For example, let’s say Bernie Sanders was the nominee in 2024 against Trump. A lot of people on the internet seem to like him, even some conservatives. But would liberals fall in line and vote for him enough to beat Trump?

Bernie’s supporters always seem to attack the Democrats liberal base, do you think they’d sit home if Bernie or any leftist was the nominee.

  • angstylittlecatboy@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    Yes, but that’s keeping in mind that, contrary to popular belief among the types that go on Lemmy, most people aren’t ideological. They don’t care that Democrat A is this and Democrat B is that, they care about who they think will help their lives, ideology be damned. So, a lot of the people that socialists would call “libs” would vote for Bernie, BUT, most of those people think of Sanders primarily as “more liberal.”

    People who are actively aware of the difference between neoliberalism and social democracy, I’m not sure. But I honestly think they’re a rounding error in US politics.

    • DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      Socialists are very, very aware that the oppressed masses of people that don’t know what words mean love socialist policies when they don’t know they’re socialist.

      • w3dd1e@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 months ago

        Yup. And not just those voters. It’s an issue in most groups.

        There are even plenty of women that won’t vote for a woman.

  • jeffw@lemmy.worldM
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    No. When you leave social media echo chambers like Lemmy, you hear liberals and others right of center talking about how Kamala was too liberal.

    • RubberDuck@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      That’s just the dishonest pundets though… and the people ratcheting the Dems right. Kamala ran on a Y2K republican program and got annihilated because Y2K republicans are now maga and there are no moderate republicans.

  • JusticeForPorygon@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    Assuming Bernie could get on the ticket, I absolutely believe people would have voted for him.

    The problem is of course getting him on the ticket.

  • doggle@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    Probably. People tend to vote for their team - regardless of the actual underlying policy

    No promises, though.

  • LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    I think democrats would, for the most part. Perhaps less enthusiastically, but since they hate Trump, I think it would not be a major issue.

    The question is, how would low-information unaffiliated voters respond to having a socialist in the ballot? This is a difficult question to answer. Traditionally socialism is a bad word in US politics, albeit less so with younger voters.

    Personally I don’t really buy the “Bernie would have won” stuff but there’s really only one way to find out.

  • CurlyWurlies4All@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    No. And they’ve said as much.

    “Clinton would not pledge to support Sanders if he won the 2020 Democratic nomination.”

    https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/hillary-clinton-sen-bernie-sanders-likes/story?id=68424746

    “However – I do reject socialism as a economic system. If people have that view, that’s their view. That is not the view of the Democratic Party.” - Pelosi

    https://edition.cnn.com/2019/04/15/politics/nancy-pelosi-socialism/index.html

    • doggle@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      I’m not sure how much these endorsements actually matter… Lord knows Liz Cheney’s endorsing Kamala didn’t tip the scales.

      Would establishment libs support a leftist? Maybe not. But that doesn’t mean that voters would necessarily follow suit.

    • volvoxvsmarla @lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      It’s so sad to see this, especially knowing that while you can like or dislike Clinton and Pelosi, I doubt they are unware that Sanders is not proposing socialism. Socialism and social democracy are two very, vastly different things. And they for sure know this very well.

      I sincerely hope that Sanders will found a new party soon, it will have 4 years to gain momentum. Will it win in the next election cycle? No, but it might actually get enough votes to win in 8 or 12 years. Just do it.

      • r_thndr@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 months ago

        Does Sanders have enough life left in him to develop a far-left party? How will it differ from the existing left-leaning third-parties? How would the party stand out and “matter?” Relevant XKCD

        I ask these things as a perennially disappointed minarchist classical liberal.

    • EatATaco@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      Your link is Clinton saying she won’t say before the primary is over whether she would support Sanders. It’s not even her saying she wouldn’t do it, let alone all liberals saying it.

      The amount of disinformation spread here is amazing.

  • Anticorp@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    The DNC will never let a leftist get past the primaries. They’d sooner lose, as they’ve shown us for the last 3 elections.