• linearchaos@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      The funniest thing about this is a anovas app is practically f****** useless.

      It has maybe two thirds of the things I ever want to cook in it. I end up looking times and temperatures up on the internet anyway. And it’s maximum utility is to set the temperature and timer which you can do from the unit itself easily. Honestly more easily.

  • macarthur_park@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    I have one of these. The sous vide cooker itself is very nice and easy to use, I’d highly recommend it. The app is a bit clunky and not necessary to use the device. I certainly wouldn’t pay $2 a month for it.

    The app lets you set a temperature and cook time, but you can also do this using the buttons on the cooker. Sometimes the WiFi pairing is finicky, so honestly I skip the app half the time. The app also lets you view and write recipes. I guess the big advantage is you can click “start cooking” and it automatically sets the device temp and time, but doing it manually isn’t much harder. I’m also not wowed by the in-app recipe selection, and generally just get recipes from the internet.

  • partial_accumen@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    For those of us on Android, can’t we download the old APK which still talks Bluetooth and just never interact with the web/wifi for these?

  • Codilingus@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    I have one of their’s that can connect to your phone. It’s not needed, it just adds extra cook book functions. It even hosts it so you can control the sous vide when you’re not at home, almost like a reverse proxy.

    But yea the physical buttons work fine without the app.

    • roofuskit@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      My car works fine without a seat warmer, but if you sold it to me as part of the car then later it started charging me a subscription I’d be pretty pissed.

      • Voroxpete@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        Yeah, I barely use the app, but this is a bullshit anti-consumer move that leaves me with zero reason to trust the company going forward.

    • fatalicus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      What I like about having the Bluetooth connection to the app, is mostly just to see when the water has come up to temperature.

      But that was apparently too much to ask, since it says that they are also removing the Bluetooth functionality from the app…

    • Ebby@lemmy.ssba.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      The original models will. While Home assistant has an Anova integration, it is cloud dependent and it’s the cloud that will discontinue support. As I understand it.

      Local control uses a Bluetooth bridge which I guess is my next project.

      • The Pantser@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        BT Proxy Bridges are super easy to make. Just flash a esp32 with the premade package and power it. I have one on every room of my house just so whatever I have will just work everywhere.

        • ashok36@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 months ago

          This is lemmy and so I understand it but flashing an esp32 is not super easy for 99.9% of the population.

        • Ebby@lemmy.ssba.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 months ago

          Yup! I have the stuff, just haven’t gotten around to flashing one yet. Working on a wind meter at the moment.

  • palordrolap@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    Cost or no cost, IoT should not be able to brick devices on the whim - or unexpected dissolution - of a faceless corporation.

    Unfortunately too many people are trusting of monolithic entities which promise the moon and then decide what they really meant was “bend over”.

    I may be channelling a bit of Louis Rossman here.

    That said, the other comments here suggest that the device in question still has all features when accessed from the front panel, which is a step up from a lot of other IoT behaviour. Owners who don’t want to pay for the app should still disconnect it from any connectivity and keep it that way just in case the manufacturer decides to remove that functionality as well.

    And if it stops working altogether without network connectivity, take the L and maybe mail it back to the company’s head office with no return address. Let them deal with the e-waste.

  • Vanth@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    I was given one of those. I tried the app once and immediately uninstalled it. It’s worthless. The “let’s put AI in your computer mouse, toothbrush, and toilet scrubber!” of ten years ago.

  • auzy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    Oh ffs… This is the one I have…

    And, you know what? The firmware sucks.

    You can’t even connect to wifi if you have two AP’s with the same name (which is literally everyone).

    I haven’t even installed the app in ages because it’s a PITA and has never worked 100%.

    But, they can guarantee my next one won’t be an anova again. There are much cheaper alternatives now

      • 0ops@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        Oi bruv, it’s anova kitchin appluiance asking for moy woyfoy passwood.

        Damn autocorrect was fighting me on every word lol

      • auzy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        Did you read the article?

        I haven’t tested the cheaper Amazon ones. They probably don’t have Bluetooth but they probably work the same.

        But the wifi on my ANOVA has sucked since the beginning. I’ve never really been able to use it. No way I’m paying a subscription fee for something that should have worked since the beginning and still barely works. And bluetooth is pointless because I can’t start cooking when I drive home

        In fact, I should have returned it given that it is normal for houses to have multiple wifi access points

        I suspect that maybe the cheaper units which hit the market is maybe now why they’re struggling

  • harsh3466@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    Translation:

    “Fuck you for not replacing your perfectly fine and still working 10 year old machine and making our line go up more. We’re gonna do our best to brick it because we want all of your money.”

    Fuck capitalism. I will (and have been) doing my absolute to avoid buying any kind of physical device that requires an app to function

    • primrosepathspeedrun@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      if I see something requires an app, no matter how good it is otherwise. the product is dead to me. I know it is, effectively, going to break within a year or two.

      • TheIllustrativeMan@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        I’m getting that same way.

        Currently trying to chase down some automatic sun shades that don’t need an app to do time-based cycles. Shouldn’t be this hard, but every band wants you to use absolute garbage apps.

        • primrosepathspeedrun@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 months ago

          you never know for sure until you try though, so if it requires an app, it’s dead to me and I don’t trust anything else the company makes.

          if it has an API i get very wet very fast.

          • kjaeselrek@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            4 months ago

            That’s fair, but the point I was trying to make was that I have tried and, for the one I’ve got at least, the app isn’t required. I’m not trying to defend them or anything, I just thought it was worth mentioning.

            Tbh I’m kinda glad it doesn’t have an API, because I’d end up wasting a lot of time playing with it haha.

          • linearchaos@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            4 months ago

            About two phone changes ago I never reinstalled the anova app.

            It’s like pressing the buttons on top of the cooker with extra steps.

            • primrosepathspeedrun@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              4 months ago

              yeah there are apps I want on my phone, but if anything says ‘there is an app’ I’m instantly averse.

              even the things I do want phone apps for, I have to browse on fdroid because default options are all terrible. basic shit like file browsers and media players in commercial OS’s are just, like, vile and do not function. even if I didn’t care about the endoscopes they try to snake up every orifice, they are deliberately nonfunctional.

    • __init__@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      I will (and have been) doing my absolute to avoid buying any kind of physical device that requires an app to function

      Same. It’s becoming more difficult every day.

      • FMEEE@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        And that’s so sad. There are a lot of (mainly Elderly people) who don’t even have a smartphone who now often can’t use the most basic stuff necessary because it needs an app.

        • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 months ago

          A lot of this stuff is only useful if you have money, anyway. And poverty rates among the elderly have been climbing since the Housing Crash of '08

          • SkyNTP@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            4 months ago

            I’ve said this before, I’m going to say it again: people with money spend it to save time.

            Managing 2FA, software updates, account signin, device pairing, billing, privacy policy updates, cookie notices… This shit does not save people time. It does the complete opposite.

            These products are not built for consumers. These products are purely anticompetitive schemes, propping up crappy business models, trying to cash in on the data harvesting gold rush.

            • primrosepathspeedrun@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              4 months ago

              I’ve been screaming this at the top of my lungs for 20 years, and oh my god the “I told you so”'s I get to say now feel SO good.

              i mean, I don’t have any friends anymore, so mostly im just calling up people who hate me now and saying “I told you so”, but, like I DID, so, worth.

              I mean, not, like, ‘worth’ in the sense that anything in my life works or wasn’t torn apart by my adherence to materialism and avoidance of dark patterns, but, like, you know, feels good for a few minutes when they haven’t changed their number.

            • experbia@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              4 months ago

              These products are not built for consumers.

              they’re often built for investors. they are feasible enough products that some people will even buy them, so you get investors. then, the thing is always just “one more issue we need to fix” away from “mass adoption”, “for real this time”… to keep milking the investors as long as possible.

    • stealth_cookies@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      I mean it is shitty still, but people with an old device and an account already are unaffected, plus the old devices like the one I have is completely operable offline. I’ve not connected it to WiFi except when I first got it to check the app out.

    • Imgonnatrythis@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      Yeah, I need to start being better about this. It’s a shame because I bought my joule sous vide because I like the simplicity and ability to monitor and program it remotely (helpful when cooking for 5-6h). App stopped working properly and now they’ve been purchased by breville and if I want to use it I need to switch and I’m guessing it won’t be long before they start to drop functionallity or require some sort of subscription. There are things like this where the app is much more than a gimmick. But it sucks to have some company pulling the strings of what you can or can’t do with your own hardware.