• Spaz@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    8 hours ago

    I have a video recording of the ceo in a company wide meeting saying he will not enforce rto as that ship already sailed and wr will stay remote. Then 2 months later, enforces rto in email selectively to people that are within 25 miles of an office. I then asked him and gave him the video asking him about why he lied and have a screenshot of his dumbass resppnse about things shifting and blah blah. Took him 10 minutes to write his 6 sentence long paragraph. God what a twat.

    • w3dd1e@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 hours ago

      My company did the same thing. We called the president out on it too with the same result. After a year, they went back to remote work. You and your coworkers should keep bringing it up.

    • NotJohnSmith@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 hours ago

      Wow, that’s insanely unfair (25 miles), never heard of that. Either there is value that everyone is in, or not.

      Im waiting on my Co to pull this trigger too, jokes on them I’ll just pop in for breakfast and then leave again

      • Spaz@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 hours ago

        Yeah i wanted to do that too but to drive the 21 miles to work, one way, is 35-45 minutes with “normal” traffic and leaving at slow traffic times. So literally wasting 1 to 1.5 hours driving for chilling in office for a few minutes seems ridiculous. So if i drove in i would stay at least 2-3 hours.

  • shalafi@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    13 hours ago

    My wife does two days in the office and that sounds ideal to me. Really strange that lemmy generally sees zero benefits to the office.

    For example, I went in to met a coworker and fix her laptop. While I was there the devs in front of me were discussing a thing that my team was working on. I didn’t know they needed that thing and they didn’t know we were working on it. I took new information back to my group.

    While bullshitting with the tech support manager I learned some things about their policies and procedures. Found out I had made incorrect assumptions and learning about those helped me in my role.

    We’re social animals y’all.

    • csh83669@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 hours ago

      I 100% agree with you (even though it will get the both of us downvoted into oblivion). The important part is that it only works if everyone is in the office at basically the same time.otherwise you’re just the lone guy sitting in there for no benefit.

      I will 100% choose a company or team that is in the office over one that isn’t. Half remote is THE WORST. Trying to have an in person meeting, and then the remote people whining they aren’t included in decisions, or they don’t know the details. Every meeting is a half robotic nightmare as everyone in the room fumes that you have to spend 20 minutes getting all the remote people on the screen and dealing with mic issues when this could have be a 5 minute hallway chat.

    • scytale@piefed.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      12 hours ago

      It’s not about having zero benefits in the office, it’s about giving people the choice to do what works for them. Some people like working in the office, then go ahead. Some people prefer to work at home, let them. The problem is companies forcing everyone to do one thing when everyone works differently.

      I’m fully remote but I voluntarily go to the office once a week (as much as possible) primarily to socialize with coworkers and maybe do some in-person meetings if the timing is right. I would hate it if I was mandated to go once a week, because I prefer the flexibility.

    • prettybunnys@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      12 hours ago

      It depends on the industry, sure.

      I work in software development and unless we’re working with hardware I work better at home and don’t get much out of sitting next to someone.

      If I’m working on something that’s hands on then sure.

      If I need people to be in an office to have them engaged then my team blows already

    • meco03211@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      12 hours ago

      What you just described was a horribly inefficient use of resources. You gained insight through idle banter. While everyone is in office that’s what middle managers would tend to handle. All this time they thought they were herding cats, turns out the cats just wanted to be home. Now people don’t know who to go to because the “yes” person isn’t in a cubicle you can just waltz over to. Middle management needs a massive paradigm shift if they want to stay relevant in a WFH situation. And that seems increasingly likely to be the direction businesses will go once they cut staff with these asinine RTO policies.

      • csh83669@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 hours ago

        I like to think that genuine connection and collaborations aren’t… resources. I’m not some chit to be moved from one column to the next. The stuff you are talking about is part of being a human being. Could I maybe technically crap out 10% more lines of code if I’m a hermit working in a dank closet in my tiny apartment? Maybe. Is the newbie next time who doesn’t know what to do going to have any chance to grow and learn just from being part of things that happen organically? No.

  • Taleya@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    14 hours ago

    Companies keep doing this to shed workers and don’t seem to realise the “rockstar” workers you want to keep are the ones who walk because they have options

    All you’re doing is retaining the trapped and shit skilled

        • frank@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          6 hours ago

          Oh I’m sure there’s some super talented people there. They’re just not working very hard to get their stuff done because it’s easy.

          Now we’re testing if they’re willing to do the same but also sit in an office probably an hour away, for fun.

          It’s just a layoff workout laying people off, except you keep your worst workers for sure

          • boonhet@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            4 hours ago

            The guy who caught the xz backdoor was a Microsoft engineer who noticed SSH logins taking half a second longer and just had to find out what was going on.

            They’ve got proper engineers, they’re just assigned shit projects and tasks. I reckon they’re now being told to shoehorn AI in whereever possible.

      • RiverRabbits@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 hours ago

        I doubt microsoft has any talent left. If anything, whatever talent they may have, it cannot and will not be able to change things for the better. Their products are absolutely shit.

        • FinishingDutch@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          7 hours ago

          Microsoft is going the way of Boeing; trade in the actual people who know how to build a good product (the engineers/seasoned developers) and replace them with management fuckwits.

          Case in point the recent updated to Windows 11, which outright bricked a whole bunch of PC’s - again.

          And just look how they’re handling the forced move to Windows 11. Well, fuck’em. I’m going to Linux. Windows is dead.

    • radix@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      13 hours ago

      It’s an epidemic of “how do we cut staff by 15-20% without paying millions in severance” with no regard to what it means for the company beyond the next four fiscal quarters.

  • otp@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    14 hours ago

    Microsoft says AI is more productive than workers. Microsoft says workers are more productive in the office.

    AI is not in the office.

    So do we bring AI into the office to make it more productive?

    • hovercat@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      12 hours ago

      Unironically, this was exactly how the announcement at my old company went. Literally, someone getting paid millions of dollars a year basically saying “Yeah we made this decision on vibes alone”

      • jubilationtcornpone@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 hours ago

        “Vibe Executing” is apparently how alot of CEO’s do their jobs. They didn’t know how to gauge productivity before the pandemic and they still don’t. They just pull whatever sounds good out of their asses at any given moment.

      • Soup@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 hours ago

        My DM’s work did this. Not enough desks, no good plan, and a demand that every needs to be in the office on the Friday before a long weekend(or Thursday, if it’s the Friday that’s the holiday).

        • NotJohnSmith@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          7 hours ago

          I’m hearing more of the “3 days a week but Mon and Fri don’t count”. You can’t make this shit up

      • fulg@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        12 hours ago

        Same here, this exact conversation happened.

        In every meeting where feedback is requested since then, there is a permanent note that says “please no questions about RTO”.

  • vane@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    15 hours ago

    What I just read ? They return to office because thanks to AI they can move faster ?

    I want the same drugs.

  • TheFunkyMonk@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    16 hours ago

    We’ve looked at how our teams work best, and the data is clear: when people work together in person more often, they thrive — they are more energized, empowered, and they deliver stronger results.

    Would be interested in seeing that data.

  • corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    16 hours ago

    Oh look! Another navel-gazer unable to feel validated without seeing people’s asses in chairs. That’s gonna be awesome for the introverted type who take the most pride in really great code.

    And this unhealthy preoccupation with asses is a bit of a red flag.

  • floofloof@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    16 hours ago

    So Microsoft’s is casting about for something new because AI is not worth the money they spent on it, and management are all out of ideas? Better get the grunts back in their cubicles. Perhaps that will magically fix it.

    • corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      16 hours ago

      As per the Dead Sea Effect, they’re looking to shed people without actually making the redundant.

      As per the Dead Sea Effect, they’re not going to shed the dead weight.

  • kescusay@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    17 hours ago

    My office just did the same thing. And the backlash is enormous. No one wants it. No one likes it.

    • csh83669@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 hours ago

      Just silently grumping about it isn’t backlash. Backlash is a whole team just walking off, or a picket line around campus. Backlash is their precious stock price tanking because the whole on-call team called their bluff and the service is offline. They know no one will do that in this fascist hellscape of an economy, so they don’t care.

      Though I’m not sure it’s ’everyone’. I personally, vastly prefer in person work to remote, but I understand my views aren’t universal, or even common.

    • criss_cross@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      13 hours ago

      My favorite was when I was at Amazon watching leadership do the mental gymnastics to justify the move. At some point they just said it’s happening and we’re not listening to you.

    • mesa@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      15 hours ago

      Mine did it for about 1 month. Management was patting themselves on the back. Then they literally went on vacation…and we all just did hybrid/remote like we did before.

      The individual who was pushing for remote work got their optics and now we are all back to what we were before. Win/win!

      • kescusay@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        11 hours ago

        In our case, there are enough upper management folks who are opposed to it that I doubt it will last or ever be enforced. For people like me, it really doesn’t make any sense to enforce it in the first place, because all of my teammates are in other states and countries.

        Making me go to the office just means you can’t schedule early meetings with me, because I’ll be commuting during that time.

    • egrets@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      14 hours ago

      Literally never heard of it. Are you talking about Microsoft 365 Copilot, formerly known as Microsoft 365, formerly known as Office 365?