The reverse of that post I’ve made a week ago…

Rules: pick one movie or series and explain why you actually enjoyed it despite the criticism.

For me: The JJ Abrams Star Trek movies, by far the best ST stuff ever made, I couldn’t take seriously the original universe with the dated effects and stiff acting, same goes for NG… These movies did ST actually great looking and much more believable, not just the effects.

  • Simulation6@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 months ago

    Dare Devil, directors cut. I thought it was as good a super hero origins movie as any of the others.

  • sgibson5150@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 months ago

    Me and about a dozen other people thought John Carter was great. To me, it was just a fun sci-fi/fantasy movie. Never undestood the hate.

  • Skyrmir@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 months ago

    Green Lantern. I went in expecting cartoony quips and got what I expected. Everyone calls it a stupid movie like they went in expecting Shakespeare and found the Muppets. I went in expecting a live action comic book, and yeah that’s pretty much what I got. Fun show, watched it a few times now.

    • meyotch@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 months ago

      No matter how nice you are about Green Lantern, Ryan Reynolds still won’t call you. Don’t ask how I know, it’s a touchy subject.

      • Skyrmir@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        9 months ago

        I know why he’s mad, it was a box office disaster. Nothing can fix that short of a time machine.

    • cymor@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 months ago

      I would 100% watch Muppets doing Shakespeare. That’s basically what the comedies were in those days anyway.

  • SanguinePar@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 months ago

    This is kind of a cheat, as it’s been significantly re-evaluated since its release, so I’m not alone, but IMO Twin Peaks: Fire Walk With Me is a masterpiece - it was HATED when it came out though, and even now I suspect there’s a lot of people who would say the same.

    • Duamerthrax@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 months ago

      It’s a fine movie, but people really don’t like being reminded of climate change or other environment issues. Same thing with Avatar. If you cast an environmentalist as a villain though, people seem to like it.

    • Anticorp@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 months ago

      If paper is the most valuable substance in the entire world, then why are they continuously smoking cigarettes that are rolled in paper? That would be like eating a chunk of gold every hour.

    • Dave@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 months ago

      That was the first that came to mind, but I didn’t know it was very hated, just thought it bombed at the box office opening weekend because it was in competition with another movie that was way more popular.

    • GlenRambo@jlai.lu
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 months ago

      Pretty sure when I went to WB world or whatever as a kid they had one of those 15min live shows of it. Jestskis and a few explosions. Surly it can’t be thst unpopular.

    • Ghostface@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 months ago

      DRY LAND!!!

      I dont understand the hate other than cosner was the guy to hate in that era.

      • Anticorp@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        9 months ago

        I’ve never understood Costner hate. He’s a good actor who stars in a lot of good movies.

    • Ceedoestrees@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 months ago

      Solid Film. Quirky characters. Everyone seems to be having fun.

      It inspired me to buy a kayak a few years back to have my Autistic Fish Man Summer.

  • Teknikal@eviltoast.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 months ago

    I quite liked Kraven but all I see of it online is comparisons of which is worst that or Madam Web.

    • vladmech@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 months ago

      I personally didn’t think Kraven was a ‘good’ movie but I at least had a great time watching it in all its weirdness, where Madam Web was just a slog for me

      • burgersc12@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        9 months ago

        Madame Web is basically pointless nonsense, at least Kraven had halfway decent action and an actual plot.

        • Teknikal@eviltoast.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          9 months ago

          Not claiming it’s the best film ever just I enjoyed it for what it was really, just think people are being very harsh in that comparison.

  • databender@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 months ago

    I like all the Terminator movies. All of them. Time travel, killer robots, Arnold; I know it’s wrong but I can’t help myself.

    • burgersc12@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      I can see liking everything up to Salvation, but the last two movies are mostly just lazy cash grabs.

      • EvilBit@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        9 months ago

        I actually enjoyed Dark Fate well enough. It made some ballsy decisions and at least made a modicum of sense.

        • databender@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          8 months ago

          Dark Fate was awesome, “The Return of Sarah Connor” and all that; I like that they’re talking about divergent timelines leading to the same destination - humanity destroying itself through tech. I’ll admit that Salvation wasn’t great, but if you give me a choice between no Terminators in a movie and Terminators in a movie I’ll take the first almost every time.

          I just want to see Terminator vs Predator.

        • Psythik@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          9 months ago

          Terminator 3 was great and I’ll fight anyone who says otherwise. It completed the story nicely and put a little bow on top of it. If they would have ended the series there, I would have been satisfied.

          Salvation was unnecessary, but fun to see stoned off my ass in theaters. Giant robots fighting on a big screen? Sign me the fuck up. Wouldn’t go out of my way to see it again, though.

          I don’t remember a thing from Genesys but I remember enjoying it as well. Haven’t seen any other Terminator films.

  • ch00f@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 months ago

    I don’t think Red One deserved the hate it got. I know everyone is getting tired of Marvel and the Rock, but I thought applying a Christmas theme to the tropes was actually refreshing.

    Like not a great movie, but way more watchable than the last few Capeshit flicks I’ve seen.

    • HexadecimalSky@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 months ago

      I did not know anyone really hated that movie, watched it and recommended it to some people. Yeah, the rock not doing it great, but it was a solid film imo, it was an interesting and funny twist on winter mythos. Not great, not worthy of a sequal, but solid.

      • Psythik@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        9 months ago

        Same; I’ve heard nothing but good things about it. My cousin raved about it for so long on Christmas that I downloaded a copy and streamed it from my phone to my aunt’s TV. Everyone loved it.

    • EvilBit@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 months ago

      The Rock decided that Republicans buy too much of his shitty tequila to risk taking a stand against things like Actual Fascism right around the same time I got fucking exhausted of seeing him everywhere. I’m done with that meathead.

  • MudMan@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 months ago

    Oh, man, where to start. I mean, the Kelvin Trek movies are definitely not the best Trek, but I do enjoy all of them. But speaking of contrarian appreciation, I think most of Star Trek Discovery is also pretty solid, barring perhaps the very last season.

    I’m partial to Lynch’s Dune, too. Maybe I just got used to it over time?

    In the least hip stance possible, I actually think there are very few bad Marvel movies and most are worth at least a cheerful watch (not you, Doctor Strange 2, you suck).

    • reddig33@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 months ago

      Discovery was such a waste of potential. They kept killing off the interesting characters and promoting the least interesting ones. Then the secret to saving the universe one season was rescuing a crying lonely alien. 🙄

      • MudMan@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        9 months ago

        He was more the cause of the end of the world than the solution, but yeah.

        I thought it was… fine? I mean, not the most well rounded thing in Trek history, but fine.

        Discovery suffered from being just fine after having to deal with massive backlash for trying to be different. That and carrying a season-long arc while trying to be a Trek TV show in between the movie bits.

        But I would absolutely watch any of the first four seasons of Disco than any part of Picard. Any day. Season five is a mess and I really don’t vibe with their take on spirituality, but that’s mostly just me.

  • jordanlund@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 months ago

    This year I genuinely enjoyed Megalopolis. It looks great and it’s thoughtful. People won’t “get it” for probably 10 years.

    • NIB@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      There is nothing to get. It is even more basic than philosophy 101, yet it thinks it is some sort of insightful writing. It is cringe and embarrassing, kinda like a 15yo who just read a reddit post on /r/philosophy and then got high and wrote a movie script.

      I do think it is a “so bad, it is actually good” kind of movie. It is almost like a sarcastic movie, making fun of pretentious movies. Maybe this will become the narrative in the future, especially once Coppola is dead.

      It will become a cult classic, but not for the reasons Coppola wants.

    • Rekorse@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      That movie got bad reviews? I liked it, it was hopeful and came out at a good time for it.

      Edit: loved shia labeouf in it too

    • Acamon@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 months ago

      Yeah, I wasn’t that excited about the idea of sequel in the first place, mostly because I didn’t think there was much point to one. So when I saw Resurrections I was actually pleasantly surprised, and genuinely enjoyed the different tone and lamposting of the dumbness of unnecessary sequels.

    • steeznson@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 months ago

      This movie did not work with me at all. I kinda understand the satirical elements but as a fan of the first film I couldn’t stomach it.

    • burgersc12@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 months ago

      The parts where its clear they were forced to make the video game movie or someone else would is great. The rest is… not good imo. Neo uses the force push every 30 seconds and solves all of his problems.

  • Jo Miran@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    For me: The JJ Abrams Star Trek movies, by far the best ST stuff ever made, I couldn’t take seriously the original universe with the dated effects and stiff acting, same goes for NG… These movies did ST actually great looking and much more believable, not just the effects.

    Just kidding… but not really.

      • Artyom@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        9 months ago

        Maybe I do understand why people like Star Trek, but I just don’t like that myself?

      • Platypus@lemmings.worldOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        9 months ago

        Dude if in universe they talk about hyper advanced races or warlords without mercy or AI and all the have is actors in shitty make up or awful “martial arts” and sword fighting, then the new movies are better by default. It’s about immersion

          • Platypus@lemmings.worldOP
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            9 months ago

            No is not. These aren’t books, it’s an audio visual media. Seeing Kirk in a bad looking cardboard looking set pretending to be another planet with soap opera acting won’t sell the idea

        • GunValkyrie@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          9 months ago

          I say this purely tongue in cheek.

          Enjoy your polished turd. But don’t look directly at it. It will blind you with lens flare.

          • Laurel Raven@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            9 months ago

            Funny thing, I didn’t even really notice the lense flares until people started complaining about it… I guess when you live with something like that all the time (thanks, astigmatism), seeing it on screen just doesn’t have the same effect on you

        • ScoopMcPoops@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          9 months ago

          Wow, I don’t think I’ve ever seen someone with this confusing of an opinion. And I’ve met Trump supporters that love Star Trek.

            • Laurel Raven@lemmy.zip
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              9 months ago

              You… You are aware just how much tech and effects have progressed in the last sixty years… Right? What they were doing was groundbreaking for the time, pretty much every time.

              • Platypus@lemmings.worldOP
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                9 months ago

                It was not great even for it’s time. It was passable and I’m also talking about the movie version of those old series with Kirk and Picard. Star wars came like what… A couple of years after? And looked much better, the next gen movies came after the old trilogy and still couldn’t look better…

                The final results are what matter. With sci-fi, the special effects are a primordial part. Also I’m not just talking about effects. Old material was acted like a radio play or theatre… Not a fan. That slowly changed with next generation but still wasn’t enough.

                JJ Abrams movies are “ST if it was actually on our world”. And the actors are EXCELLENT, even the haters admit all of them did excellent evocations of the old actors, some of them actually felt like the same actor but younger, which wasn’t necessary since that cold alienate the viewer but whatever, it worked.

                • JohnnyCanuck@lemmy.ca
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  9 months ago

                  It’s hard to compare the two (original series vs. JJ Abrams), being across such vast differences in time (relative to the progress of technology and style in filmmaking) but its impossible if you’re just going to outright denounce all the qualities the original had for its time.

                  Star wars came like what… A couple of years after? And looked much better

                  Star Trek (1966-1969)

                  Star Wars (1977)

                  You do the math.

                  It was not great even for it’s time. It was passable… With sci-fi, the special effects are a primordial part.

                  What are you comparing it to? The progress in filmmaking during that time was ridiculous. The steadicam hadn’t even been invented yet so shots were much more static. For the time, people were blown away by the sets and effects.

                  Also I’m not just talking about effects. Old material was acted like a radio play or theatre… Not a fan.

                  All the acting and direction in every show and movie at that time was stilted and stiff and yes, very akin to a play. That was the time of Adam West Batman. You don’t have to be a fan. But your statements about it not being good for its time are… Ignorant? At best.

                  JJ Abrams movies are “ST if it was actually on our world”.

                  You’re delusional is you think “actually in our world” is measured by the visual effects technology and the progress of film/TV acting and direction of the time. Connection with the real world is quite literally what set Star Trek apart and made it change the course of sci fi film and television. It took real world politics and social issues and made them part of a sci fi story.

                  But if epic CGI space battles and intrusive lens flare from non-existent lights is your definition of reality, there’s not much else we can say.

                • maxprime@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  9 months ago

                  I don’t have any strong feelings about Star Trek. But I know enough to treat it as a piece of philosophy. It was never about the most advanced visual effects possible (although some of the effects and makeup are quite impressive imo). Star Trek was an investigation into what it means to be human, and the morality behind that. If there was cool tech stuff, that was bonus.

  • FeelzGoodMan420@eviltoast.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    A million ways to die in the west is a solid dumb comedy. The movie has dogshit reviews on every review site but I enjoyed it.