They’re going back to the Germany of the 1930’s.

Edit: Except with Epstein files.

Picture of Trump?

This. Except his timing is off - he’s starting something with the smallest local government he knows he could beat, Venezuela. He’s sending the US Navy to “sink drug traffickers” - without proof of said crime - and warning that reprisals or protection of said ships will be an act of war. And of course, wartime presidents can have a third term. Except Congress declares war, not the president. And we have to let each and every one of those MFers know we’re watching them. Any state that wants to follow California and redraw to increase Democratic seats should do so, to reduce the possibility of war.

Chop the Styrofoam into little pieces. Place in glass bottle. When the time is right, add gasoline. Now you have napalm. Rag for wick./s <-- this means I’m just kidding and you should never, ever do this or throw it at fascists.

“First wave” of files Trump said didn’t exist. And the MAGA knights feel no disturbance in The Farce.

“President Donald Trump and Congress have invalidated the Clean Air Act waivers that were the basis for California’s actions,” said Adam Gustafson, acting assistant attorney general for the Justice Department’s environment and natural resources division. “CARB must respect the democratic process.”

Democratic process? Trump and the DOJ dictating the law? Right.

Are you trying to EMP-proof your phone, or block signals/tracking for a time?

I’m allowed to be angry about two things, so I’m good.

I upvoted, but only to raise awareness of this important issue. /s

Not sure why anyone’s downvoting this. If someone you’ve never met thinks that you have to put your life on the line, and therefore may possibly die, to further a cause - let them explain that cause. If they can’t convince you it’s more important than your life, then maybe it isn’t.

See: Vietnam, etc.

Edit: My bad, I was thinking, “What’s a good example of evil?” - Conscription should never be “necessary”. The only thing conscription does is protect the status quo. Keep the upvote - it was an honest mistake on my part.

Exposing your junk while on school grounds gets you on a sex offender registry, yes? So… what’s happening with that?

Supreme Court: “One of us! One of us!”

Or a banana, of course.

I’ve seen a lot of these dumbass headlines recently, with double- and triple- and quadruple-negatives instead of clear, concise terms. They’re all like, “Appeals court rules against judge who declined to block restriction imposed by lower court on disabling injunction on tariffs…”.

Hint to newsies: If I have to diagram your damned headline to see if it’s “Yes” or “No”, rewrite it.

Yeah, but they’re into that shit.

I would think that if an FBI director wanted a person dead, you’d be hearing about how he did it, rather than how he desired it.

Also, I once used seashells to write “69ME”, but nothing happened, to my disappointment.

I would think that if an FBI director wanted a person dead, you’d be hearing about how he did it, rather than how he desired it.

That will be the safest plane in the sky. Where else are foreign governments going to find an imbecile as easily manipulated as Trump? They must keep him safe.

On the other hand, I hope they installed a spy cam in the bathrooms. Trump on a changing table while his aides tend his diapers would be hilarious.

The article stated that there were three shooters, and only two gunshot wounds. I seem to recall from the early '70s that firing squads of five people or so always secretly loaded one weapon with blanks. That way the shooters could all convince themselves that they were the one who had the blank if their conscience bothered them. Maybe these guys did the same thing but with only three shooters…

Or:

“Here, put this in your mouth”

“Whyszit tafte so fummy?”

" It’s a rectal thermometer"