• BigBenis@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    Airliner ticket prices used to be regulated. So when all airlines had to charge the same price, they had to find other ways to be competitive in order to bring in customers. Deregulation in the 70s brought ticket costs down but that means ticket cost is now the primary point of competition between airlines and amenities now come at a steep premium.

    • SupraMario@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Yep, you can have it one way or the other…cheap flights or super luxury and only the rich can fly. Planes are not cheap to operate and fuel isn’t free.

      • MirthfulAlembic@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        Frankly for short haul flights it makes sense. Would it be worth paying double or triple for a three hour flight just to get a full meal? Anyone who truly wants a taste of old time flying can get that with a first class ticket, both in terms of cost and quality.

      • BigBenis@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        I’m not so sure that is a positive. Airplanes are huge emission drivers and our dependence on the convenience of air travel has caused us to cease investment and innovation in other more efficient and environmentally friendly methods of travel.

        No doubt there’d be a lot more support for high speed rails if airplanes weren’t as accessible. IMO airplanes should only really be used for intercontinental travel.

        • Bytemeister@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          Ελληνικά
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          When you factor in the number of people the airplane carries, they are about 3 times more efficient than a car with one person in it.

            • Bytemeister@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              Ελληνικά
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              2 months ago

              Just saying, compared to driving, airplanes are usually better. Also trains in the US suck. Much slower, and almost comparable in price to air travel.

              • BigBenis@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                2 months ago

                Also trains in the US suck. Much slower, and almost comparable in price to air travel.

                It doesn’t have to be that way, many other countries have solved those issues. But because we’ve leaned so heavily on air travel to get us to places only a few hours away by land there hasn’t been any incentive to innovate or invest in other forms of long-distance mass transit.

          • BigBenis@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 months ago

            Are you saying a high speed train to your destination wouldn’t also solve that problem? It would likely end up being cheaper to travel via rail considering the lower costs of maintenance and fuel, meaning further accessibility than we have today with our dependence on air travel.

              • BigBenis@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                2 months ago

                That’s fair, and please note that I mentioned air travel has its place in intercontinental travel in my previous comment. The whole point I’m trying to make is that domestic flights between areas that could support high speed land travel infrastructure are wasteful.

                • aidan@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  2 months ago

                  Even within continents, high speed rail is expensive, many cities and towns aren’t large enough or near large enough cities to make it practical. This would mean distant connections on slow trains and very long journeys.

  • chemicalprophet@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    Because our children’s children will still be paying the tab for that unsustainable opulence. Fuck they’ll be paying the bill for recreational air travel with only pretzels.

  • netvor@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    They used to be also fascinated by plastic.

    I bet their smiles would not last long realizing that the 5g bag of pretzels has 2g of plastic (and that’s just the tip of the plastiberg).

  • umbraroze@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    Meanwhile, me aboard a train: “Oh you can get whole massive meals on restaurant cars these days? No thank you, I’ll get a coffee and one of those overpriced naff sandwiches.” (Well, the Finnish train sandwiches are pretty good, but they are hella overpriced. Like 7€. WTF.)

    • stringere@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      7 Euros = 7.55 USD That is a pretty normal price for a sandwich in the USA. I wish I considered that overpriced. 5 or more years ago I probably would have said that was overpriced.

      • Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        they’re overpriced in the sense that a sandwich does not in any universe cost that much to actually produce, not in the sense that they charge more than other people do for sandwiches.

        7 euros isn’t too much more than what a sandwich can tend to cost at Pressbyrån in sweden, which is infamous for charging out the ass for everything just because they can. A normal grocery store that carries some premade sandwiches might charge more like 5 euro for them.

  • Snapz@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago
    • That tray table is WAYYYYY too big and luxurious.

    • That cup is about double the size they give now.

    • You didn’t get to pick those pretzels, there was just the single “choice” now.

    • Also, you didn’t get to pick that seat and you had to have last minute anxiety that you wouldn’t even be assigned a seat by the gate agent at the airport (after already taking time off from work to travel and committing $100+ for uber or airport parking)

    • You also paid at least an extra $100 to have a carryon bag (more depending on your route) and even more for a checked bag.

    • shitty rental car at your destination now costs $100/day and parking at your hotel is not free, and is in fact $30-$50 additional per night.

    • And your garbage hotel room costs 3X what it should.

      • Snapz@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        It doesn’t though with the basic fares now. Boarding pass has “see gate agent” printed where a seat assignment would be. And no guarantee of a couple/family being seated together.

        Also always rumors of airlines testing stacked or standing seats to cram even more people in each plane.

          • Snapz@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 months ago

            Depends on the market probably, but a lot of spots it’s like $50-$100 extra, each way, to upgrade to the seat level that let’s you choose a seat. Frontier and spirit used to be the joke, but most of them are doing it now. Cliche joke used to be that they’d charge you each time you used the bathroom (maybe they actually happened in Europe, Ryanair?) But like too many things, we’re close to living the onion.

  • Blackmist@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    Good old airlines and their ideal business model:

    Charge you like you’re flying on Concorde.

    Treat you like you’re on a 16th century slaving ship.

  • Todd Bonzalez@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    Airlines were not more luxurious 50 years ago.

    You had more legroom and the TSA didn’t exist, but everything else was way worse.

  • RadioFreeArabia@lemmy.cafe
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    As far as I know, economy seats are still sold at a loss. They make up for it in the higher classes. I don’t fly through Doha often but when I do, I do like getting on Qatar Airways.