Nothing says “cheap” more than clothes which are pretending to be expensive. If you’re going to dress up, wear your better clothes that are in your normal style.
Personally I wouldn’t bother. Just wear what you normally wear. Not everyone is interested in clothes even if they have money.
I don’t view free-use models as open-source. Open-source means I can rebuild it from scratch and I can’t because I don’t know what the training data is, or have access to it.
The scale is the difference and who is harmed.
Billion dollar company losing $100. Who cares?!
Billion dollar company stealing from all artists in the world. We care.
Points 2 and 3. Basically make restrictions on normal user accounts which are fine for humans but that will make bots swear and curse.
Unless you mean “what should the registration process be” I think API keys via a user account would do.
Exactly the reason I suggest it.
Is that an armadillo? Forgetting how my own code works is my forte.
Shrinkflation is smaller quantities
Yes
and/or higher prices.
No. That’s just normal inflation.
An LLMs “intent” is always to give you a plausible response even if it doesn’t have the “knowledge”. The same behaviour in a human would be classed as lying IMHO.
Make bot accounts a separate type of account so legitimate bots don’t appear as users. These can’t vote, are filtered out of post counts and users can be presented with more filtering option for them. Bot accounts are clearly marked.
Heavily rate limit any API that enables posting to a normal user account.
Make having a bot on a human user account bannable offence and enforce it strongly.
Agreed, It wouldn’t be a good thing. However it’s their own failures and mismanagement that are causing it.
It’s certainly arguable that the algorithm constitutes an editorial process and so that opens them up to libel laws and to liability.
Fair point.
Stupid sharks loose their teeth, not their fins that actually do the work.
Errr…wat!!!
The shark dies either way.
Under what law?
UK currently holds the people that post things liable for their own words. X, the platform, just relays what is said. Same as Lemmy. Same as Mastodon.
If you ban X I don’t see why those other platforms wouldn’t be next.
Now should people/organisations/companies leave X? Absolutely! Evacuate like it’s a house of fire. Should it be shut down by legal means? No.
Screen 0 deleted because of no matching config section.
Your XOrg conf ig has got hard definitions of your devices which aren’t matching what is being detected. Probably best to let auto detection do it’s thing.
Arch people tell you “I use arch BTW”
Rust people make PRs rewriting your code in rust.
Rust people are worse.
Memory ownership isn’t the only source of vulnerabilities. It’s a big issue, sure, but don’t think rust code is invulnerable.
That’s disengenuous though.
We’re not forcing you to learn rust. We’ll just place code in your security critical project in a language you don’t know.
Rust is a second class citizen, but we feel rust is the superior language and all code should eventually benefit from it’s memory safety.
We’re not suggesting that code needs to be rewritten in rust, but the Linux kernel development must internalise the need for memory safe languages.
No other language community does what the rust community does. Haskellers don’t go to the Emacs project and say “We’d like to write Emacs modules, but we think Haskell is a much nicer and safer functional language than Lisp, so how about we add the capability of using Haskell and Lisp?”. Pythonistas didn’t add Python support to Rails along side Ruby.
Rusties seem to want to convert everyone by Trojan horsing their way into communities. It’s extremely damaging, both to those communities and to rust itself.
Even if you decide to compromise, it’s worth doing so knowing that you are. It also looks good to the employer if you’re taking a real interest in the position and sizing it up.
Everything here, but I’d like to build a little on this.
Remember that you are also interviewing the company. You need to make a decision about whether this is a place you want to work. Will it give you the opportunity to learn when you need to learn? Are they a team that treat each other well? Do they have good dynamics? Can you see yourself benefiting from working here beyond just taking a pay check?
Computer programming, regardless of language, is hard. The computer does exactly what you tell it to.