It turns out that more technology in cars isn’t necessarily something customers want, and it’s not really improving their driving experience. We know my thoughts on the matter, but I’ll do my best to stay impartial on this latest survey from JD Power that shows most customers don’t appreciate technology in cars unless they can see a clear benefit to them.

JD Power’s 2024 U.S. Tech Experience Index Study evaluated over 81,000 drivers’ experience with “advanced vehicle technologies” in 2024 model year vehicles after 90 days of ownership, It turned out to be a pretty mixed bag when it came to what people liked using. There are a number of tech features that customers like using because they feels that it answers their needs, but at the same time there is a whole lot that don’t get used very often or are continually annoying, according to the survey.

  • Gabadabs@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    I drive an EV for work, any my biggest gripe is the touchscreen. What is wrong with buttons. Why must everything be hidden behind a menu I have to navigate on a touchscreen. It feels less safe, frankly. In my own car I have muscle memory for each button and can do things like skip songs or adjust the AC without looking away from the road… But in the EV I can’t.

    • Noxy@yiffit.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      What does being an EV have to do with anything? ICE cars are exactly the same.

      I totally agree with you though. Tech and UI in modern cars is pretty awful.

      • Zetta@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        I would say eve typically do have more controls on touchscreens vs buttons. Now this issue is mainly observed in Teslas more than any other car, but Teslas are the most popular ev so ya it’s definitely more of a problem on evs.

      • cheesepotatoes@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        Mhmm. Fewer moving pieces, fewer under warranty repairs. Also simplifies production, just need to screw in a screen.

          • NιƙƙιDιɱҽʂ@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            3 months ago

            I wish they’d do exactly what they’re doing now, but add a series of generic physical buttons along the bottom that can be remapped as quick buttons that either the OEM or end user can map to specific features.

            E.g. A/C controls, skipping songs, opening apps or whatever.

            • Semi-Hemi-Lemmygod@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              3 months ago

              My car does it pretty well. It’s got a touch screen, but it also has a knob and two buttons that I can use instead of the touch screen.

          • bitwaba@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            3 months ago

            And charge people for over the air software unlocking of features that are already part of the car but they “didn’t pay for” when they bought it.

        • dan@upvote.au
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          3 months ago

          Also there’s no need to design a new user experience for each model of car - things like designing buttons and a button layout that fits in with the overall interior design of the car. Just use a touchscreen and reskin the same UI.

    • Scrollone@feddit.it
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      I still wonder why new cars aren’t equipped with a dashcam by default. It’s probably because of privacy reasons, but still… The world would be a better place if every car was equipped with a dash cam.

      • Thebeardedsinglemalt@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        I dig the idea too but at the same time there are privacy concerns, more than half the population wouldn’t know how to use 'em and I’m sure large groups of people would be pissed they’re even there. And how long would it take to have regulations where they’re wifi enabled and cops can subpoena dashcam info.

        On the opposite side I genuinely believe you should get a break on your car insurance if you have a functioning dashcam.

      • aulin@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        Here in Denmark (maybe all EU, not sure) a dashcam has to be turned on manually. If it were to turn on automatically with the car, it’d be illegal. I’m guessing laws across the world could be stopping such a rollout.

      • fuckwit_mcbumcrumble@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        Honestly that’s all I want out of the center screen.

        I like my 2018 Outbacks layout. Physical controls for AC, knob for volume, and a reasonable touch screen. The gauge cluster has a small screen in the center that shows me some basic info I’d like to see like tire pressure, MPG, etc.

        • garretble@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          3 months ago

          I’m in this scenario, too.

          When I needed a new car in 2019 I somehow found a six speed manual Crosstrek that has all physical buttons for climate and radio/volume that also has a backup cam and a touchscreen for CarPlay/Android Auto.

          It’s perfect.

  • Let's Go 2 the Mall!@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    give me buttons and dials, not touch screens and ai. I want to drive, not check social media. I’ll be keeping my 2009 until the engine locks up.

    • nbailey@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      It’s not perfect, but the new (2019+) mazda system is very nice. It’s all controlled by buttons and dials, zero requirement to ever touch a screen. It all feels quite thoughtfully done, especially when you compare it to fords or teslas with a big dumb laggy iPad stuck to the dash.

  • dmtalon@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    I’m ok with a decent amount of tech in a car. Like I’m fine being able to connect my phone to the car and have android auto take over the infotainment system.

    But the HVAC stuff needs to be buttons I can access/control without looking or very minimal looking.

    I don’t want/need my car to have a SIM card, or connect to wifi, and report what I’m doing. If they want to do that, then they can give me the car for free and I’ll drive it around letting them collect my driving habits.

    Edit: Oh, and I’m sure as hell not paying some subscription fee on top of the price of the car.

    • WhoisJohnGalt@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      I stopped using Android Auto on my infotainment system. I thought it was just me but when I’m using navigation (Google maps or wyze), the second I lose service for any reason, it completely exits out and cancels my navigation. I found that if I use it in my phone, it doesn’t have that issue.

      2020 Subaru Forester, but friends with other cars (VW, Honda) mentioned the same issue. Not sure if this has been fixes in recent Android Auto updates or in newer cars, but I’m not going to chance it anymore.

    • TheDemonBuer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      I’m ok with a decent amount of tech in a car. Like I’m fine being able to connect my phone to the car and have android auto take over the infotainment system.

      This reminds me of my 2016 Honda Civic. It had just the right amount of tech.

    • kn0wmad1c@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      I have a 2023 Mazda CX-5 and it has the perfect amount of tech for me. The headunit isn’t touch screen, but you get used to the control knob after about a day and eventually it just feels second-nature. Also, all of the hvac controls are physical knobs and buttons, which is amazing.

    • Wogi@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      I love my subaru outback. It’s a great car. It does all the car things exceptionally well. It holds a lot of stuff. Snow, mud, fuck you it’s all pavement to me baybeee.

      I fucking hate my Outback’s climate control, entertainment, map, and information screen. I understand newer models have improved slightly. It’s still awful. The only good thing about that fucking screen is that I can turn everything on from my phone. Literally every other function is awful to try to access and use while you’re driving.

      • restingboredface@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        Got a '24 outback late last year. For the most part I love it-it’s comfortable, holds my giant dogs and it’s way better to drive in bad weather than my previous car.

        I’d read reports on subaru forums that infotainment was bad, so my expectations were low. But even basic stuff isn’t functional. It has gotten less responsive over the months (reminder: we’ve had it just barely a year). The screen has several seconds of lag with every touch, and sometimes controls just don’t work at all. I don’t like that we have to use it for temperature control, and android auto integration is clunky (though that may not be Subaru’s fault).

        Add that to the horrifying data collection practices and it makes me question ever getting a Subaru again.

        • tal@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          3 months ago

          Is it possible to get some kind of firmware update that you may not have received?

          kagis

          This Reddit thread makes it sound like you need to manually do it or the dealer will do it as part of the regular maintenance. Not sure if this is specific to that model year.

          https://old.reddit.com/r/Subaru_Outback/comments/18cjt00/software_update_december_2023/

          Reminds me I need to update mine!! Did you have to take this in to the dealer to get it updated or did you do it yourself?

          Dealer did that

          What does the dealer charge?

          I am not sure. It was part of my regular maintenance.

          And

          Does this help the PAINFULLY slow response in the screen?

          Yes, it does! The lags are very short now, if there are any at all.

          The people there are also complaining about the touchscreen instead of physical controls.

      • Blaster M@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        2018 Impreza Base here. Manual ac controls (where, how fast, how hot), but the touchscreen infotainment is still AIDS. Several seconds from press to recognition. I need the screen to actually do stuff when I press it, not leave me guessing if I hit it right. If they can’t put a faster cpu, they need to have programmers that can optimise these units so they run responsively. There’s no excuse for that legendary input lag.

        Good car though, other than that.

      • frunch@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        Similar complaint here. We were ready to replace our 2011 outback and decided it would make sense to get something at least a bit more modern. Loved our outback, and honestly would have bought another if it weren’t for that damn screen.

        After getting a gander at that thing, we seemingly confused (or probably just disappointed) our salesman by insisting we wanted the most simple, stripped-down style console they had to offer. Apparently we’re not the most common customers, but i know I’m kinda weird so fair enough. After he went back inside to find out which models they had on the lot that might fit that description, the only one that had a “simple” console was the base model Forester. It was just not enough to transition over from our comfy 6-cyl beast that just had a 6-cd changer with a 1-inch-tall screen and an aux jack, but everything was operated by buttons. Even the rear view mirror had a clever backup camera integrated into it. Makes more sense that way, imo. It was everything we needed and only a smidge more.

        I really wish we could have just bought a newer model of the exact same car feature-wise… That outback was a great car 🙂

      • EldritchFeminity@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        I just bought a forester a few months ago, and my 2 stipulations on the cars I was looking at were all-wheel drive because I live in snow country, and a car no newer than 2018 (IIRC) because that was the year car companies largely switched from manual controls to a 16-inch screen with everything, including climate control, accessed from an app.

        When I was talking to the guy at the dealership I bought it from and mentioned how much I disliked the new screens, he outright said, “Yeah, a lot of people don’t like them.”

    • Thebeardedsinglemalt@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      But the HVAC stuff needs to be buttons I can access/control without looking or very minimal looking.

      100% this. I shouldn’t have to click through 2 menus on a touchscreen to change a basic environmental control. Give me a damn knob, so if I want to change something I can reach my hand over and turn 2 clicks without taking my eyes off the road.

    • odium@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      Good news, lawmakers in the US finally started looking at this issue.

      Bad news: probably will take years for change

      • callouscomic@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        There are numerous headlines like:

        118th Congress on track to become one of the least productive in US history

        So good luck with that.

        • odium@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          3 months ago

          The company I work at is tangentially related to car company data collection. And this week, all employees received an email that we were legally required to save all records newer than 2005 related to a specific car company’s onboard data collection service.

          So it does seem like the investigation has already got a subpoena or smth.

        • tal@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          3 months ago

          There’s activity at the state level too in multiple states. I heard something about California, then not a lot. Bunch of articles about Texas.

    • Wrench@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      When carplay works, it’s great. But mine constantly has issues connecting to phones. Both my wife’s iPhone, and my Android. Both are flagships that are a couple years old, so still very current and sufficient specs.

      Meanwhile, my old aftermarket Bluetooth radio connects every time with no issue.

      I do like the convenience of GPS and audio on the car tablet when it works. But honestly, it’s a distraction when it’s being fussy.

    • tal@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      If they want to do that, then they can give me the car for free and I’ll drive it around letting them collect my driving habits.

      I mean, that’s kind of what they’re doing in that having another revenue stream will reduce the car price relative to what would have been the case if they couldn’t do so.

      If some people want to make that trade, I think that they should have the option to do so.

      I don’t personally want to make that trade myself, though.

      • dmtalon@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        I disagree, most of these subscriptions options are all built in and “enabled” if bought. There ain’t no car manufacturers looking to reduce their car prices for us. It’s profit above everything

    • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      As of 2022, Toyota still put physical buttons on their HVAC system and audio system.

      I know because, against my advice, my wife bought a Toyota Rav4 Hybrid in 2022. I can’t tell her how to spend her money, but at least the car she got didn’t have some of this other bullshit.

      • dmtalon@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        I have a 2008 tundra a coworker just bought a new one so I asked for a ride. It was nice to see under the enormous center display, the HVAC controls!

        • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          3 months ago

          I didn’t think she should have bought any car. Her old car worked. It wasn’t in the best shape in the world, but it was fine. And 2022 was a terrible year for buying a car.

          • Bytemeister@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            Ελληνικά
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            3 months ago

            That’s how you do it. Drove my 99 Crown Vic until the wheel literally fell off. Had it put back on and did another 80k on it. Traded it in at the dealer 4 years later, in working order, simply because it cost 80 dollars a week in gas, and that was back in 2018.

            • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              3 months ago

              Yep. I had a 2002 Civic that I was planning to drive into the ground, but an idiot mechanic accidentally left the oil cap off when he was fixing it and it eventually destroyed the engine. The amazing thing is it took a very long time to destroy it. We successfully drove my car back from Baltimore to where we live in Indiana and several two hour plus round trips after that before it conked out on me coming home one day back in 2019. So I bought a used 2016 Prius and I plan to drive that into the ground. I just don’t need a fancy new car. I’d like to get an EV only because I hate getting gas, especially in the winter, and if I never had to do it again, I’d be really happy. But I don’t want one enough to get rid of the car I have now.

              • Bytemeister@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                Ελληνικά
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                edit-2
                3 months ago

                I drove the Vic with essentially a liter of burnt Hershey chocolate syrup for 3 hours on the highway, and then daily’d it for another 5 days.

                Teens are rough on cars, but it survived.

        • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          3 months ago

          It’s a good car. I just wish she hadn’t decided to buy one in 2022. It’s bad enough to buy a new car now, it was worse then.

  • Bye@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    I like having Siri in my car when she works. Like when my phone properly wirelessly connects. But when it doesn’t, I hate it, and would be better without it.

    Also why the hell can’t CarPlay use the radio, when the car has a radio. Why can’t those two things talk to each other. Fucking dumb.

  • Darkassassin07@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    Yup.

    I refuse to buy any vehicle made after 2015, and even that’s quite a bit newer than I’d like.

    • grue@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      I wouldn’t mind having tech in my car, but I have a zero-tolerance policy for proprietary spyware-infested shit. Therefore, I can’t buy any vehicle made after 2015.

      I’d like to have a double-DIN car computer with a Raspberry Pi, RTL-SDR (for the radio) and OBD2 connection, but haven’t gotten around to making one yet.

  • samokosik@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    well obviously My aunt has a modern car that reads the signs for you. Where I live there is a highway in the middle and normal road on the outer side. That piece of crap slows down to 70 km/h from 130 when it sees the sign that belongs to the other road…

    However, not all tech is terrible. For example, parking cameras, gps, cruise control are useful

  • Maggoty@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    That’s because they’re putting dumb shit in. We have the technology for example to -

    Have high beams shine around other cars. (Regulators actually fucked this up)

    Put all the speed and other needed information on the windshield.

    Put a thermal image on the windshield so you can see the road as if it were daylight.

    Use “fly by wire” controls instead of the same control scheme as a Model T.

    And quite a bit more. But no instead we have the world’s worst mix of UI/UX and software in an attempt to save money and sell data.

      • Maggoty@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        Thermal imaging would mean we could reduce lights to just markers. But also those high beam systems should be able to recognize cyclists and sidewalks. It’s not perfect but it’s better than what we have now.

    • TheWeirdestCunt@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      Fly by wire would be a terrible design for a car, I’ve seen people driving on space saver tires or with taped up windows for months. If people already just ignore warning lights until something physically stops them from driving then at least having a physical steering column means there’s still control after the power steering fails so that they don’t go straight on into oncoming traffic.

      On your other point about still using the same control systems as a model T, modern cars don’t. Hydraulic steering came around in the 50s and almost all modern cars have electric power steering, the model T had completely unassisted rack and pinion steering. I can’t find any definite answer on what the last car without any hydraulic steering was but I’d definitely like to find out if anyone knows.

    • jawa21@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      I’ve driven a car that used a projected HUD like that before and hated every second. It is horribly distracting and unnecessary. The traditional dash is just better and has remained unchanged for so long for good reasons.

      • Maggoty@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        Okay. And I’ve driven stuff with projected HUD and loved not having to look away from the road. The best part about tech like that is you can turn it off. It takes literal pennies to implement.

  • bl_r@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    I love my car for the fact it doesn’t do anything crazy. Buttons and switches for everything, bluetooth for music, and a minimalist infotainment system that may as well only be there for the phone pairing process.

    I might be in the minority, but I hate Apple CarPlay/Android Auto. I don’t want anything fancy, just music. I don’t want all the bells and whistles of my phone, just music.

    • Ilovemyirishtemper@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      Ditto. I feel like I’m the only one who still listens to the radio in my car. The only thing I want my car to have that it doesn’t is cruise control. Otherwise, she’s perfect.

      • catloaf@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        My car has a tape deck and a CD player!

        I still use the radio most often. Usually public radio on the way to work, and college radio if they’re playing anything interesting, or the local rock or pop station if they’re not. I’m not going to discover anything new through Spotify, so if I’m going to listen to stuff I’ve heard plenty of times before, the radio is easier.

  • edric@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    I actually like big screens on infotainment systems, especially the ones that integrate into the dash and not the ones where it looks like they just stuck a tablet on top of the dash. I have a Subaru and it has a nice vertical 11in screen. I also like the design of the new Hyundai and Kia screens that run across the dash.

    Having said that, those screens should strictly be for that purpose, infotainment. Anything that controls essential functions should still be physical buttons, levers, and dials.

    I was excited when Volvo announced they were going to release an affordable subcompact SUV EV, then saw they put almost everything on the infotainment screen in the middle of the dash, even the speedometer!

    • tal@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      So what did they put there instead of the spedometer?

      kagis

      I guess this is the EX30. It looks like it doesn’t have a driver’s side display. Weird.

      considers

      I guess it saves some money, but yeah, that doesn’t seem like a reasonable tradeoff. There are displays that I want to have readily-accessible all the time.

      And, I mean, what does an LCD screen cost? $100 or something? It can’t save all that much.

  • NuXCOM_90Percent@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    What bothers me the most (aside from getting rid of all knobs and physical buttons…) is that I bought a car the better part of a decade ago with Android Auto. And it is awesome. It is everything I want in a car “entertainment” system and it makes it trivial to navigate and listen to music.

    So… of course car companies are going out of their way to block that and apple auto. Because they want subscription fees.

    • IMongoose@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      I just got a new car. I get a text message. I click play on the main menu. It tells me I need a subscription to listen to text messages. I open up android auto, click play. It plays. WEIRD.

  • AFK BRB Chocolate@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    Some is great and much appreciated. For instance I love the things that takes the camera feeds and creates a simulated top down view. But some things are just useless and needless.

      • AFK BRB Chocolate@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        It kicks on when you’re parking, so you can see your car in a top-down view with all the lines and obstacles. When I drive our other car that doesn’t have it, it’s the thing I miss the most.

    • NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      I really wish that wasn’t under patent :(

      Every car should have that if they got the cameras, but it’s lame you gotta pay someone else if you want to stitch the photos together