Yes because never ever an user had abused their OS.

Newsflash honey: it’s a fucking tool, it doesn’t have feelings. It’s your own choice to use it or not.

Man fuck these half baked parasocial analogies.

One thing doesn’t exclude the other.

20 years ago we also thought piracy was dying. Yet here we are.

Bro have you ever tried to get rid of a habit? It’s fucking hard.

You missed entirely OP’s point of sticking to things familiar and gradually adapting. Is faster to learn this way.

Sounds stupid and ridiculous as fuck.

But then again, Gen. Laura Richardson, SOUTHCOM commander, is a military officer,not a diplomat or humanitarian program lead at USAID.

Classic military man woman. For them, we are the enemy, the southern continent, the population occupying their backyard. Gringos culiaos.

These people should NEVER talk publicly about these things.

If I had to, I wouldn’t even know how to start eating that.

Can’t unsee

2/5 passenger didn’t listen to me talk about <insert topic I know nothing about>

Isn’t it a bad idea to lift with those shoes?

Oh the irony

I bet is very relevant to:

On the Internet, what is a dead giveaway that someone is actually a kid?

Bad assumption, a localized event doesn’t affect everyone in the world equally.

Support for the Chinese Communist Party.

Imagine thinking everyone in China is 15yo. It says a lot of you.

Might add lack of general understanding but it’s pretty much what you said

They simplify too much, think values/morals/rules are shared, obvious, and uniform

Filipino fishermen in South China Sea

Isn’t this like once a year. Not news.

Me: This new law is against fiction. Your example is for something that’s not fiction. Do you understand the difference?

This is what I mean by your logic. Do you understand the difference between fiction and reality?

I mean, you said that camera thing like it was some kind of mic drop lol

Because surveillance never has been an issue /s. Did you just read the last comment and ignore the rest? One is a real problem, the other is fiction. Do you understand the difference?

Personally I think the Justice system attempting to have a bit of foresight is a good thing

Sure man, let’s make a law about something we know nothing about, what could go wrong.

Nice article, but it’s more like reading stimulus reaction while reconstructing it in a form that’s similar to the original. But it has flaws. Based on the recordings you can make out pretty much any existant song (or memorized recording) but not original thoughts. Everyone can remember the beats of a song, but also everyone makes word associations in different ways, depending on which concepts sticks.

Very cool for an interface tho. It would be possible to use it as base for composers, if it’s possible to interpret original hummings, or beats (what would I know, I’m not a musician), which would require training.

But there is a catch

Continuing to probe musical perception is likely to be difficult because the brain areas that process it are hard to access without invasive methods.

nothing gets out on its own

You’re wasting taxpayers money in fiction and pseudoscience. Every law needs at least one real example of something being done in bad faith or at least proven possible (even if the perpetrator fails at it).

The cameras was just a real example of invasion of privacy. By your logic maybe we need to make laws against time traveling ASAP, considering at any moment time travelers will be more relevant than ever.

You need to start making laws for things that really affects your life right now, instead of fictional maybes.

Man from earth (2007)

A low-money production movie about a man telling his friends he has survived since the origins of humanity. Very though provoking.