• jabathekek@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 months ago

    Yan allegedly clenched and unclenched rhythmically to communicate information about the chess board via code to a computer, which then sent back instructions on what moves to make in the form of vibrations

    Wow.

    • Stoneykins [any]@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      If I had a nickle for everytime there was a chess scandal and some media site reported that someone (allegedly) cheated with bluetooth anal beads, I could buy some bluetooth anal beads and win a chess tournament

    • remotelove@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 months ago

      Yan had cheated during the competition by using anal beads equipped with wireless transmitters to send and receive signals.

      Adding the context to your quote…

  • caboose2006@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 months ago

    Me “What’s the difference between a bathtub and a toilet?”

    Yan Chenglong “Idk. What?”

    Me “Please leave my house”

  • eponymous_anonymous@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 months ago

    Unfair. Moral character has nothing to do with raw talent and skill - if shitting in a bathtub so hard you damage hotel property isn’t explicitly banned in the rule book, and the people running the contest haven’t found a method to effectively drug test their athletes for anal bead usage, then I think he should get to keep his title.

    After all, there’s no rule saying dogs can’t play basketball

    • Phoenixz@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      More to the point: one thing hs nothing to do with the other

      The guy is an asshole, but that has nothing to do with chess

    • Melllvar@startrek.website
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 months ago

      There may be a morals clause in whatever contract they signed. (IDK about Chinese law on the subject, though)

    • charles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 months ago

      There was never any evidence of this. The best explanation I heard is that Magnus’ company was merging with chess.com right before a tournament, and with that the information of cheating bans were made available to him. He found out that Hans had been banned for cheating a couple years prior on chess.com. Speculation is that this put Magnus on tilt during his match with Hans, and losing just confirmed Magnus’ suspicion that Hans is a cheater IRL as well as online.