• Michael@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    6 hours ago

    The culture is already there. We have a great base called the constitution and its bill of rights — we largely already support concepts like democracy and human rights.

    Humans and our units tend to be weak and vulnerable, we are easily manipulated, and we are easily corruptible. Capital has an greater influence on individuals (and especially our leaders and institutions) than forward momentum and the act of working towards solutions — making life better on this planet for everyone. Capital should not be a factor operating at a level above our ability to govern and direct our societies.

    Humanity has to start to learn how thrive and also learn to live in balance with the planet. Consumerism is certainly out of control, but it’s reductive and unfair to single any single person, group, or entity. Humanity is largely kept in survival mode (and also in fear, hate, and division), scarcity is artificial with our current level of technology and organization, and the truth of our consumerism and its roots is veiled to us.

    Nobody besides the oppressed, truly knows the extent of modern slavery, of modern child slavery, and of third-world exploitation.

    In my eyes, the solution is direct democracy and socialism. Building up our communities, and making our society at large and especially our cities, self-sustainable.

    I personally think that an international human bill of rights would be a wonderful goal to have to kick off a golden age for humanity.

    • gradual@lemmings.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      6 hours ago

      The culture is not here, no.

      Right now, most of us believe that those who have more deserve more and those who have less deserve less. We don’t see an issue with, say, someone getting most of their meals through Doordash while complaining they ‘need’ more money.

      Until that changes, we can’t expect society to change. We don’t want it to change unless it directly benefits us. If we have to sacrifice anything so those who have less than us can have more, we immediately become conservatives in our rhetoric.