

Absolutely. Finally a reply with some sense. This would work well, or at least better.
The “copyright doesn’t protect anyone so let’s remove it” people are just playing into the hands of big corporations.
Absolutely. Finally a reply with some sense. This would work well, or at least better.
The “copyright doesn’t protect anyone so let’s remove it” people are just playing into the hands of big corporations.
So you believe there is no protection for creators at all and removing copyright will help them?
But I’ll happily take all their free stuff, lol.
I’ve not spent over $20 on epic ever, but have hundreds of games.
And how do you think that’s going to go when suddenly the creator needs to compete with massive corps?
The reason copyright exists is for the same reason patents do: to protect the little guy.
Just because corporations abuse it doesn’t mean we throw it out.
It shouldn’t be long, but it sure should be longer than 5 years.
Or maybe 5 years unless it’s an individual.
I agree that copyright is far too long, but at 5 years there’s hardly incentive to produce. You could write a novel and have it only starting to get popular after 5 years.
Had an old one that kinda works but is a pain. More recently, we splurged on a more modern pet version with Wi-Fi and all the bells.
It was fantastic. And 3 weeks in, couldn’t stay connected to the network even right beside the router and was doing constant very short runs before returning to the dock saying it was full.
Returned it.
Yes, my point is not removing it or reducing it to 5 years.
I’m not saying copyright is doing its job particularly well right now, but reducing its protection is not helping creators.
Copyright IS about protecting creators; we’re just still letting corporations run the show.