• gandalf_der_12te@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    19 minutes ago

    … which is absolutely understandable considering how lemmy is most of the time,

    it’s politics non-stop, one bad news after another, everyone is quick to bash somebody as either a nazi or a tankie or something else.

  • Blackmist@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 hours ago

    Not surprising. As long as they can afford the servers, it will probably get to Mastadon levels.

    Lemmy is a replacement for reddit, and reddit was always much smaller than Instagram.

    • blackn1ght@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 hour ago

      Hopefully people are willing to donate to their instances to keep them financially healthy. It’ll be a pretty big issue for growth if it starts to get popular but the larger instances can’t afford to stay operational and disappear.

    • Ludrol@szmer.info
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 hours ago

      Manually copy and paste?

      Immich is a photo storage software and the other is social media site.

      • utopiah@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 hours ago

        How about an Immich integration, e.g. a button that says “Share via my PixedFed account” or even just the icon that would then post it on your behalf?

    • LiPoly@lemmynsfw.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 day ago

      It’s like saying “people share photos and videos all the time on Twitter. What is the difference with Instagram?”

      • Blackmist@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 hours ago

        So one is for spreading right wing propaganda and one is for shilling knockoff perfumes?

          • Blackmist@feddit.uk
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 hour ago

            As a software guy, that just sounds like one bit of software with two audiences that call it different things.

            Everyone seems to be stepping on each others toes anyway, with “reels” and shit trying desperately to claw back some of those kids lost to TikTok.

            Honestly not sure why the Fediverse is split that way either. A Lemmy client surely contains about 99% of the code to be a Mastodon client or Loops or Pixelfed or any of the others. Just looks like a procession of people constantly reinventing the wheel and painting it a different colour…

      • witten@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        Yes. No transcoding, but that’s actually a feature as far as I’m concerned.

    • rumba@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 day ago

      Everything on Fedi is just different interfaces and perf from the user perspective.

      People want to continue to use something close to Instagram, Facebook, Reddit, Twitter but not be locked to their enshitified companies who decide what they get to see.

      Many that come over find out there’s no algorithm and that they have to follow people to get any content, they find they miss the doom scroll and go straight back.

    • MysticKetchup@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 day ago

      Better UI and a better discover page mainly. Plus it’s gotten a lot of organic advertising just from luck and people talking about it, and no obvious competitor like Bluesky

    • LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 day ago

      Yeah but pixelfed is coming out with loops, it’s been on beta for awhile, that is basically Tik Tok with no ads or government/big tech ownership. I personally feel like that could have taken a giant chunk of the Tik Tok users and kept them from having to learn to read ideograms to access content they wanted. I don’t personally use that format of social media but I tried it on Android and it looks just like Tik Tok looked that I have seen on others devices.

      • 03ari@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 day ago

        The only reason why no company could take over TikTok is their algorithm, its the worst yet the best part of the app, since you only see stuff you like, without having to search for similar accounts. I’ve been feeling lonely on the Fedi compared to other socials

      • ✺roguetrick✺@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 day ago

        I just can’t imagine who will pay for that sort of reach. It’s incredibly expensive for self hosting operations like TikTok. I’d imagine it’d be outrageous without a CDN.

        • rumba@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 day ago

          I’d imagine it’d be outrageous without a CDN.

          The idea is you’d have dozens or hundreds of people hosting loops and they’d each spread the cost among them and get funded by followers and philanthropists. Most lemmy instances use CDN, but it’s nowhere near as heavy media-wise.

          You could also go the Peertube route and have the client share what you’re watching with other people torrent style.

  • ZeroOne@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 day ago

    One question, does LBRY (The protocol powering Odysee) count as something Federated ?

    • rumba@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 day ago

      There was a github request to integrate lbry into fedi, but it never gained any traction.

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fediverse#/media/File:A_view_into_the_Fediverse.png

      So, no, they’re not in the fediverse and don’t interconnect with the other players.

      Here are the current places that play well together.

      Odysee had a shot at making it bigger than it was, but it’s really drowning in bad (moral and qualty) content. They never really recovered from their crypto scheme, once the SEC started looking into them, they got screwed. I’m down with the idea of paying creators in crypto, but they were selling it as a security.

    • sudoer777@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      Does Odysee even use LBRY anymore? They abandoned the desktop app a while ago and I’m not sure how else you can use the protocol

      (if so, then assuming everything is on Odysee then it’s about as federated as Bluesky)

  • FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 days ago

    My feed on Pixelfed is way better the second week, now that I’ve followed a couple dozen folks and put some posts out there.

    • whereisk@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      They need some starter packs like BlueSky because all I’m seeing are some art photography highly likely ai generated - and I have no idea where to find content that has any value. On searching the hashtags I’m getting mastodon posts containing links that can’t be clicked.

      • Wiz@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        20 hours ago

        Mastodon has third-party starter packs now. I wonder if it works for Pixelfed?

      • FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 day ago

        I thought that my first couple of days, but TBH, I actually really like that Fedi social media is completely self-directed. Not having the Jack Dorseys, Donald Trumps, and Zuckerbergs of the world vomiting content or stupid ads onto my feed is well worth the modicum of extra effort.

        I found half of the people I’m following just by posting a picture of my dog and tagging it #CuteAnimals, and that got a nice response. I do follow a few hashtags and found follows there, but I will probably take them off once I’m up to 30-40 follows and I like my feed.

    • Hanrahan@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 day ago

      Yes and the same developer does Loops, the TikTok “equivalent”

      Not sure when he sleeps

    • bruhSoulz@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      Yes.

      -Instagram has pixelfed. -Reddit has lemmy -X has Mastodon/Misskey/Pleroma (&forks…) -Tiktok has loops (app still super rough around the edges and sadly on limited to one instance rather than having its own software from what i understand) -Youtube has peertube (so far the least used i think)

      • TurtleSoup@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        21 hours ago

        Yea peertube is rough… Mostly in part due to, in my opinion at least, people wanting to make use of YouTube’s ad revenue system even tho most creators I watch making most of their income via donations rather than ad revenue.

        • rumba@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 day ago

          Microblogging is covered by Mastodon and Pleroma. People there could easily use them for the same content. There are a ton of options to crosspost tumblr to Mastodon.

          The biggest problem is discovery on Tumblr is a LOT easier than Mastodon, you have to advertise and advocate for yourself

      • 3dmvr@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 day ago

        I dont understand how to join or post on peertube, its the most confusing, do you host your own, is there a feed of all the servers?

        • bruhSoulz@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 day ago

          You just pick an instance and join it, sadly i don’t think it has enough federation yet so its entirely possible u just chose a bad instance and have amazing creators sitting on other instances yours isn’t federated with

          • 3dmvr@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 day ago

            If you f up and join lemmy.dbzero you wont see any posts from lemmyworld users and the same issue if you join the other

            • imaqtpie@lemmy.myserv.one
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              1 day ago

              That’s actually not true. Lemmy.world and lemmy.dbzer0.com are fully federated, you can see for yourself if you check the instances tab.

              The only thing that people incessantly complain about is that lemmy.world blocked one single community from dbzer0, the piracy community. For an account on lemmy.dbzer0, that has absolutely no effect. For an account on lemmy.world, that just means they need an alt if they want to participate in that one community. They two userbases can still fully interact all over lemmy, it’s just that lemmy.world decided to block the piracy community to cover their asses legally.

              Look, here’s https://lemmy.world/c/adhd@lemmy.dbzer0.com

              But people make such a big deal about that one blocked community that a lot of people get the idea that they are defederated or something. You’re not the first person I’ve had to correct about this, not even the first this week lol.

      • Excrubulent@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        I can’t wait for peertube to take off. I think of all of the social medias, youtube has the most enduring monopoly, because hosting is such a huge barrier it’s got even more of a natural monopoly than regular social media.

        I think once peertube can start ascending that might be the ballgame for decentralised social media in general.

        • Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 day ago

          Does peertube have monetization for creator’s? Because that’s how you get content that most people watch.

          • Excrubulent@slrpnk.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 day ago

            Honestly youtube barely has it currently. The vast majority of creators make very little on the platform and rely largely on supporter donations, merch and sponsorships, which could work on any platform.

            By squeezing creators out of every penny they can, youtube has forced people to find other options abd made themselves less and less relevant. I guess that’s enshittification for you.

            You can also gate access to certain videos on peertube, so a nebula-like model might also work eventually.

            • bruhSoulz@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              1 day ago

              I’m genuinely confused. Is YouTube even profitable ATP? Hard to imagine it not being so but they’ve been doubling down on squeezing out every coin they can, trying to fight adblock is one example, pushing out more ads too. Wtf even is going on over there.

              • ✺roguetrick✺@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                1 day ago

                Different metrics on profitability. Are you judging their hosting costs on how much it actually costs Google to add more in their already existing data centers for YouTube like a good vertically integrated monopoly or are you judging their hosting costs on how much their google cloud bill would be. You’ll get wildly different numbers depending on the method.

              • Excrubulent@slrpnk.net
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                1 day ago

                I don’t know that they’ve ever been profitable. They might be a loss-leader in some way, feeding into google’s ad ecosystem somehow, or maybe it was always just theoretically profitable in the future in some ill-defined way that allowed the money to keep flowing. Who knows.

                All I know is, if they follow the pattern the rest of them have, they aren’t going to be sustainable long-term.

        • bruhSoulz@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 day ago

          Exactly!! YouTube is by far the best “social” platform (or least shit) and sadly the strongest monopoly. Cus what the fuck is a newly made competitor gonna do? Rip all YouTube videos and host them? People on IG and X etc don’t really go around looking at old posts, those places are more for looking at what’s new and such. On YouTube however its entirely game that u find a dope edutainment video from years ago that you happen to vibe with.

          • Excrubulent@slrpnk.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 day ago

            That is very true, and I think some kind of archive is going to be important eventually. I think to get around the hosting costs, one method could be for peertube instances to form a union of instances for collective purchases, because the cost goes down with scale.

            With a large enough group you could even split hosting among different providers to prevent a monopoly from forming in the hosting space.

            • TurtleSoup@lemmy.zip
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              21 hours ago

              I think a big part of that is just straight up storage space, more specially a lack thereof. Google won’t release specifics but estimates put the total data stored by YouTube at somewhere near an exabyte (1 million terrabytes). Most of which is made up by video files.

              Of course that’s just issue number 1 of many to figure out.

              • Wiz@midwest.social
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                20 hours ago

                Storage costs keeps getting cheaper, but high quality video keeps taking up more space.

                • TurtleSoup@lemmy.zip
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  20 hours ago

                  It’s a matter of finding where the line between cost and user satisfaction meet.

                  Like sure you could limit all videos to 60fps @ 720p or 30fps @ 1080p but most everyone now wants everything 120fps @ 2160p which takes up dozens of gigs per video and eats up bandwidth.