• catloaf@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    24 days ago

    The reason being saturated fats are linked with poor health, and unsaturated fats are linked with better health. And not just in a “rich people are healthier” way, when companies switched, everyone got healthier.

    But this guy doesn’t care. We’re really living in a post-truth world.

    • metaStatic@kbin.earth
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      24 days ago

      it could only be considered post-truth if there was ever any attempt at truth in the first place. Epidemiology makes Astrology look like legitimate peer reviewed science.

      • FalcoLombardi@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        24 days ago

        Do you have any actual sources for that? Like, real sources? Like something peer studied? With a large sample size? And repeatable results?

        • forrgott@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          24 days ago

          You know the answer. And since your apparently advocating that these are healthy, you are, literally by definition, the one making the radical claim.

          You gave nothing to stand on in the first place. Go play in traffic, please. Leave the grass alone… That’s not for you.

          • obre@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            24 days ago

            Brother, I think you’re confused. Falco is advocating for evidence based medicine, not whatever RFK Jr.'s smoking.

            • forrgott@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              24 days ago

              Yeah, I just bounce off cars, though. So I’m awesome, you’re an idiot, go cry in your pillow. Of course you want to taste liberal tears. You’re probably sick of tasting your own

          • FalcoLombardi@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            24 days ago

            I don’t think you understood what I said. This is dismissing an entire scientific branch based on what? I get that he’s using junk/bro science but actual epidemiologists are medical scientists. That’s super dismissive of science in general.

      • Pennomi@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        24 days ago

        Epidemiology is a real thing though. You can certainly track, for example, the link between smoking and lung cancer. Not everything is as clear as that, but epidemiology is quite important.

    • cogman@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      24 days ago

      Yup. It’s well studied which is why when someone has a heart attack the recommendation is essentially eliminating all saturated and trans fat. (See the DASH diet).

      Basically, if the fat is solid at room temp, it’s unhealthy.

          • xmunk@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            24 days ago

            Isn’t that just a measure of the melting point of different fats? And emulsions really muddle that line.

            • HellsBelle@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              24 days ago

              Emulsions are mixtures of fat and liquids, like caesar or greek dressings. They usually require high-speed blenders to do it. Frying bacon wouldn’t be considered mixing.

              That said there are chemicals that can aid emulsivication but I’m unsure if any are additives to bacon (like nitrates and flavorings are).

          • LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            24 days ago

            So your telling me I should be scooping out the contents that harden on top of the crock pot instead of letting them melt back into the pulled pork for flavor… Ugh. I’m lazy so I usually just want to put the pot in the fridge at night, then back on high when I get home, by the time everything else is done it’s basically back to boiling.

            • HellsBelle@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              24 days ago

              Tbf unless you eat pulled pork daily I don’t think it’ll be a problem.

              It’s like that old saying … “Everything in moderation”.

              • LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                edit-2
                24 days ago

                I had to cut back on eggs. I have hens out back that I just let free roam but I hadnt been giving them away fast enough. So I hard boiled a couple dozen and was eating them throughout the day just as snacks to keep food costs low. After day twot I realized I needed to slow my intake. Just got to a loop more people into my egg ring. Luckily people like free eggs right now.

                Come spring I’ll just put a thing down by the road so people can grab them when they drive by, but I do worry kids might have a field day with that lol