• tempest@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      CloudFlare has become an Internet protection racket and I’m not happy about it.

      • Laser@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        It’s been this from the very beginning. But they don’t fit the definition of a protection racket as they’re not the ones attacking you if you don’t pay up. So they’re more like a security company that has no competitors due to the needed investment to operate.

        • A1kmm@lemmy.amxl.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 month ago

          Cloudflare are notorious for shielding cybercrime sites. You can’t even complain about abuse of Cloudflare about them, they’ll just forward on your abuse complaint to the likely dodgy host of the cybercrime site. They don’t even have a channel to complain to them about network abuse of their DNS services.

          So they certainly are an enabler of the cybercriminals they purport to protect people from.

          • MithranArkanere@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 month ago

            Any internet service provider needs to be completely neutral. Not only in their actions, but also in their liability.
            Same goes for other services like payment processors.
            If companies that provide content-agnostic services are allowed to policy the content, that opens the door to really nasty stuff.

            You can’t chop everyone’s arms to stop a few people from stealing.

            If they think their services are being used in a reprehensible manner, what they need to do is alert the authorities, not act like vigilantes.

  • kescusay@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    I set up a WAF for my company’s publicly facing developer portal to block out bot traffic from assholes like these guys. It reduced bot traffic to the site by something like - I kid you not - 99.999%.

    Fucking data vultures.

  • ubergeek@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    Good. I went through my CF panel, and blocked some of those “AI Assistants” that by default were open, including Perplexity’s.

  • Electricd@lemmybefree.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    They do have a point though. It would be great to let per-prompt searches go through, but not mass scrapping

    I believe a lot of websites don’t want both though

  • kreskin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    they cant get their ai to check a box that says “I am not a robot”? I’d think thatd be a first year comp sci student level task. And robots.txt files were basically always voluntary compliance anyway.

    • Dr. Moose@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      Cloudflare actually fully fingerprints your browser and even sells that data. Thats your IP, TLS, operating system, full browser environment, installed extensions, GPU capabilities etc. It’s all tracked before the box even shows up, in fact the box is there to give the runtime more time to fingerprint you.

      • tempest@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        Yeah and the worst part is it doesn’t fucking work for the one thing it’s supposed to do.

        The only thing it does is stop the stupidest low effort scrapers and forces the good ones to use a browser.

      • kreskin@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        you’re not wrong, but it also allows more than 99.8% of the bot traffic through too on text challenges. Its like the TSA of website security. Its mostly there to keep the user busy while cloudflare places itself in a man in the middle of your encrypted connection to a third party. The only difference between cloudflare and a malicious attacker is cloudflares stated intention not to be evil. With that and 3 dollars I can buy myself a single hard shell taco from tacobell.

    • boonhet@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      As far as security is concerned, their w’s are pretty common tbh. It’s just the whole centralization issue.

  • tarknassus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    I don’t see a problem here. Maybe Perplexity should consider the reasons WHY Cloudflare have a firewall…?

    • sunbeam60@lemmy.mlBanned
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      They’re not. They’re using this as an excuse to become paid gatekeepers of the internet as we know it. All that’s happening is that Cloudflare is using this to menuever into position where they can say “nice traffic you’ve got there - would be a shame if something happened to it”.

      AI companies are crap.

      What Cloudflare is doing here is also crap.

      And we’re cheering it on.