• inclementimmigrant@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    I thought X got rid of all of the sane policies that twitter had?

    I mean isn’t X officially a white supremacist platform now anyways?

    • xenoclast@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      And EVERY single news organization in the US uses it both as their primary platform AND source for news.

      Even fucking NPR. What the actual fuck is that about ?

      90% of screenshots on Lemmy are from Twitter ffs. It boggles my mind, and I am not easily boggled.

    • Psythik@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Musky wanted to do that but Europe threatened to ban Twitter so now he just pretends that there are rules.

  • hushable@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    everyday I’m thankful that Musk is not an US born citizen and cannot run for office. It’s the only thing stopping him

  • ObsidianZed@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    The video mimics Ms. Harris’s voice, but instead of using her words from the original ad, it has the vice president saying that President Biden is senile, that she does not “know the first thing about running the country” and that, as a woman and a person of color, she is the “ultimate diversity hire.”

    Here you go.

    • Grandwolf319@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      I think a nickname like diversity hire Kamala would the best they could do. However it’s not a great nickname cause all she had to do is talk a little, sound competent and the name kind of falls apart.

      Still better than laughing Kamala, that just sounds like a children’s toy.

    • hoshikarakitaridia@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      God that’s bad. This is what I’d expected Russian trolls to do on Lemmy before getting down voted into oblivion, but I wouldn’t expect a CEO to do this. This is fucked up.

  • _sideffect@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    This is what Biden should have been doing since 2020, it wouldn’t even have been a close race.

  • SteefLem@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    That name should be some sort of verb or something, “lets not Musk this up” or “are you really that Musk?” I dunno something like that

  • mPony@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    Next thing you know, Musky will order staff to create entirely false tweets on official accounts and lock the accounts so the false tweets can’t be deleted. He will burn that entire company to the ground to get TFG back in.

  • x00z@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    I hate it when these articles never include the video. How am I supposed to learn about manipulation if I’m “being protected against it”?

    • sem@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      You can find it without them boosting it for free. But you don’t have to watch it to understand the story

  • sundray@lemmus.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    in Seeming Violation of X’s Policies

    But of course. That is why he bought the company – to become un-bannable.

    • Grandwolf319@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      more or less unethical.

      Even before that, it just funnels value from users to a monopoly that does not innovate or improve user experience. It’s like the freemium model without much benefit in exchange for your data.

    • Fisk400@feddit.nu
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      A lot of sites have weight. Twitter sheds users every day but the large user count makes it attractive to public figures and if you want to follow that public figure you need to have twitter.

      • SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        Yeah but to me it’s insane that public people that have publicists or companies that have communications staff simply don’t cross post to multiple sites.

        Sure for a regular person that’s a lot of work to do when just posting a random thought. But for someone who’s job involves posting things to social media? Most of the work is coming up with the copy. Once that’s done it’s just copying and pasting to different sites.

      • grue@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        That’s why the more prominent the public figure is, the bigger ethical obligation they have to switch to Mastodon and force their followers to follow.

    • Maxnmy's@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Twitter just has too much momentum. It’s unshakable from its cultural position as it is now. It will take more than the alt-right openly congregating in their own circles to scare ordinary people away.

      • fine_sandy_bottom@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        I disagree.

        If anything the momentum is moving against it. The only question is how long it will take for alternatives to become viable and / or for twitter to lose its network effect.

        Presently its only the inertia of users maintaining the network effect.

        When the owner starts publishing misinformation I’m order to manipulate an election, that’s something more than merely a consideration of features, users, and UX. Users really ought to emphatically withdraw their support, even in cases where it may be inconvenient.

    • KroninJ@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      I use it to keep up with Street Fighter pros.

      And watch a little of the dumpster fire burn. I report all of Musks posts that break policy and kinda surprised my account isn’t suspended yet.

    • brbposting@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      “Less unethical” if you’re a journalist. Investigative reporters can visit nazi bars with 335m people if they bring us the goods about what the nazis are saying!

      • fine_sandy_bottom@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        Sure I guess.

        I have the luxury of not having to decide.

        I’m not going to judge someone who feels they absolutely need to participate on twitter in order to avoid poverty.

        I certainly wouldn’t like to do that myself.

    • brbposting@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      3 Qs:

      1. Musk sux

      2. If you advised Kamala and she created a Mastodon account and tried to funnel people there, but not everyone left, would you advise her to at least post screenshots of her Mastodon posts or “see my post about $subject on Masto here: $url” whenever she had something to say?

      3. If you’re Kamala and your crystal ball proved posting on the dumpster fire site would bring you the one extra voter who will sway the election - would you take a utilitarian approach and keep dumpsterposting?

      • fine_sandy_bottom@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        if Kampala staying on Twitter meant winning the election then sure.

        It’s my strongly held opinion that it won’t significantly effect the outcome. A savvy media team could play it to her advantage.

        Honestly how many swing voters are going to follow Kamala.

  • biggerbogboy@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    If my younger self from like 3 years ago heard generating videos can be a prompt away and can make gigantic amounts of misinformation, he would shit himself and probably write a manifesto, but fuck me this is still insane today!

    • Timecircleline@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      I can’t tell whether 3 years ago you were pre-potty training but fully literate, or whether you’ve simultaneously learned better emotional regulation and sphincter control in the past few years.

      • AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        People tend to change more, psychologically speaking, between 18-25. They might have been 17-18 three years ago. Makes sense with the manifesto comment.