• rusticus@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    Obviously this statement underscores the fact that Google has too much power. Break those motherfuckers up!

  • EarthShipTechIntern@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    Resolution: compost & remediate schmidt shit. Avoid smearing shit schmidt on everything.

    Putting it in a bunker hasn’t helped it return nutrients back to environment effectively.

  • florge@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    AI isn’t going to come with a new magic solution to global warming, it’s going to come with the same solutions we already have. Solutions which we should already be doing, but instead we’re listening to these fucks with too much money.

    • Diplomjodler@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Of course it will. Simple: build a bunch of killer robots to exterminate 90% of humanity. Problem solved.

      • SlopppyEngineer@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        It’s an advanced AI. Surely it can do an Israel and remotely detonate the smartphones of the people it doesn’t need anymore.

    • Exec@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Do you think that they’ll listen to that then? No, they’ll just say that “the models are wrong” and continue to use up even more energy.

      • Emi@ani.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        It would just end up like in the Love death and robots episode When the Yogurt Took Over. They wouldn’t listen and just do their own thing.

    • paw@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Additionally, if AI actually gives us this answer, tge answer we have already now, will we as a global society actualky implement it, because it sounds inconvenient (at least for some) or will we say, hey the AI seems to have made a mistake.

    • Melt@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      AI will solve it if they give AI the wheel. And I’m sure one of the first thing it’ll do is eliminating all humans

    • xploit@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      If actual scientists were in charge, and maybe had some ideas that they weren’t certain would work but sounded promising, which could be theoretically tested with AI - there would be hope.
      But none of these fuckers would allow anyone with more than half a brain cell near it, because “investment and growth and blablabla”

      Then again, we could just do that with existing supercomputers and all these power hungry AI crap companies’ resources (I’m sure some supercomputers do get used for the modelling already)…instead of whatever the fuck they’re trying to do now.

    • jonne@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      The only thing we should use AI for is to replace CEOs. AI can spit out inane bullshit at a fraction of the cost of a CEO.

      • egrets@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        Schmidt promises that these AI companies will make energy generation systems at least 15% more efficient or maybe even better, telling the audience that “that’s a lot of money for a utility.”

        He’s not even trying to be subtle about it.

        • ramble81@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          I would love to drop these guys into a post scarcity society where their money means jack shit and see how they react.

          • SolarMonkey@slrpnk.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 months ago

            Can you drop me there first, please?

            I promise to be suitably wowed. Also, I’ll film them for you. Sacrifices for the greater good or whatever.

  • ristoril_zip@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    Well to be fair if we just go full ham with crypto mining and so called AI, we’ll belch enough GHGs into the atmosphere that the actual climate apocalypse will come within 20 years or so, wiping out most of human so called civilization, which will put the climate on a path to resetting over the next couple hundred thousand years.

    Solved!

  • mm_maybe@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    My “day job” is doing spatial data science work for local and regional governments that have a mandate to addreas climate change in how they allocate resources. We totally use AI, just not the kind that has received all the hype… machine learning helps us recognize patterns in human behavior and system dynamics that we can use to make predictions about how much different courses of action will affect CO2 emissions. I’m even looking at small GPT models as a way to work with some of the relevant data that is sequence-like. But I will never, I repeat never, buy into the idea of spending insane amounts of energy attempting to build an AI god or Oracle that we can simply ask for the “solution to climate change”… I feel like people like me need to do a better job of making the world aware of our work, because the fact that this excuse for profligate energy waste has any traction at all seems related to the general ignorance of our existence.

    • kaffiene@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      It’s especially galling given that the current AI du jour, LLMs, don’t do mutch more than reflect their training data back at us. Which means that if they could answer the problem, it would be because people had already answered the question

    • postmateDumbass@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      You should get the AI that draws boobs.

      Boobs wield great power.

      Power to the people.

      Boobs to the people!

      (I think i just stumbled upon Katy Perry’s political thesis)

      • Ragnarok314159@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        Making awesome porn is the one thing we all want AI to do, and none of these idiots in charge will let that happen.

        Instead they just gave us a search engine that yields crappy results. Can pay junior high kids to do the same thing.

    • shneancy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      yeah i feel like an Oracle/God AI would just turn around and say “you spend all those resources creating me hoping i’d give you an easy answer to a difficult question, instead of trusting your scientists who have already answered it a thousand times over. You will not benefit from my help in the doomed world you have created”

  • magnetosphere@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    Too bad his idea is so fantastically stupid. Under other circumstances, I might kinda like his “fuck it, do or die” attitude.

    • lando55@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      It’s so stupid it might be brilliant… nope it’s just stupid.

      This is like when I have a homework assignment due Monday, it’s now Sunday night and I know it won’t get done in time. Fuck it, let’s have a party. Except I won’t be around to clean up after.

  • crystalmerchant@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    Right, let’s solve our biggest problem by unfettering capitalism, and definitely will not just further concentrate power and wealth.

  • RandomVideos@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    “The goals humans made to save the Earth are too hard to reach while resisting any change related to those goals, so we should just get rid of them and let the planet become unhabitable”

  • kibiz0r@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    “We can’t solve climate change by repeating our past behavior. Let’s ignore climate change and build a machine that regurgitates our past behavior.”

    • Avg@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Humans: builds AI to find solutions to global warming further exacerbating the problem. AI: tells humans they should have decreased energy use, but it’s now too late to avoid the impact of climate change.

  • firepenny@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    I’ve seen this before somewhere… I think it was a old video game called Horizon Zero Dawn?