• rumschlumpel@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    8 days ago

    Probably a major amount of important scientists. Many are known to have been eccentric or downright socially inept; while social ineptitude can be a bit of a hindrance for becoming famous, eccentricity helps a lot with making people remember you. Do most people know Einstein because of his science, or because he’s visually distinct and has that wild photo with his tongue out?

    • TheReanuKeeves@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 days ago

      I think I know Einstein because it was so common to call people Einstein either genuinely or sarcastically, I didn’t see the tongue out photo til probably a decade after

      • rumschlumpel@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        8 days ago

        I’d assume that he got that reputation because of that image. Once a person becomes a household name, the original thing that made them famous often becomes somewhat forgotten; it’s similar to how today’s memes work. As an example, I’ve been somewhat involved with pokemon online culture for over 10 years and knew about the nuzlocke challenge, but only today did I learn that it came from a webcomic. And I actually read a lot of webcomics, and the webcomic in question was pretty high quality.

    • makeshiftreaper@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 days ago

      Probably Newton and Tesla. Both seemed to not really understand other people and were more focused on their specific hobbies

    • wuphysics87@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 days ago

      The Einstein picture was on his bIrthday when he wad asked to smile. Not sure if that confirms or refutes your argument

  • chunes@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 days ago

    I think very few of them would have been famous, even posthumously, if they had lived today.

    • TheReanuKeeves@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 days ago

      In what sense? That their work wouldn’t be appreciated or they wouldn’t have reached that point of success due to society?

      • chunes@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 days ago

        There are way more people today and we compete with the entire world so it’s harder to stand out.

        And progress is a lot more complicated today. It requires bigger teams working with more complicated equipment and more data than ever before. That means more people involved and, again, less opportunity for any one person to stand out.

        This is all exacerbated by scientific journals and media companies that are more interested in making money than in making sure the best stuff rises to the top.

        And people aren’t on the same page like they used to be. When there are a billion books, movies, songs, etc. to choose from, pop culture becomes less and less of a thing. People end up in their own increasingly atomized camps and can spend whole lifetimes there, not really caring about stars from the other camps.

  • MomoGajo@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 days ago

    There is a legit theory in historical circles that Galileo Galilei was brcause he clearly didn’t understand some social conventions. Additionally, he was really ok with home arrest.

    • agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      8 days ago

      Oh no, sentenced to stay at my house where all my favorite stuff is, and a legally binding excuse to not have to go to that thing someone invited me to. You sure showed me, whatever shall I do?

  • Frezik@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    8 days ago

    Thomas Jefferson. Good at writing, shit at social conventions. Developed a whole mechanised house via slaves. Slavery might not be an autistic trait, but mechanizing your house is.

    I wouldn’t consider him a positive example, but he almost certainly was autistic.

  • ChonkyOwlbear@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 days ago

    Alfred Krupp, German steel manufacturer, inventor, and the largest arms dealer of his age.

    He was obsessed with building cannons and built the first successful breech loading cannon of cast steel. Common wisdom was that such cannons would explode and kill their operators. He kept building cannons even though nobody would buy them.

    He was an extreme hypocondriac who also suffered from depression. He would not leave his bed for weeks or months at a time. He would weigh anyone who visited his house and kept over thirty years of records before he died. He loved the smell of horse dung and had his office built over the stables so he could always smell it.