!linkedinlunatics@sh.itjust.works back at it again with some more AI bs.
Ist there actually an upcomming alternative for Job profiles and stuff?
Ha! “Consultant / Technology Manager” – pretty sure he’s just working on the next buzzword buffet to justify his bloated comp package.
Oh well, gives me an excuse to link this Weird Al song that makes far more sense.
Here is an alternative Piped link(s):
Piped is a privacy-respecting open-source alternative frontend to YouTube.
I’m open-source; check me out at GitHub.
they did the meth right
So math is like painting, you can just arbitrarily add a splash of color somewhere to change the mood…
Well math might be, physics for sure isn’t
I feel like you are forgetting QCD, where they actually added a splash of colour to change the mood of the reader.
AI+8k+5G
We need a = sign sonewhere, right?
Nope, none of this is math.
When the marketing guy tries to do a job meant for the engineering department.
Let me guess, some Indian boomer? They come up with the wildest shit.
WTF does Indian have to do with anything?
I am Indian myself, so I have a better understanding about the internet sub-culture intrinsic to my country. This is a neutral stereotype about ‘WhatsApp Unkils’. It is a counter-reaction to ageism towards younger people, whose intelligence is mocked, simply because they’re younger - the Asian culture of “elders are always right” snubs Gen-Y, Z and younger folks. Now that internet has blown up in India, old people who are literate and take pride in this sort of elitism are embarrassing themselves with their “confidently incorrect” takes on the internet.
Basically the same is happening to boomers, e. g. in Europe, too. Also ageism is happening here too. I don’t know, how much worse it is over on your part of the planet, but here you’re also not taken seriously when you’re young
So you feel this is perhaps racist but no concern for it also being perhaps ageist?
Ok sure. I’ll endeavor to be more perfectly critical of people if that pleases you.
Sounds like some
bullshit artistmotivational speakerProbably an AI expert too
And a Bitcoin Scholar
Bitcoiners are old-school, serious people. They highly dislike such bullshit as they have seen the entire “crypto” shitshow, and the AI bullshit is similar in many ways
I love that’s it’s not “what are you on about?” it’s just a general what
It goes on like this:
What
The
Actual
F***
Is
This?
I always found the difference between general and special whativity fascinating.
I want to know who this idiot is.
his name is Chatgpt
I choose to believe he’s just looking for VC money and is not actually that stupid lol
I mean, the equation isn’t wrong given that AI basically becomes a rounding error and can be safely ignored.
AI = 0 □
Obviously the statement is obsurd. If you wanted to get super pedantic, if we let AI =√P*C and rearrange to get rid of the square root then we arrive Einstein’s full equation. E2 = (MC2 )2 + PC2. Where P is equal to the momentum of the object. Then AI is just a symbol for the energy stored in momentum. So they’re technically correct, which as we all know is the most important type of correct.
(MC^2 + C√P)^2 wouldn’t give you that result though, because you have to FOIL.
Instead you’d get M^(2) C^4 + 2MC^(3)√P + PC^2
And that’s not even the correct formula. It’s
E^2 = (mc(2))2 + (pc)^2
You can’t just naively apply a square root unless one of the terms is vanishing (momentum for a stationary mass, giving E = mc^2, or rest mass for a massless particle, giving E = pc = hf).
The way to remember this is that it’s equivalent to the Pythagorean theorem, A^2 + B^2 = C^(2).
So it in fact only makes sense if AI = 0.
In my experience, when E=mc² is written, physicists generally mean relativistic mass, making the formula extract, whereas m_0 is used for rest mass, as seen in the expansion E = m_0c² + m_0v²/2 + O(v⁴)
Where does that expansion come from? As far as I can tell, m0v^(2)/2 only gives you the kinetic energy of the object where v << c, in which case the difference between relativistic mass and rest mass is negligible?
And where does the O(v^4) term come from?
This really seemed like a good simplification until you threw in that d’Alembert operator at the end
Reading this is an actual cognitive hazard.
Thanks for listening to my TedX talk, which I paid to present.
TedX talk? More like:
Step right up, folks, and witness the magnificent medicinal miracle of Simpson and Son’s patented revitalizing tonic. [deep breath] Put some ardor in your larder with our energizing, moisturizing, tantalizing, romanticizing, surprising, her-prizing, revitalizing tonic.
I paid to watch it! Hey, wait a second… Do you think Mr. XTalk could be just trying to take our money while building a disinformation platform of unchecked greed?
Honestly I had too many people insist that Tedx has any value
I’d like to present the equation solution to all sandwich related crisiseseses: BLT+AI.
Bacon, Lettuce, Tomato + Avocado, Ice cream?
Worse, iceberg lettuce. If the first one is also iceberg, pass.
Critical support for struggling academics trying to grift some brainless tech bro billionaire out of his money
Oops my bad I mess read who’s the phd and who’s the sentient clipart
LinkedIn is just another Microsoft-owned account you should just delete for your sanity
