Does anyone else see no resemblance between this guy and the photos of the suspect? I could never in good faith find this Luigi guilty, considering the police clearly need to pin it on somebody
It’s too convenient, basically all the circumstantial evidence they would need to pin it on someone was found on the person who knows they’re the target of a manhunt? Not likely.
Having seen security from the place the police suspect stayed and the ceo video, it’s clearly not the same person. It someone who vaguely could be mistaken from a distance. Too much doesn’t match for me to ever vote anything other than not guilty.
The only thing that man is guilty of as far as I am concerned is having an extra sharp chin. And that’s not a crime last I checked.
That right there - can’t be taking what the police are saying at face value, as an irrefutable truth. Can you yourself prove that they found it on this person? Did you witness it?
They omit evidence, they plant evidence. Can’t exactly take them at their word when they claim they found a backpack with only a jacket and monopoly money, can you? Can’t expect them not to roll a lint brush through an interview room
This reminds me of all those times police bust out the ‘jailhouse informant’ who claims their suspect miraculously confessed every single detail to them after sitting in a cell with this complete stranger for just a few hours.
Luigi did nothing wrong.
Does anyone else see no resemblance between this guy and the photos of the suspect? I could never in good faith find this Luigi guilty, considering the police clearly need to pin it on somebody
It’s too convenient, basically all the circumstantial evidence they would need to pin it on someone was found on the person who knows they’re the target of a manhunt? Not likely.
Having seen security from the place the police suspect stayed and the ceo video, it’s clearly not the same person. It someone who vaguely could be mistaken from a distance. Too much doesn’t match for me to ever vote anything other than not guilty.
The only thing that man is guilty of as far as I am concerned is having an extra sharp chin. And that’s not a crime last I checked.
That right there - can’t be taking what the police are saying at face value, as an irrefutable truth. Can you yourself prove that they found it on this person? Did you witness it?
They omit evidence, they plant evidence. Can’t exactly take them at their word when they claim they found a backpack with only a jacket and monopoly money, can you? Can’t expect them not to roll a lint brush through an interview room
This reminds me of all those times police bust out the ‘jailhouse informant’ who claims their suspect miraculously confessed every single detail to them after sitting in a cell with this complete stranger for just a few hours.
Not guilty