• 0 Posts
  • 98 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: June 28th, 2023

help-circle



  • Fair. But that’s not really earth scale thinking in my book. It’s more our best understanding based on what we know.

    I know of these theoretical work arounds. They’re more mathematical models that say if such a thing as negative mass exists, then we might be able to go faster than the speed of light. Issue is that the model does nothing to show that negative mass exists.

    That and everything we know shows that it does not exist. If it did I would be incredibly happy. It’s just wishful hoping at this point though. We don’t even have a model or theory that shows how negative mass could exist. We only have theories that show what could happen if it did exist.

    It’s like saying hm we know how F=m*a works. What could happen if we set m to a negative number? Yah in the math we can but that does not mean we can in reality.




  • A drop in the bucket isn’t event close to a good understanding of how big space is. A satellite in the ocean is grossly misleading when it comes to the scope of space.

    Maybe a single O2 molecule in the ocean might be closer but even then that’s not even close to the scope of space.

    Space is big. So big that the light cone of our “pollution” can’t physically interact with most of it even if we did our best to “pollute” as much as we can and some alien species did their best to find that “pollution”. Space is so big that physics dictate the impossibility of our “pollution” interacting with most of space.

    Fun fact this is why the chance of aliens visiting us here on earth is basically 0.

    You can’t use earth scale thinking, that’s how big space is.

    This all being said we should do our best to not pollute the earth. We should use earth scale thinking when it comes to earth.










  • Although I do see that that bot has a very slight right wing bias I like it. It prevents the normalization of the use of literal propaganda outlets as news sources.

    I have a suggestion that might be a good compromise.

    The bot only comments on posts that are from less factual news sources or are from extreme ends of the spectrum.

    On a post from the AP the bot would just not comment.

    On a post from Alex Jones or RT the bot would post a warning.

    That way there is less “spam”, but people are made aware when misinformation or propaganda is being pushed.

    Also with such a system smaller biasses are less relevant and therefore become less important.