• digger@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    The group used “sophisticated computer scripts” and software to scour piracy services… for illegal copies of TV episodes, which they then downloaded and hosted on Jetflicks’ servers.

    So they used some variant of Sick Beard?

    • bitchkat@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      If you’re using sickbeard, switch to medusa. The originally developer of sickbeard is a nut case. He took the project back from the team that was doing development so they forked it and renamed Medusa.

    • aodhsishaj@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      nah probably the arr stack

      Sonarr: (Automatic TV series downloads)

      Radarr: (Automatic movie downloads)

      Tdarr: (Automatic transcoding of media, can help save you a lot of disk space)

      Bazarr: (Companion app to Radarr and Sonarr, manages subtitles)

      Prowlarr: (A replacement for Jackett from the Arr team)

      Lidarr: Music

      Readarr: Books

      Mylar3: Comic books

      Plex-Meta-Manager: (Automatic collections and metadata)

      Overseerr: Request tracking and website front-end

      Ombi: Let users request both movies/tv shows from a simple web interface.

      Dopplarr: Discord bot to make movie/tv/anime requests

      Pulsarr: Browser extension for adding movies to Radarr or Series’ to Sonarr while browsing IMDB or TVDB.

      • Darkassassin07@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        Tdarr: (Automatic transcoding of media, can help save you a lot of disk space)

        That’s a new one to me, I’ll have to check that out. Thanks!

        Been doing conversions via Emby, but it’s not a very powerful tool for that.

  • el_abuelo@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    This is despicable. What specific service was this? So I know how to avoid it if it should resurface.

  • Dorkyd68@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    The only thing I’m pisseed about is the fact that I was unaware of its existence. Fuck the system

  • Fedizen@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    They’re here doing everyone a service. Why are there resources to prosecute this but not like elon musk’s insider trading?

  • deweydecibel@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    All the comments in here are so damn tedious. Copyright is a mess, but holy shit, people tie themselves in knots to make excuses for pirates being careless and stupid

  • Blackmist@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    If five people can maintain a service bigger than all those combined, then the big streamers need to buck their fucking ideas up.

  • Uriel238 [all pronouns]@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Jetflicks, which charged $9.99 per month for the streaming service, generated millions of dollars in subscription revenue and caused “substantial harm to television program copyright owners,

    The ownership class will tremble before a communist revolution!

      • aidan@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        To be fair, the service they provide isn’t hosting the videos, it’s making them, which I assume costs a bit more

        • Cosmicomical@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          To be fairer nobody asked them to produce content. They decided to create it because it’s cheaper that licensing the actual good stuff.

          • aidan@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            eh some of it is good, I personally wouldn’t want to just watched licensed shows from 50 years ago

            • Uriel238 [all pronouns]@lemmy.blahaj.zone
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              1 year ago

              Hence why copyright was originally in the 10-20 year range.

              Movie star isn’t supposed to be a dream job that makes you fabulously rich, but a decent living.

              Interestingly, musical artists who work off the web will do exactly that: Tour and make hundreds of thousands instead of millions (in the aughts and 2010s, so pre-inflation), rather than rolling the dice with the record labels.

              • aidan@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                1 year ago

                Movie star isn’t supposed to be a dream job that makes you fabulously rich, but a decent living.

                I mean, supposed to according to who?

                • Uriel238 [all pronouns]@lemmy.blahaj.zone
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Capitalist ideologues, for one. I remember in Macroeconomics class that wealth desparity will destroy your economy and then your civilization if you let it get out of hand.

                  So when (for example) we have eight guys that own more than the poorer half of the world population, that’s a bad sign for every economy on the planet, and is going to cause way more problems than merely discontent and social unrest.

        • Uriel238 [all pronouns]@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          The service they provide (from a perspective external to obligatory capitalism) is less about making them, but providing a framework by which people engaged in artistic expression and development get paid and permitted to survive.

          As the COVID-19 Lockdown furloughs demonstrated to us, art manifests so long as people are fed and need something to do. Healthy humans can’t couch-potato for two weeks without fidgeting and whittling wood into bears. And the great resignation that followed showed that enough people were able to make it lucrative (that is, work out marketing and fulfillment enough to make it profitable enough to quit their prior job) that it lowered worker supply that we were able to contest the shit treatment, low pay and toxic work environments that were normal before the epidemic.

          It gets worse in other industries like big pharma in which the state provides vast grants for R&D of drugs and treatments, but the company keeps all the proceeds. Contrast the space program, which is why memory foam (the material) is in the public domain, as is a fuckton of electronics and computer technologies.

          • aidan@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 year ago

            The service they provide (from a perspective external to obligatory capitalism) is less about making them, but providing a framework by which people engaged in artistic expression and development get paid and permitted to survive.

            If it is art that other people value then that framework already existed(and there are many others who created similar tools for it) so I don’t see it as particularly valuable.

            Contrast the space program, which is why memory foam (the material) is in the public domain, as is a fuckton of electronics and computer technologies.

            There is a compelling argument that tens of billions of dollars being used productively to research anything would have at least some useful results. Memory foam, cordless drills, etc could have been developed much more cheaply than the Apollo program, GPS is extremely valuable, but Apollo wasn’t a necessary precursor to geostationary orbit.

            • Uriel238 [all pronouns]@lemmy.blahaj.zone
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              1 year ago

              If it is art that other people value then that framework already existed

              From Wikipedia on Vincent Van Gogh: Van Gogh’s work began to attract critical artistic attention in the last year of his life. After his death, Van Gogh’s art and life story captured public imagination as an emblem of misunderstood genius

              The art we get from pre-made frameworks emerged because people figured out they like art, and then someone capitalized on that. Or in cases of monarchs and governments, they created a fund to allow artists to do their thing instead of waiting tables.

              There is a compelling argument that tens of billions of dollars being used productively to research anything would have at least some useful results.

              For every $1 spent on the moonshots, we got $14. Feel free to look for other investments, but big science really has proven itself.

              • aidan@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                1 year ago

                From Wikipedia on Vincent Van Gogh: Van Gogh’s work began to attract critical artistic attention in the last year of his life. After his death, Van Gogh’s art and life story captured public imagination as an emblem of misunderstood genius

                I don’t really understand how this follows from what I said.

                For every $1 spent on the moonshots, we got $14. Feel free to look for other investments, but big science really has proven itself.

                Do you have a source for that? (And what that claim actually means), afterall, plenty of “essential” inventions in the modern day(including the base of modern rocketry) came from weapons development- does that make war a good investment? (Of course its not 1-to-1 because war is destructive, but my point is putting a lot of effort and smart people into almost anything will lead to a lot of innovation)

      • aidan@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        To be fair, the service they provide isn’t hosting the videos, it’s making them, which I assume costs a bit more

    • GroundedGator@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      caused “substantial harm to television program copyright owners,_

      Maybe? People willing to copy and distribute this content will always be around and you will never catch them all. People willing to pay a discount or seek not and find said content will always be around. And there will be those who will watch a show or a movie because it is freely available, who would never pay a dime for it.

      They will never end piracy and I’d argue it might actually be bad for business if they did.

  • shortwavesurfer@monero.town
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    It’s sad that these people got taken down. Maybe the next people to do it will do it from a country that does not have extradition with the United States, so they would be safe.

  • Etterra@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Farewell heroes. I may not have heard of you before, but I shall mourn your departure nevertheless.

  • fartington@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    I don’t understand why you would pay for an illegal service when the other options are to pay legally or pirate.

    • polonius-rex@kbin.run
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      because piracy is a service problem

      if a pirate service legitimately offers a better service than netflix, hulu, vudu and prime video combined, why would you pay for any of those four?

    • Lemminary@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      My guess is It’s probably cheaper and has much greater variety. You can watch anything from any streaming service through one single interface at the price of one service.

    • sunzu@kbin.run
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      piracy is a service issue.

      also, fuck IP owners, pigs got too fat while cutting on service.

    • shortwavesurfer@monero.town
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      My guess is because they did all the pirating for you so you didn’t have to worry about dealing with the technical hurdles of doing so.

    • kakes@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Because all the legal services are incredibly anti-consumer and are offering less services, with (more) ads, for more money every year.

      • A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        The entire system exists for the benefit of business, not customers.

        Just look at what happens with accused theft in a store. You get accused of theft? Cops are there in no time, take you to the ground, throw you in the back of the cop car. only after they’ve gotten the humiliation and brutalization in might someone come and take your proof that you didnt steal anything.

        You accuse the store of stealing from you? Due to not following their own policy on returns, or overcharging and an item and not fixing it Police won’t even show. just tell you its a civil matter and to suck it up.

    • slurpinderpin@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      because IPTV is like $6 per month and has every single channel known to earth… it’s a tiny fraction compared to any cable especially if you watch sports (the only real reason to pay for cable anyway)

    • A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      I dont subscribe to any streaming service (except the occasional free prime trial, to be full disclosure), not even the one in the news story… but I can still answer your question…

      Because I want to pay a single service to watch everything. Like Netflix used to be. Watch everything I want, for one monthly price that was reasonable.

      But its not like that anymore. Every company looked at how well Netflix used to do, went “Fuck them! I want all that money for my self!” and took their content off Netflix, and made their own streaming services.

      Now if you want to consume any media, You have to subscribe to 50 different subscription services, for hundreds of dollars a month, Which is just Cable 2.0 but with worse service and options.

    • exanime@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Pirating implies some knowledge and effort some people may not have or want to get into

      Paid Legal services are so enshitified some people may think they are getting ripped up

      Paid illegal services are often HUGE bang for buck value (no enshitification, no limits, no nonsense and often better customer service)

    • jonne@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      You pay like $5/Mo for the content of all streaming services and more instead of the $500/Mo it would cost to subscribe to each of them individually. Plus you’re not taking any legal risk as a customer.

    • Darkassassin07@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Because the legal options are garbage.

      The pirates provide a better service with more content for cheaper than the legal options; and pirating yourself takes effort as well as cost (hardware, trackers, usenet, etc).

      Some people are happy to just pay for decent service; others like to learn about the process, then setup and run their own servers.

      To each their own.

    • fine_sandy_bottom@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      The majority of piracy is not free.

      I’ve paid for usenet, seed boxes, private servers, and more recently torrent cache services.

      You pay because it’s much cheaper than commercial services and a better experience with more content.

    • sic_semper_tyrannis@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      In addition to other things people responded with, piracy services tend to not collect users data or prevent us from watching with a VPN enabled.

      • Saik0@lemmy.saik0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        or prevent us from watching with a VPN enabled.

        Man this one chaff’s me the most. I way a paying Netflix customer like 8 years ago. I had IPv6 setup as a 6rd tunnel through HE (Hurricane Electric) because my ISP didn’t offer IPv6. Netflix treated that as a VPN and blocked me as a paying customer… Even though I lived/payed from the same fucking locale. It’s not like I was using a VPN to bypass a Geoblock. I was just making IPv6 available to myself. I cancelled because of that. You do not get to tell me how I access the internet at large, especially when I’m not even being shady about it.

  • Snapz@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Nobody gives a shit, you’re not doing enough to punish trump for his obvious, literally filmed and recorded crimes.

    This is the equivalent of the cops celebrating after bearing peaceful college protesters while pissing their pants and freezing while the uvalde kids were slaughtered and psychologically tortured.

    You’re focusing on the non victory and ignoring the failures. Cowards.