• ashok36@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    To paraphrase margery tyrell, “He doesn’t care about the consequences because he doesn’t intent to suffer them.”

    Trump has fallen ass backwards into a perpetual get out of jail free card. Is it any wonder he acts with impunity when events time after time prove that he is effectively immune from all but the most trivial inconveniences?

    I’ve never been more glad to be child free.

    • Tiefling IRL@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      I know a couple who’s having a kid in 4 weeks. Lovely people, but by the gods the worst fucking time to be born. I feel bad for their kid.

      • tiredofsametab@kbin.run
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        I’m an '80s kid and definitely care about Regan and his impact. He was president for a large chunk of my childhood. I remember some of the later times he was on the news. His impact has forever changed American politics.

          • ashok36@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            4 months ago

            I was born in 81 and definitely knew who Reagan was growing up. I distinctly remember his TV address after challenger exploded.

          • tiredofsametab@kbin.run
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            4 months ago

            We sat around, even when I was young, watching the news every night with my family whilst eating. I can tell you I remember some things from the end of his presidency. Right after it, when the Berlin came down, I remember watching the news about it as we were actually at my grandparent’s house for dinner that night. On the other hand, I don’t remember the challenger explosion even though I was in gradeschool at the time. Maybe I’ve just forgotten about it as an adult now in my 40s.

            We also had mock elections in gradeschool with the actual presidential candidates. I did misunderstand it and my parents refused to believe, as I did, that I had actually voted and found it hilarious.

  • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    In a ruling Monday, Cannon said the appointment of special counsel Jack Smith violated the Constitution.

    “In the end, it seems the Executive’s growing comfort in appointing ‘regulatory’ special counsels in the more recent era has followed an ad hoc pattern with little judicial scrutiny,” Cannon wrote.

    So she wants a judge to say an investigator can be appointed to gather information to take to a judge?

    This is obviously just some Sneeches bullshit. You could just as well argue before it can be brought to a judge, an investigation needs to be done to gather evidence.

    So I guess more like chicken and egg.

    • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      Honestly, I’m surprised she didn’t just say it was legal because he was still the president since the election was a fraud and the president can do things like that.

  • dogslayeggs@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    Are you fucking kidding? So special attorneys, which have been used by pretty much every administration and every congress since the position was created, are not valid now?

    I’m not a law expert, but was the way she dismissed it make it so he can’t be charged again in either another jurisdiction or by the appropriate (in her mind) prosecution team?

    • homura1650@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      Also not an expert, but I don’t think so.

      The big threat of that would be a dismissal after a jury was sworn. At that point, jeopardy attached, so rebringing the case could be unconditional under the double jeopardy clause [0].

      The virtually unappealable way to do this would be to wait until the prosecution finishes their case. At that point, the defense will file a routine motion for a directed verdict that judges routinely deny. The defense gets to do that again after presenting their case. In either case, the judge granting the motion is not apealable.

      The judge could wait until after a verdict and issue a judgement not withstanding verdict, but that is appealable.

      [0] Not always though. A mistrial from a hung Jury can always be retired. Other forms of mistrial may be retryable depending on the facts.

    • ralphio@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      was the way she dismissed it make it so he can’t be charged again in either another jurisdiction or by the appropriate (in her mind) prosecution team?

      I don’t think so, it would have said dismissed with prejudice if so.

        • Schadrach@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 months ago

          Given her argument for dismissing it was that the DOJ was incompetent and didn’t use the right kind of prosecutor, that seems fitting.

    • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      So special attorneys, which have been used by pretty much every administration and every congress since the position was created, are not valid now?

      Yep. Good luck to the Trump administration trying to enforce anything between this an Chevron.

      • PugJesus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        Yep. Good luck to the Trump administration trying to enforce anything between this an Chevron.

        That presumes the law means anything to them.

        As this ruling shows, law means nothing to the Republican party.

        • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 months ago

          I am trying to keep “hopeful” that they’ll stick to their Project 2025 plans in the sense that they’ll try to do it through legal shenanigans and loopholes rather than just sending out the Gestapo and keeping everyone in their homes with machine guns.

          • Jessica@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            4 months ago

            We should all arm ourselves now. Every single bit of this is unprecedented, in the worst possible way. Better to be safe than staring down the barrel of a Luger.

            • peopleproblems@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              4 months ago

              Counterpoint: if you are staring down the barrel of a Luger, I would suggest NOT doing what they tell you to do.

              The Nazis had a habit of forcing someone at gunpoint to do something worse than getting shot. Like telling you to bite the curb, or kill your friend, then they shoot you.

    • Maggoty@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      Yup, Trump is getting free from his worst case on a novel technicality.

      BuT tHe lAw pRoTecTs Us aLL eQuaLlY111

    • teamevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      Because the Nazis are trying to steal the country and there have been 0 consequences for Thomas while he’s actively taking bribes and encouraging this bullshit.

  • BigMacHole@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    Republicans: Make themselves above the Law while Endangering US National Security. Also Republicans: Why are people trying to Assassinate us?

      • Billiam@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        Fascists rely on you being a decent person in indecent times. They’re counting on Biden not using the full extent of the powers the office of the President has been granted because it’s so far beyond the pale.

          • NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            4 months ago

            The senate literally did this with appointing a Supreme Court Justice during an election year. That’s how Amy got put in place.

            • lordkuri@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              4 months ago

              appointing a Supreme Court Justice during an election year

              FTFY. Voting had already started when they rammed the handmaid in there to replace Ginsburg.

          • memfree@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            4 months ago

            They already did! The ‘presidential immunity’ ruling they recently made basically said that if a President does it, we (SCOTUS) will decide if it is an official act, and if it is, then the Prez is blameless, but if we say the act isn’t ‘official’ then WE will tell you the Prez is a baddie.

  • nifty@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    What a nonsense decision, it should be appealed at the very least

    Edit a lot has happened so let’s bring some context to this: Hilary Clinton was derided as unfit for presidency because she had a secure server in her private space for emails, some of which were classified.

    Meanwhile, Trump literally had boxes of classified documents in a bathroom. Republicans are duplicitous, hypocritical and should not be expected to operate on good will.

    Or if they’re not, then they should show some objectivity and apply the same standards everywhere. What a bunch of clowns

    • RagingRobot@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      Yeah our county is getting worse. You really stuck it to me! I hope you realize that it’s getting worse for you too. Next time a Democrat commits a crime they have a way out of it now. That’s not really something I wanted and I don’t think you really do either.

    • Captainvaqina@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      Yep every American patriot hates the corrupt pieces of trash “judges” that the traitor installed, as they are ripping apart the rule of law and destroying the illusion of a justice system in favor of a felon.

      Enjoy your fascist bootlicking, you absolute piece of anti-American trash.

  • RattlerSix@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    In the immunity case, when all the other judges were writing opinions about that case, Clarence Thomas wrote an opinion about a totally different case, this one. He was signaling her to dismiss the case.

    I’m so sick of these corrupt motherfuckers

      • TallonMetroid@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        Quite honestly, something like this has been pretty obviously coming from the get go. Cannon has consistently made no effort to hide the fact that she’s bought and paid for and was presiding over the case in bad faith.