Perhaps the most interesting part of the article:

  • homura1650@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 days ago

    When was that house built? What should the current owners do with it? If they sell, someone else needs to buy. Someone is going to be left holding the bag for a decision made decades ago.

    And our current approach already indemnifies them, because their flood insurance is provided by the federal government as no private insurer will offer it. Then, when a flood hits, we all pay for it, along with the emergency response during and after the event.

    • michaelmrose@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 days ago

      The government shouldn’t offer insurance the market won’t. The person holding the bag is the most recent idiot.

    • fine_sandy_bottom@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      4 days ago

      I’m somewhat astonished that you think owners of this type of property ought to be indemnified in any way.

      If I inherited such a property, I would absolutely try to find a “greater fool” to buy it.

      I would point out though, properties like that aren’t going to be unsaleable over night. They’re just going to be less desirable than other properties.