• TheAnonymouseJoker@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    MiXplorer, Solid Explorer or Material Files

    (in order of power user needs + features -----> ease of use)

    MiXplorer on XDA is king.

  • BustinJiber@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    file - downloads

    me: /storage/emulated/0/Android/data/org.mozilla.firefox/files/Download or /storage/3564-3130/Android/data/org.mozilla.firefox/files/Download here I come!

  • gigachad@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    It’s pretty relatable. A lot of apps like to use their own folders, like my lemmy app.
    If I download files from my banking app they get saved to root (sdcard), most others save to my Download folder. Then there is DCIM where I have photos, but Telegram does not care, for Signal I have to export each file to the file system seperately.

    The worst thing though is that the files in Downloads/ are ordered A-Z by default. No idea if this is a LineageOS thing, but it drives me crazy.

      • dev_null@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        It’s an emulated FAT SD card for compatibility. Android uses a Linux file system with file permissions and modern features, but exposes it as a fake (emulated) FAT SD card.

  • Sagrotan@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Never had the problem, strange. Using Total Commander as file manager, just don’t use the stupid ones, I guess, idk.

      • Rai@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        There’s literally a thing you can click on called, get this…

        FILES

        It’s where all of the files on the device live, at least non-photo/video files.

        • ColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          Actually…android has the exact same app name. “Files” but I guess it’s real name if you want to make sure you’re getting the right one is “Files by Google”

          For android, it seems to be the best one for finding recent stuff and navigating around. Like any newly downloaded or modified thing saved to the phone shows up under a “recently” section in Files, so it works out well for dealing with such a screwball android filing system.

          • Rai@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 year ago

            That’s fair, but not relevant to what I was responding to hahaha

            Also I don’t want anything by google, personally. I don’t use any google products or services.

            • ColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.de
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              1 year ago

              I like being able to hold my phone however I want without losing a connection and not having updates pushed to me that degrade my performance to hide battery and power design flaws, myself ;-)

              • Rai@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                1 year ago

                That’s pretty ignorant also. All phones throttle your power when your battery is old, so instead of just dying at 30% (like old android phones used to), you get a slow drain to under 5% before it dies.

                It’s not a “power design” or battery flaw, it’s literal fucking physics lawl

        • Bytemeister@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          Ελληνικά
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          Nobody came here for answers, they came here for problems that they don’t care to understand!

          Now get lost like my restaraunt menus!

        • papalonian@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          I had an iPhone back when the 3Gs was the newest phone, then an iPod touch 4g after that. None of them had a file explorer while my android phone from the time did. I didn’t know they had added one until recently when I saw it on my roommate’s phone. So they probably didn’t know iOS had one

          • WeirdGoesPro@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 year ago

            You’re referring to some ancient history at this point. iPhones may look like they always have, but they’ve come a long way over the years.

            • papalonian@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              1 year ago

              Yeah, I understand. It does make sense if you think about the demographic that usually uses iPhones vs Androids, I’d be willing to bet 80% of iPhones/iPods (do they even still make the iPod touch?) have only ever opened that app mistakenly haha.

              Not trying to start a flame war or anything, just most iPhone users I know would pretty much never need to use the file explorer.

              • Sjmarf@sh.itjust.works
                cake
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                1 year ago

                Yeah, the average iPhone user probably doesn’t use Files at all. Photos stores all of your photos and videos, so it’s really just PDFs that go in there for me. And a lot people don’t ever download PDFs anyways, since you can view them directly in a browser.

                • WeirdGoesPro@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  That isn’t a negative though. You’re saying that it auto sorts downloaded content well enough that the user doesn’t even have to be aware of how to access the file manager to still use the phone effectively. That isn’t a flaw, it’s a feature.

                  For anyone who does have a baseline level of proficiency, the file manager is functional, and familiar. I use it to pass torrents to my server all the time.

                  With a terminal and a file manager on iOS, I don’t run into a single thing I need to do that I can’t.

    • SkepticalButOpenMinded@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      If anyone wants an actual answer: iPhone has an option to “Save to Files” that lets you select a folder to save to just like on a desktop OS. I’ve personally never lost a file when I do this.

  • hperrin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    It’s either in /sdcard/Downloads or /external/emulated/0/android/data/com.google.chrome/Downloads. Couldn’t be easier.

    • Catsrules@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Except when it is not…

      For example Boost saves photo is some photo folder somewhere.

      The only way i can find anything is using a photo app and scanning my entire phone to find things.

      • bitwolf@lemmy.one
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        Don’t you pick on first run?

        It’s a newer api but I know Sync does that, as well as mgit and a few others.

        • Kogasa@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          Sandboxing is a good thing. It makes it a lot easier and safer for billions of devices to run millions of apps.

          • somethingp@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 year ago

            Sure except that we already have computers where every app uses the same folder structure, just with some files/folders protected with elevated permissions that aren’t accessible to every app. We already have a solution that works and every desktop OS uses. Why would mobile go for a solution that isn’t actually usable?

              • flambonkscious@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                1 year ago

                That’s what people don’t realise… There were very clear distinctions laid out many years ago with how and where data should go places (with win 95, I believe).

            • Kogasa@programming.dev
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              1 year ago

              The desktop solution isn’t feasible in the mobile context. Even for desktops, you see an increased interest in reproducible/containerized/sandboxed environments with docker, flatpak/snap, immutable operating systems, and so on. It’s all about managing complexity.

              • somethingp@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                1 year ago

                All of that interest is from people making computers, or people who manage security. Not from people that use computers as part of their life/work (in contrast to those who’s work is entirely about the computer itself). From a usability standpoint, this type of sandboxing for every app is cumbersome and all it leads to is users finding unsafe work arounds. I used to be able to use my android phone much more as a regular computer than I can now. And I wanted to make a simple app for myself to allow me to automatically copy and catalog photos from my cameras sd card to an external HDD, and I literally cannot do this without jumping through a million permissions and API hoops on Android even though I never plan on publishing this app for others to use. It became such a pain to figure out how to get access to the folders I would need, I just gave up on the entire project. I essentially needed a tool to systematically copy and rename files, and it’s nearly impossible because of these nonsensical policies.

          • lightnsfw@reddthat.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 year ago

            Until it stops me from doing something I want to do and know is safe like modifying my Obsidian notes that are on Nextcloud from my phone. Why can’t it simply prompt me to give Obsidian rw access to that directory or even have some way to allow me to manually change the permissions myself to get it working.

            • Kogasa@programming.dev
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              1 year ago

              The right design decision isn’t necessarily the best for a specific use case. Making the system overall rigid and strict by default makes the whole thing more manageable. Adding features like “user initiated opt-in shared filesystem access for sandboxed apps” increases complexity, hence cost and maintenance burden and likelihood of bugs. Not to say this feature isn’t worth it, but it’s necessary to accept some rough edges in some use cases.

              • lightnsfw@reddthat.com
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                1 year ago

                Making the system overall rigid and strict by default makes the whole thing more manageable.

                More manageable for who? Certainly not me. Which, considering I own the device, is bullshit. Desktop apps have had this figured out for decades.

    • Nelots@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Couldn’t be easier.

      Would certainly be easier if there wasn’t an or in your statement.