• LainTrain@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      Actually more like deliberately disassembled socialized healthcare to enrich corrupt peers of the government through contracts and eventually lower the standards so bad so the NHS can be saved through “privatisation”.

    • Match!!@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      Intentionally biased socialized medicine, too. Imagine if you had to wait 10 months for abortion prescriptions.

      • Gigan@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 months ago

        Great reasons the government shouldn’t be in charge of healthcare! Your options could change based on whatever party is in power

        • JackGreenEarth@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          6 months ago

          The conservative government is trying to underfund and undermine the NHS so that people do switch to private healthcare and they don’t have to pay for it any more. And then they claim it wasn’t their fault, as people chose to switch. You’re helping them.

        • BubbleMonkey@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          6 months ago

          As opposed to the US model of arbitrarily changing based on your employer, or whatever plans they choose to sponsor for you for a given year? Oh yeah, that’s in addition to whatever party’s in power tinkering with availability/access (look at mifepristone for an example)

          What’s your point? “Your system isn’t perfect, reeeee!!!” Ok, and? How does this add anything, anything at all, to the conversation?