Thanks for the rational response.
Step 3: Person will say they’re female or identify as one.
Is identifying as the opposite sex really something that is commonplace now? Usually these discussions center around identifying as a ‘woman,’ which is why I was specifically referring to sex in my question.
What if patrons who would be upset over having a male in the female restroom don’t care what the male identifies as?
Correct.
It’s also why everyone needs a linkedin and to wear a suit. We have an environment where you’re not an attractive hire unless you can show you’ve ‘paid into the system.’
It’s fucked, and that’s by design. We need to start respecting people who are fighting back instead of shaming them.
Honestly, we’re having the same revolution for white-collar jobs that automation made for blue-collar ones.
Like with chess, we’re going to reach a point where AI isn’t just ‘as good as humans,’ but it will be many times superior to the point humans need to make their own competitions excluding AI in order for them to be fair.
I absolutely hated the design and feel bad for anyone who gets into an accident with this monstrosity.
I guess we can start adding ‘nazi sympathizer’ to the list of terms that have lost their meaning.
Remember, you only have people like yourself to blame.
Is it just me, or is musk just profiting off of selling people tech before it’s actually ready?
Like, we just don’t have the means right now to achieve what he advertises, so he lies about it and then ‘alters the deal’ after taking people’s money.
There’s a war going on.
A war of ideas.
If you can’t answer him that’s all you have to say.
Don’t do this rigamarole of “do your own research to justify why other people use their words.”
The word ‘nazi’ has 100% lost its meaning.
Might as well just be saying “I don’t like this person or group of people because they disagree with me.”
Oh, my bad. I didn’t realize English may not be your first language. Let me clarify.
How do you think what you suggested should be enforced?
The culture is not here, no.
Right now, most of us believe that those who have more deserve more and those who have less deserve less. We don’t see an issue with, say, someone getting most of their meals through Doordash while complaining they ‘need’ more money.
Until that changes, we can’t expect society to change. We don’t want it to change unless it directly benefits us. If we have to sacrifice anything so those who have less than us can have more, we immediately become conservatives in our rhetoric.
I gotta ignore you now. You’re going to keep throwing shit at the wall to see what sticks.
Goodbye.
Dang, now you have to argue in bad faith.
Can’t say I expected more.
Yikes.
This is what happens when you’re faced with rationality. Can’t say I’m surprised.
This is a hypothetical question.
I shouldn’t have to preface it with that, but here we are.
None of this ever was an issue in the past until Republicans started pushing bullshit natives that noone cared about before to keep people distracted with a shiny turd whole they rob the state blind
You know, some people will say none of this was an issue until people started wanting to use bathrooms different from their sex.
Silver-lining: This will disproportionately affect rich people and consumerists because they are the ones most likely to be flying.
Reminds me of that old-ass meme of guys on a couch cheering/not cheering for the TV.
Yeah, people say they don’t want AI driving cars while AI has better safety records than the average human.
People also fought back against having machinery to automate production.
You might want to look into the “Luddites.”
I hope you can admit you’re wrong when the time comes, but I genuinely expect you to just pretend you never stuck your neck out in the first place.