• Petter1@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 day ago

    Funny how it was outrageous when Musk did it, and now it’s already common and accepted…

    • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 day ago

      I’m old enough to remember Nintendo suing GameGenie for making the test codes on their games more broadly accessible. And Apple suing indie firms that made 3rd party peripherals for their devices. Don’t forget Microsoft’s unholy war on Netscape Navigator, as they deliberately tried to sabotage the popular third party web browser from working via various Microsoft updates. Hell, I think you can find case law in the 1920s on Ford Motor Company fighting spare parts manufacturers and trying to box them out of the industry. Corporate dinosaurs fighting to keep startups from interfacing with their products is a tale as old as time.

      Historically, Facebook/Google/Twitter/et al were focused on integrating with common systems, because they were the underdogs struggling against firms like Microsoft and Comcast who were trying to maintain their Walled Garden. Now they’re kings of the hill, pushing competition off their doorstep.

      Its sleazy and toxic and ultimately bad for the industry as a whole. But its nothing new.

      • Petter1@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        11 hours ago

        Yea, antitrust is nothing new, I agree

        But musk was first banning specific URLs from being posted on a social network for other reasons than security or piracy.

        And as a note, it seems that facebook after all only had a bad spam protection automation rather than malicious intent 🤔

      • NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        17 hours ago

        Microsoft’s

        I would have sworn you wrote McDonalds the first time, and I was like wtf went on there that I had no idea about, until you got to the 2nd Microsoft.

  • Uriel238 [all pronouns]@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 days ago

    Zucky is feeling insecure.

    I’d say provide links (maybe in an escape hub page) for all the Meta main service pages, to assert dominance.

    If you want to be nasty, track how often those links have been clicked. (Meta can’t win. If it’s too low, it shows nobody wants to go there. If it’s too high, it means people are using the page as a Meta hub.)

  • FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 days ago

    I"ve been on Pixelfed for three days and, sadly, it’s pretty underwhelming.

    I’m going to give it a few weeks though and build up a feed.

    • murph@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 day ago

      Remember, there is no algorithm pushing people towards you, look around, follow people, and see who they follow.

      • MisterFrog@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        19 hours ago

        My problem with decentralised social Media currently is that it’s entirely unencrypted and publically viewable.

        I don’t mind so much on services like Lemmy where it’s a bit of fun to make comments and post random things without it being directly linked to your identity (though I am aware the content is still likely being scraped by someone somewhere).

        I’d really love a Facebook/Instagram replacement, but end-to-end encrypted where only the people you’ve given permission to can view your content.

        No idea how this would be achieved, but PixelFed is pretty useless unless you’re posting publically.

  • umbraroze@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 days ago

    Funny thing, Pixelfed isn’t even a competitor to Instagram in the very very strictest sense.

    Pixelfed is a federated service for posting photos.

    Instagram started out as a service for posting photos, but it has become this… thing. I don’t even know anymore.

  • Rob200@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 days ago

    and don’t think they won’t start blocking mentions of Mastodon. unless, they won’t since Mastodon is just known for being a Twitter alternative.

    Make Mastodon known for replacing any and all corporate social media. That’l get em.

    • blind3rdeye@lemm.eeOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 days ago

      Back when I was on Twitter (a couple of years ago now), all links to Mastodon were explicitly marked as “unsafe”, and posts containing such links were demoted. So it’s apparently kind of normal for these social media companies to attempt to choke new competition as early as possible.

    • jago@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 day ago

      Absent present context, that sentence suggests a degree and quality of corporate self-awareness that one can only dream of.

      • bitchkat@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 days ago

        Last week. Was is admin chat talking about moving a group to lemmy. And FB deleted admin chat posts containing links to lemmy.world.

        • TachyonTele@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          2 days ago

          So not .world, it was Facebook?

          Edit. Ah! Im slow lol I get you now. FB removed the lemmy link. Thanks

          • Jeffool @lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 days ago

            hah thanks for your line of questioning. I too initially thought they were saying LW was blocking PixelFed.