SavedKriss

$ makepkg --syncdeps

$ makepkg --install

Btw

Ay, ay, ay

Wouldn’t it be easier to hardcode in the servers an entire encyclopedia instead of trying to limit a generative model to give only “right” answers?

TedX talk? More like:

Step right up, folks, and witness the magnificent medicinal miracle of Simpson and Son’s patented revitalizing tonic. [deep breath] Put some ardor in your larder with our energizing, moisturizing, tantalizing, romanticizing, surprising, her-prizing, revitalizing tonic.

1. It’s not an LLM, it’s a GAN and it’s inner workings are very different.

2. If that 1/6th has the most positive feedback in recognizability, for the GAN it becomes a high weighted part of the standard. These model’s categorizing flow favors unique features of images.

Does it help the model to produce images that are indoubtably “american” for it’s raters or for it’s automated rating system? If yes they are statistically significant. Low frequency and systematic rarity can be both significant in a statistical analysis.

Are you sure?

Maybe you are confusing “traditional” with “religious”.

Pick up a dictionary, or even better, an encyclopedia.

Probably they don’t because it’s not context appropriate, as we all do with our dresses. More so if you and them live in a state or city with a different dress code. These things strongly depend on context.

For generative models though, they produce usually the most stereotyped answers possible, with a pinch of randomness, so we shouldn’t be surprised about this phenomenon. They are rewarded by these things.

A traditional dress is not a religious dress, it’s a dress used for a long time for it’s usefulness or fashion.

The historical use of the turban is fascinating, spanning for millennia and in a lot of regions and ethnic groups of the world.

I suggest the wiki page for further info, more precise than I have on hand.

An excerpt about the Pagri:

In Rajasthan state of India these turbans, known as Pagri or Safa, is a traditional headwear that is an integral part of the state’s cultural identity.

My point was (but it might be lost in sarcasm) that being the “hat” of Indian kings, nobles and emperors for millennia, we have a lot of drawings and also photos of Indian people with turbans, that most probably these generative models have been trained on.

On a footnote: why should the concept of a traditional dress be offensive? A lot of human groups have one.

What a surprise! A traditional outfit appears statistically significant to a large statistical model and shows more frequently. What a novel finding. I’m flabbergasted! What will be next? CEOs in jacket and tie? Dogs with fur? Why my 512x512 picture of a Inuit in a snowfield doesn’t portrait the subject wearing a bikini? Why can’t meta read my mind? WHY, MARK? WHHHHY?

Conmen gotta con.

Because that’s privatization. Paying a private contractor has the benefit of reducing the immediate cost of services for the state, at the hidden expense of corners so cut that things become circular.

If you search on PubMed, the same BCI was being experimented on in 1991. 1991!

Too late now

Male urinary incontinence is a serious thing and might be caused by prostate cancer among other things. Instead of plugging your urethra with a finger you should talk to your doctor.