@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    24 hours ago

    I’m not flying anywhere while the orange turd is in office. Fuck it, less money for the economy I guess. U wanna fire air traffic controllers while there is an active shortage? Planes crashing left and right ever since. Hard pass.

  • dan@upvote.au
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    Flying is still the safest form of transport.

    There’s 1.17 deaths and 42 injuries per 100 million miles travelled by car. In comparison, there’s only 0.007 injuries per 100 million miles flown in commercial planes. Even trains are more dangerous at 0.1 injuries per 100 million miles.

    You’re far, far more likely to be in a car crash on your way to the airport compared to being involved in a plane crash.

    • 9488fcea02a9@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 day ago

      Dying in a car crash takes so many forms. Instantly crushed by a truck? Or die slowly in the hospital?

      But i imagine dying in an airplane almost always involves 20mins of sheer terror as you plummet towards the earth knowing that you will die, or if you might survive and be floating in the ocean for days.

      • dan@upvote.au
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 day ago

        Of course they’re pre 2025… It’s only February so there’s no full year stats for 2025 yet.

    • Fedizen@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 day ago

      These stats reflect years of institutional intervention from the FAA and NTSB. With alterations to those regulators its unlikely these stats will continue to be relevant.

      • dan@upvote.au
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        Even if flying gets a bit less safe, there would have to be far, far more plane crashes (at least three orders of magnitude more) for it to become anywhere near as dangerous as driving.

      • Suburbanl3g3nd@lemmings.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 day ago

        It also ignores how hard it is to be a pilot or a train conductor vs driving a car around town. Got an easy to obtain license and some cash and you’re golden. Try to do that with a plane or train. Takes some serious education in comparison

        • dan@upvote.au
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 day ago

          This is a reason why people should feel safer taking a plane or train, which is my point.

    • buddascrayon@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 day ago

      This is funny to me because the amount of commerce in the U.S. that is dependent on reliable air travel for average Americans is massive. If people stop flying the economy is going to be what ends up in freefall.

    • rumba@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 day ago

      The odds are still greatly in your favor, there’s little to worry about.

      That said, the odds are now drastically worse than they were prior.

  • RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 days ago

    I really don’t think we hold any industry to the superhuman standards we hold aviation to.

    The only other industry that individuals entrust their lives to in large numbers that I can think of is the medical industry, and that kills around 100k people a year, yet people don’t quit seeking treatment en masse (problems with US medical system access and affordability aside).

    Pilots are tested at least yearly with simulators dealing with emergencies of all sorts, from fires to engine failures, education and reviews of aircraft systems and aviation regulations, along with medical examinations and random drug testing to continually check fitness for flight. Cabin crew also see yearly testing dealing with emergencies, medical or things like fires in the cabin, evacuations, along with training on how to deal with passengers who may be drunk or a threat in some way.

    The best time to fly is after incidents. Everyone is on high alert, training departments and unions remind crews to take extra care in their duties, all crews are aware of extra scrutiny.

    • booly@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 day ago

      You’re mostly right, but your comment also assumes independent probabilities rather than correlated probabilities of danger. Sometimes multiple crashes can trace back to the same cause: one particular manufacturing defect on a model of aircraft sold thousands of times, one bad practice on air traffic control procedure, one bad actor targeting multiple aircraft, etc.

      Purely hypothetically, as an example, if it turned out that there was a terrorist group targeting aircraft via anti aircraft missiles, then that group’s success at bringing down an airliner would actually worsen the odds of passengers on other aircraft, at least until we receive external information that the threat has passed.

        • booly@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          15 hours ago

          Exactly. Some of the fears that people have are about factors that affect all flights, not just the risk of a single pilot operating a single aircraft.

          Flying is still safe and has a strong safety culture built into the industry independent of government regulation, that wouldn’t change overnight even if the government regulators change. But removing a slice of Swiss cheese is still bad, and cause for concern.

    • rayyy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 day ago

      The best time to fly is after incidents.

      That used to be good advice. The best time to fly now is before planes started falling out of the sky.

    • nova_ad_vitum@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 day ago

      Reminds me of that guy who deliberately books vacations to places that have just suffered terrorist attacks. Cheap as fuck and super safe since there are security forces everywhere. Not sure I agree with the practice, but can’t really fault the logic.

      • RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 day ago

        Yep, that’s pretty similar. Might be a good travel idea, but one would have to take care regarding any issue that the locals might have with foreigners after tragedies in their communities.

  • bitjunkie@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 days ago

    I’m not flying until this gets sorted out. The fact that we elected a fucking Russian saboteur twice is just incomprehensible. NPVIC might save us in the nick of time, but I doubt it.

  • thingAmaBob@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 days ago

    I just wish traveling were a more pleasant experience in general. I gotta take an extra day off after coming back home because modes of travel in USA are so exhausting.

    • rumba@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 day ago

      Yeah, it’s pretty horrible you have to fly first class to lay back any substantial amount. Even business class just gives you more ass room. I also wish they would run the cabins at a bit higher pressure. I can never seem to get used to that 10,000ft standard.

      I should probably move to Colorado for a couple months, I hear once you get conditioned to altitude you don’t have problems with it anymore

      • dan@upvote.au
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 day ago

        I can never seem to get used to that 10,000ft standard.

        The standard is 8,000 feet, not 10,000. Some planes, like the Boeing 787, are pressurized to 6,000ft instead.

  • werefreeatlast@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 days ago

    They should have the crash chance on the departures/arrivals screen… Ohio… 7:56am on time 67%. On boarding, Sanf Francisco 4:25pm delayed 75%.

  • ArchRecord@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 days ago

    Quick everyone, start talking about high speed rail!

    Maybe we have the slightest shot of actually building out, y’know, cheap, fast, effective mass transit for once?

    • dan@upvote.au
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 day ago

      Too bad the California high-speed rail project is being threatened by President Musk.

    • skuzz@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 days ago

      Not as long as the cargo railroad companies hold all the power. America needs an alternate timeline with no fascism, sane governance, and making all railroads public.

      • frezik@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 day ago

        You wouldn’t build high speed rail on cargo lines, anyway. New rail corridors need to be established. The LA-Vegas line is being built along an existing interstate, which solves a lot of right-of-way and land usage issues. That’s what you want to do.

    • Amon@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 days ago

      Elon is in power and has too much money shame him into building hyperloop finally

      • Ultraviolet@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        He never intended to build the Hyperloop. From the start, it was a lie to shut down a proposed project to build a west coast high speed rail line.

        • evasive_chimpanzee@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 day ago

          Yeah, and it can be defeated with elementary school level math, so anyone in government who agreed to fund it should be brought back to school (though they are probably just more corrupt than stupid).

          Everyone in the industry tries to focus on how fast a hyperloop can go, and tries to keep any criticism focused on the engineering challenges (and to be clear, there are many, many engineering and safety challenges).

          It should never be discussed as “LA to the Bay in X minutes”, it needs to be discussed in terms of passengers per hour.

          Given that these vehicles travel very fast, passengers will need to remain seated while the vehicle is in motion. Let’s pretend that the occupants of each vehicle are capable of leaving the vehicle with their luggage in under the FAA’s targeted evacuation time of 90 seconds (even though luggage makes it take like 10x that). That’s 40 loads per hour, and let’s be generous and say they fit 40 people, that’s 1600 people per hour.

          That puts it on par with a lane of car traffic. Maybe you can squeeze some more people in there, or really crack a whip to get people out quick, but you won’t be able to get to a fraction of the passengers per hour of high speed rail at ~20,000.

          When you actually do calculations with all the other factors, you get ~350 passengers per hour.

  • catloaf@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 days ago

    Does this mean airlines are going to drop prices to drive tickets sales? Because I’m due for a vacation…

    • m4xie@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 days ago

      No, they’re going to demand government handouts, then spend it on stock buybacks and executive bonuses. Then demand more government money.

  • Atomicbunnies@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 days ago

    I am a aircraft mechanic and I can tell you most of us take our jobs very seriously. Those that dont, don’t get put on the bigger jobs. We take our job very seriously. Air travel is safe. I am extremely careful with my job. I always think about safety and how what I’m doing effects folks.

    • drekloge@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 days ago

      It’s not that you don’t take your job seriously, it’s that the same amount of work still needs to be done with less people and less oversight. People get tired. People make mistakes when they’re tired and overworked.