My partner guesses his sternocleidomastoid muscle must have gotten severed because his head snapped back like that. This is what keeps your head down and causes TMJ.

Be wary of fedposting, my dears. Instead, make an offering to the Dark Lord to hasten his journey to the ninth circle of hell.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-GB/firefox/addon/love-not-robots/

I pass out so hard after Vyvanse. I’ve literally taken it to sleep before. Not the best sleep but its sleep!

Palantir has been here for years and the police, healthcare and MOD already use them.

Someone finally talking sense.

I use debian for my ancient media server. It’s great.

Proton works just as well as native, so even if the saves are not compatible with the native version, you’ll be able to copy the files into the proton structure.

They absolutely should, if not, you can probably run it in a VM shame box. I have a little windows set up on mine for some specialist apps. When games are installed via Proton on Linux, they usually are set up to mimic the file structure for windows.

😘

It doesn’t work like that (yet), but it is the easiest way to keep an offline copy. They have more info about this here: https://kiwix.org/en/frequently-asked-questions/

There is an app called Kiwix if you use Linux (I think it’s a flatpak) or WSL for Windows! :) It lets you download different languages and sizes. I just learned you can use graphical apps for WSL now, wew.

I have it linked in the subs I mod there. I welcome Reddit relieving me of duty, those subs are being neglected ngl lmao. :)

Even better. :)

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Potoo

It’s a double entendre.

I have a feeling that this is a retaliation for those as Epic is leading a charge against Google Play, and rightly so, not that they are an ally. I just like watching pigs fight.

https://techbriefly.com/2025/08/01/epic-games-store-coming-to-google-play-after-court-win/

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Epic_Games_v._Google

Hun you didn’t reply to my comment, reguardless, I expanded on my comment explaining how publishing works and why you may want to be more skeptical of this, even if you continue to be needlessly aggressive. I am trying to help you be smarter about this stuff. Single sites do not prove a theory, the earth is a system of systems. There is a lot of information about why this theory isn’t well supported out there reguardless about how you feel about it. In fact, according to the comments, it looks like a lot of their citations also do not actually support their claims (see PubPeer). I will not regurgiate a google search to talk to a brick wall. You cannot look at a single paper. Every paper must be looked at in the context of other research, this is why scientists rely on an impact factor as a smell test. Science is about consensus and disproving hypotheses and that is what I am trying to show you.

A paper supposedly proving a controversial theory, I’d expect to be published in a reputable specialist journal for the topic, maybe even Nature but this, well, isn’t. And trust me, it is not for lack of want. If you could prove something like that, you’d be running to the major journals for it as it would skyrocket your career and would be accepted with solid supporting information. This is what happened with the Clovis stuff, for example, once it became well supported it got published in major and specialist journals. EVERYONE wants to find something like that, this is part of the reason academia can be so toxic, especially with our pet theories. The repitable journals WOULD accept it if it was well sourced as it means there is a lot more funding and work for us all to do to review everything we know. You have to remember though, earth science methods and evidence are extremely different and require different considerations than archaeology. Rather than a lack of evidence for the Younger Dryas stuff, we have contradictory evidence and plenty of it. You can take this wisdom forward with you, or not, that is for you to choose. All that I can give you is information about how this stuff works. Again, ask me specifics if you want, (notably about megafauna extinction/culture/plants esp.), but I’ll save writing papers for my office hours.

And just to be clear - the burden of proof lies with those proposing extraordinary claims, not with the scientific community to disprove every fringe hypothesis. The consensus explanation (North Atlantic Conveyor shutdown) is well-established and supported by decades of research. If you want to overturn that, you need extraordinary evidence published in top-tier journals, not demands for others to write custom rebuttals to a PLoS ONE paper. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Atlantic_meridional_overturning_circulation

The hypothesis is widely rejected by relevant experts.[2][1][3][4] It is influenced by creationism, and has been compared to cold fusion by its critics due to the lack of reproducibility of results.[5] It is an alternative to the long-standing and widely accepted explanation that the Younger Dryas was caused by a significant reduction in, or shutdown of the North Atlantic Conveyor due to a sudden influx of freshwater from Lake Agassiz and deglaciation in North America.[6][7][8]

I’m just a holocene researcher in a geoscience dept lmao, but don’t take my word for it though, the wikipedia has plenty of links to explain why this is a bunk theory in far more detail including links to more credible journals on the subject. In fact, most of the article is about why it is so controversial. This is literally the time period I look at.

If you want a reccomendation, this is a better resource: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0012825223001915?via=ihub

According to the Journal Citation Reports, the PlosONE journal has a 2024 impact factor of 2.6. The journal I linked above sits at about a 20. https://www.sciencedirect.com/journal/earth-science-reviews This is extremely good for a specialized journal, especially in earth science. You tend to only see higher in Medicine and in journals like Nature or Science. For reference, Nature, the most cited journal, sits at about 50-60 iirc. PlosONE is not specialized and its’ score of 2-3 barely scratches “The Conversation,” and in the case of this paper in particular will likely include refutes lol.

If you have specific questions, I’d be happy to answer them, or grab someone around me that knows better, but I’d start at the wiki first.

No, no there was a lot of clickbait about this event in the media he’s referring to:

It was also found in the Pacific Northwest of North America in late 2019,[6][7] with a few more additional sightings in 2020,[8][9] and nests found in 2021,[10][11] prompting concern that it could become an invasive species,[12][Ala 1] but in December 2024, the species was announced to have been eradicated completely from the United States.[13]