• Qwaffle_waffle@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      14 hours ago

      Is there a website that can help me make sure I am covering colorblind? Like my work does green/red for pass/fail, but we are trying to add some alternate colors for user to enable as needed.

      • KammicRelief@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        8 hours ago

        Yes! One easy/good one to use is https://webaim.org/resources/contrastchecker/ It lets you pick two colors, and you can even use the eyedropper tool in their Color Picker box to select a color right off your screen. Then it’ll tell you the Contrast Ratio of the two selected colors. Higher is better. It will give you a pass/fail for WCAG AA and AAA (two levels of web accessibility standards). I just now checked the red and green from the linked map and it had a ratio of 1.3:1 which is a fail for both AA and AAA.

        Some websites (like Trello) give accessibility options to skip colors altogether, and use patterns (cross-hatch, polka-dot, etc.). But in general, going for a high enough contrast ratio should be good enough. I’m a web dev as well and we just run everything through one of those WCAG tools (I believe we’ve been using the WAVE browser plugin) and fix it until it passes. :) But, being the colorblind one on the team, I can often just be like “uhmm, that one ain’t gonna work.” lol.

        btw sorry I got so spicy in my initial comment. I really wanted to see the map. :P

        Edit: Another reply to my comment had a link to a more colorblind-friendly version of the map, with red and blue instead of red and green. Much clearer to my eyes. I eyedropped those two colors into that webaim checker, and I was surprised to see it also failed quite badly on the color contrast! For example you wouldn’t want red text on a blue background (unless it was a bright red and dark blue, or vice versa). But for map colors, well… I guess that goes to show that for colorblind checking you have to use a little common sense and know what the most common no-no combos are (red/green seems to be the most common). I checked the accessibility docs at my work just now and we sometimes use this site to check what a site looks like under various types of colorblindness: https://www.toptal.com/designers/colorfilter

  • INHALE_VEGETABLES@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 day ago

    blockade /blŏ-kād′/ noun

    The isolation of a nation, area, city, or harbor by hostile ships or forces in order to prevent the entrance and exit of traffic and commerce. 
    

    The forces used to effect this isolation.

    The shutting up of a place by troops or ships, with the purpose of preventing ingress or egress, or the reception of supplies.

    "the blockade of the ports of an enemy"
    
  • anachronist@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 day ago

    I used to believe that the Cuba embargo is due to Cuban refugee vote in Florida.

    But that doesn’t make sense anymore given that Florida is no longer a swing state. In fact it never really made sense since the demo that is very pro-embargo has always been solidly Republican and therefore unwinnable.

    So what really explains the embargo? Quite frankly I think it’s banana republic foreign policy and wealthy people in the US not wanting there to be a successful socialist state. For instance, the recent energy crisis in Cuba is driven by the Biden administration sanctioning oil tankers who visit the island. Why on earth would the supposedly pro-Cuba democrats do that? Who asked them to do that? Who had the clout to make them do that? Some losers in Florida who were going to vote for Trump in a red state anyway?

  • brucethemoose@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 day ago

    Just imagine if the UN had teeth for enforcement, at least for overwhelming votes like this. I feel like its one of the biggest oversights of the post WWII order they tried to make.

    Big countries, of course, would never allow that, but still.

      • anachronist@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 day ago

        The proposal was submitted by the Russian Federation shortly after they attacked Ukraine, back when Russia was still claiming that “de-nazifying” Ukraine was the purpose of the invasion.

        https://press.un.org/en/2022/gashc4365.doc.htm

        Several delegates took to the floor to express concerns over Moscow’s attempt to exploit the pretext of combating neo-Nazism to justify its brutal war against Ukraine, with Ukraine’s delegate asserting that the draft has nothing in common with the genuine fight against Nazism and neo-Nazism. Echoing his concerns, the United Kingdom’s delegate stressed that the resolution is part of Moscow’s attempt to justify its aggression against Ukraine by furthering lies and distorting history.

        The United States’ delegate called the resolution “a cynical attempt” of Moscow to further its geopolitical aims by invoking the Holocaust and Second World War. In the same vein, Australia’s delegate called Moscow’s weaponization of the Holocaust and Nazism unacceptable.

        • Peter1986C@lemmings.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 day ago

          Alt explanation: because Russia brought that one up, and at the time they were already messing with Crimea so UA knew something was up. I could be wrong though.

          • bloubz@lemmygrad.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 day ago

            I don’t understand what you’re telling us. But as a reminder, last year Ukraine was the one to abstain from voting in the Cuba blockade stop (still with the US and Israel voting against)

    • Alsephina@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 days ago

      Less so that they disagree and more so that it would damage their propaganda potential too much

  • gnutrino@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 days ago

    The author needs to learn the difference between a blockade and an embargo. Cuba hasn’t been under blockade since the end of the missile crisis.

    • Alsephina@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 days ago

      It’s very much a blockade in practice since it prevents the vast majority of companies from any country trading with it.

      • turmacar@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 days ago

        That’s an embargo.

        A blockade is military stopping traffic. “Effectively a blockade” is an embargo.

    • Xavienth@lemmygrad.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 days ago

      An embargo would imply its just America that can’t trade with Cuba. In reality, almost nobody can trade with Cuba, because any ship that does cannot enter American ports to trade with America.

      It may not be a blockade by the dictionary definition, but it’s certainly not just an embargo.

  • reddit_sux@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 days ago

    What worse can Orange buffoon do to the world. At least with him in the helm the world will understand the truth US doesnt care about anyone or anything but itself.

    • Sarmyth@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      Well for one, he’d make it worse for Americans, specfically women.

      America often acts it’s own self interests which are going to run counter to the world sometimes. But if I am chosing between voting to benefit my fellow Americans or some other country… it’s gonna be America. I expect and witness the same from every other country as well.

      • reddit_sux@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        15 hours ago

        Toppling elected governments, propping up dictators, attacking countries without reason, suppoting terrorists all in the name of self interest.

        Don’t feel bad if the world wishes the same to your country.

        • Sarmyth@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          15 hours ago

          We do and we dont. Almost 350 million people have differences of opinion quite frequently. Thankfully most of the world thinks our positives outweighs our negatives.

          Either that or they are too weak to stop us in any meaningful way. We’ve seen how many genocides over the past few years from superpowers and no one does anything? Only way you’ll see a real check on America or China’s power is through a world War which everyone rightfully wants to avoid.

          • reddit_sux@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            15 hours ago

            Only way you’ll see a real check on America or China’s power is through a world War which everyone rightfully wants to avoid.

            Other way is to use your tactics of election interference on you and gift you Trump.

            • Sarmyth@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              15 hours ago

              Yeah, always an option. I mean it won’t alleviate any of the world’s problems but if you like chaos and death by America’s hands it’s an option counties can take.

    • Miles O'Brien@startrek.website
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 days ago

      Comments like this are one of a few things.

      Bad faith, and useful idiots intentionally trying to keep people from wanting to go out and vote, which only helps MAGAts.

      And dumbass, blind as shit privileged people who think nothing has changed in the last decade because you’re simply not part of the target groups yet.

      Life is so much worse for so many people because of Trump and to pretend like it wouldn’t get worse with a second presidency (you know, the one where they intend to destroy democracy and the voting process and have said as much and have documents detailing how they plan to do it) is simply idiotic.

      • freagle@lemmygrad.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 day ago

        But democracy and the voting process brought us Trump! It brought us genocide, it brought us child separation, it brought us the CIA, it brought us children in solitary confinement, it brought us the police force, it brought us Vietnam, it brought us nuking Japanese civilians, it brought us indigenous genocide, it brought us Flint, it brought us the highest rate of incarceration in the world over the last century.

        What does destroying US democracy and US voting actually, materially, change?

        • smb@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          17 hours ago

          But democracy and the voting process brought us Trump! It brought us genocide

          the genocide filth that imho lasts >400years now has never been removed in the first place, i’ld guess it wasn’t brought there by voting process, but it wasn’t removed by it either.

          • freagle@lemmygrad.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            9 hours ago

            Oh the genocide was absolutely a function of the republic qua republic. Elected representatives dealt with “the Indian problem” in various ways that garnered votes.

      • Skua@kbin.earth
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 days ago

        Hell even on the issue of Cuba specifically, during his presidency Trump chose to undo the progress Obama had made. He has already made it worse

    • B0rax@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 days ago

      He can, in fact, make a lot of stuff worse. And I promise you, he will if he gets the chance.

        • B0rax@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 days ago

          In some ways, maybe. But I think a destruction of the US would also cause a lot of problems.

          • PolandIsAStateOfMind@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 days ago

            Yes, a controlled dismantlement would be better than collapse, and proletarian revolution would be best, but currently there’s not much prospects for either of those, so:

            “There were two “Reigns of Terror,” if we would but remember it and consider it; the one wrought murder in hot passion, the other in heartless cold blood; the one lasted mere months, the other had lasted a thousand years; the one inflicted death upon ten thousand persons, the other upon a hundred millions; but our shudders are all for the “horrors” of the minor Terror, the momentary Terror, so to speak; whereas, what is the horror of swift death by the axe, compared with lifelong death from hunger, cold, insult, cruelty, and heart-break? What is swift death by lightning compared with death by slow fire at the stake? A city cemetery could contain the coffins filled by that brief Terror which we have all been so diligently taught to shiver at and mourn over; but all France could hardly contain the coffins filled by that older and real Terror—that unspeakably bitter and awful Terror which none of us has been taught to see in its vastness or pity as it deserves.” ― Mark Twain, A Connecticut Yankee in King Arthur’s Court

            • smb@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              17 hours ago

              so then its fully okay for you if its the us thats to be broken then, thanks for admitting it. and after breaking the omlettes eater’s own eggs for him to consume there’s then a chance that no omlettes need to be made any more. a chance of improvement is always better than no chance for it.

                • smb@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  14 hours ago

                  i meant improving society and strengthen its immune system against threats that would otherwise cause collapses. imperiums cause and collapse/vanish all the time, just try to count the already vanished ones in “known” history, i guess while you are still busy counting the known ones there will be even more “newly found” by archaelogists. while lots of them just vanished without trace, some vanished but just weren’t found yet.

              • Sodium_nitride@lemmygrad.ml
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                16 hours ago

                The US government is putting the boot on your necks too. The empire isn’t run for your benefit, it is run at your expense.

                • smb@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  15 hours ago

                  the ‘empire’ is run to everyone’s expense including the 'empire’s own expense even if they show a whole mess of false evidences that their’re not. they are.

              • queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                edit-2
                1 day ago

                I’m trans in a red state. I am not safe.

                I just recognize that the US is a blight and must be destroyed, and that one candidate is more likely to result in the US’s defeat.

                That’s more of a silver lining, though.

                • smb@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  17 hours ago

                  if you live in an unsafe country, its maybe better for you to flee before it gets even worse.

                • belastend@slrpnk.net
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  1 day ago

                  I sincerely hope for you, that the candidate thats worse for the us wont win.

                  And i continue to hope youll be safe someday.

              • smb@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                17 hours ago

                “power vacuum” is when all the filth was vacuumed and there is a chance. that chance vanishes when filth starts piling up again and someone else gets into power, creating the need to vacuum again. i’ld rather like it tidy and clean than filth-controlled.

  • j4k3@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 days ago

    Embarrassing country to live within, but Hitler talk and our genocidal crusaders state make us the evil of greater proportions now.