• CheeseNoodle@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 days ago

    I have this smart lightbulb that I got for halloween last year because I thought it’d be cool to make the porch glow purple for trick or treaters. Now I have to replace it because the app that controls it has decided to try and blackmail me for camera and location access and the bulbs default state without the app is to flash on and off in a way seemingly deliberately designed to cause headaches.

    • Event_Horizon@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 days ago

      My sister bought me a smart desk light that insists on using an app and ‘doesn’t work’ without it.

      Thing is, it will work as a normal desk light…if you’re willing to sit through 10 minutes of intense blinking while it tries to connect before finally giving up.

  • moseschrute@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 days ago

    This is absolutely a problem, but credit where credit’s due, I’m really happy that the specification for Matter requires local control without calling out to the internet. Though Matter devices can still call out to the internet for additional features. I know Matter has it’s issues, but I believe it is slowly improving the smart home. But I fully understand people that want to reject the smart home altogether.

    • Derpgon@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 days ago

      My whole home automation is using Zigbee devices, they don’t even know what internet is, and it doesnt matter which brand it is as longs it is supported by Zigbee2MQTT. Matter is great, so is Thread.

      • moseschrute@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 days ago

        Yeah! Where I can, I use matter over thread. Correct me if I’m wrong, but I think that should provide the same benefits as zigbee? From what I remember, thread evolved from zigbee.

        Unfortunately matter over thread simple doesn’t exist for some categories of devices. For light bulbs, only Nanoleaf offers matter over thread, and the quality is pretty terrible. Do they even make matter over thread air conditioners?

  • MicrobiomeEnthusiast@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 days ago

    The internet has become more and more complex. I miss the early 2000s when I was a kid and everything was open and easy to use. No need to register ,no need to download this or that app. Everything was easy, even the laws.

  • Juliebones@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 days ago

    Omg yes preach !!! I feel it’s everything these days, coffee maker…app Vacuum…app Scale…app Electric shower nozzle…fucking app Everything needs a password and an account and my mind is crumbling because of it.

    • Patches@ttrpg.network
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 days ago

      You know you can dumb shit, right?

      It’s rarely a secret these days whether something has wifi, or Bluetooth.

      • Glitterbomb@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 days ago

        TVs seem to have been pretty much taken over by ‘smart’ features.

        I don’t mean this as a dare or a gotcha, but genuinely asking if you know of a decently priced modern TV that’s ‘dumb’ please let me know so I can buy it.

        • Auth@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 days ago

          Yeah when I brought a TV a few years ago I could not find a good one that wasnt ‘Smart’ except for commercial variants that were an extra couple of thousand.

  • lemmy_outta_here@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 days ago

    My poor tv is like, “connect to the internet? I need to call home! Help, i’ve been abducted by a luddite!”

    Tv, you are never getting my wifi password.

    • kieron115@startrek.website
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      Through absolute chance (the TV i wanted was sold out on clearance so I got a different one on clearance) I ended up with an Android TV-powered sony bravia. It lets you go into the app permissions and disable the optical recognition whateverthefuck they call it software. The rest of the analytics can be blocked by some regex firewall/DNS rules. It’s the only smart TV OS that I would recommend.

  • Rose56@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 days ago

    I totally agree! I’m trying to avoid logins and download this and that, as possible as I can.

  • MystikIncarnate@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 days ago

    I’m half on one side, half on the other.

    The line I draw is between safety and convenience. On the safety side, I want things to be very manual. I don’t want some app or external system managing whether or not the lights stay on, or whatever, on the convenience side, I 1000% want a way to manage things like the lighting from an app.

    So anywhere that safety is a concern, like the kitchen, bathroom, a handful of other places… There’s zero “smart” anything. Everywhere else, yeah, I can turn off my lights from an app.

    When I’m in my office/living room, where safety isn’t really a concern, I don’t have to get up to turn on the lights, I can yell at my Google home to do it for me, or use an app. If I want the lights to be some shade of turquoise, I use the app…

    In the kitchen, as an example, no such control exists. You have to push the light switch, and you get basic bitch white light. You don’t get an option. You want the light off? Take your fingers and do the thing that makes the light switch go click and turn off the lights.

    The decision to make anything smart relies on whether or not I’m going to be in danger if the lights go out and there’s no way to turn them on again because the Internet is down.

    • Glitterbomb@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 days ago

      I’ve seen some neat features included, but it’s never worth all the added bullshit they add in. Being able to tell if your oven is still on, or garage door is still open is great, but the app is never just that. It always comes with a truck load of bullshit noone asked for.

    • Pringles@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 days ago

      I want everything as dumb as possible. I will register whatever I buy with the manufacturer for warranty purposes, but other than that: dumb toaster, dumb fridge, dumb washing machine, dumb robot vacuum cleaner, dumb doorbell, dumb locks, etc…

      If it doesn’t need internet to function, it’s not getting any.

      • Patches@ttrpg.network
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        Last time I registered was for my dishwasher, all it did was get me on the mailing list to buy another dishwasher.

        How many fuckin dishwashers do you think I need, mate?

        I just stopped registering anything. I’m entitled to my warranty either way.

    • Olhonestjim@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 days ago

      I want quality buttons and knobs that let me control all necessary functions manually from the device. Smart features are for convenience and tracking stats. Never should the device talk to any party but me.

    • dejected_warp_core@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 days ago

      I agree completely. But now I can’t get the image out of my head, of the maniac that has done the complete opposite of this. Like putting the sink disposal unit, door locks, and flush toilets, all on a publicly accessible “smart” network.

  • ArmchairAce1944@discuss.online
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 days ago

    I remember when games asked you to register and it was optional… and people joked that they never did because there was no benefit to them whatsoever.

    Now it is obligatory. No wonder I prefer retrogaming.

  • roscoe@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 days ago

    I recently renovated and said fuck no to all the smart home shit. Just the idea of having to troubleshoot the WiFi because my kitchen light won’t turn on drives me into a rage.

    • LordCrom@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 days ago

      Good call.

      I took over for a previous manager who installed all smart lights controlled via Alexa. Every week…every fucking week…there would be a section not working, lights with disco colors, Alexa was offline so we could give the command to turn on lights…

      When I took over, 1st task was to rip out all the smart shit and I put in regular LED bulbs controlled with the light switch. Works every time

      • Patches@ttrpg.network
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        3 days ago

        The closest thing I have to “the world of tomorrow” are regular degular hand operated dimmer switches. They’re great. I have one in every room.

        No idea why everyone thinks you need the Internet to dim a light.

    • Kairos@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 days ago

      It is incredibly difficult for me to describe just how powerful a Linux desktop experience can be. You can buy a cheap computer that suports emulation and put QubesOS on it. Bonus points to putting a GPU in it and playing on either Windows or Linux with that GPU.

      • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
        cake
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 days ago

        I don’t think Linux people entirely understand just how uninviting the prospect of messing around with an operating system is for the vast majority of the public.

        As bad as Windows is, and it is it getting worse by the minute, it honestly does just work. I dual boot my computer, mostly into Linux everyday and even now I occasionally come across problems that don’t exist on the Windows side. The community need give up with this idea that Linux doesn’t have major usability issues.

        • lemmy_outta_here@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          3 days ago

          My experience is pretty limited and I might just be lucky in that everything worked for me, but installing linux was exactly as hard as installing windows. If anything, I found it less annoying because with Windows I tend to decline a lot of their services (no cloud, no office, etc) and I profoundly resent being nagged by MS to use services that don’t interest me.

          If I bought my laptop with linux preinstalled, I wouldn’t say that it has been less usable than a windows machine. there is some missing support, but I had similar issues with switching from mac to windows and back.

        • Olhonestjim@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          3 days ago

          I am not a power user, but I’m ok. I got sick of Windows BS, so when I got my Framework 13, I installed PopOS. I haven’t had to do anything to get things to work. It’s been fantastic.

        • dejected_warp_core@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          3 days ago

          I may be in the minority here, but I absolutely know how to rock every corner of a modern Linux setup and I avoid OS-tinkering at home like the plague. I have better things to spend my time on, so the bar for user-friendly computerized things in my home is incredibly high. In fact, to circle back to OP’s point, such things have to “just work”, be secure by default, and require minimal hacking and tinkering to function reliably.

        • Baŝto@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          3 days ago

          I don’t think Linux people entirely understand just how uninviting the prospect of messing around with an operating system is for the vast majority of the public.

          The point is that you can, not that you have to. My system is very customized. A few years ago when I had to work with Windows I used it with ConsoleZ (middle click paste!!!11), Kate (KDE4Win) & Dolphin (KDE4Win; explorer didn’t support tabs), that also wasn’t the most stable experience one could wish for. I would’ve used a tiling manager if such a thing would’ve existed, but there are some things you just can’t have on Windows. Everything works fine and stable when you use the standard stuff (for Windows that would be Explorer, MS Office, Outlook, Edge, Visual Studio, etc), but I’d expect the same from stuff like Ubuntu without third-party repos and no manually installed stuff. And even more if you just use GNOME/KDE with their standard software.

            • PrincessTardigrade@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              3 days ago

              Not to mention all the dependencies for everything, I’ve gone multiple layers deep trying to install dependencies for the dependencies just to use a single module. Tbf I’ve mostly used Linux for bioinformatics so perhaps the problem for me is biologists creating software for other biologists and none are truly computer scientists (including myself)

              • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
                cake
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                3 days ago

                It very much depends on the build of Linux you’re getting but there’s definitely quite a lot of builds out there that were designed for enthusiasts, where after you’ve installed it you have to spend the next several hours configuring everything. Your average computer user has very limited patience for this assuming they’re prepared to even do it at all.

                I bet that 99% of people don’t even really know how you would go about installing a new operating system. It’s not exactly intuitive.

        • Redredme@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          3 days ago

          Yeah it’s funny. Post about stuff just working out of the box.

          First reply: Open source. Downgrade. So… Do exactly what the post is raging about.

          • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
            cake
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            3 days ago

            There are many advantages to open source software and a lot of it does actually just work. Linux isn’t one of them though.

            To be fair that’s because an operating system is far more complicated than most open source projects which tend to be applications.

  • 𒉀TheGuyTM3𒉁@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 days ago

    Simplicity is the ultimate sophistication (a bit ironic when you consider this quote comes from Apple).

    Steam is fun and all, minecraft is a great game, but goddamn, i have a 10kbps at home, and network is unstable where i live, why can’t i play my fcking game “licence” which is not even online based, because the network decided to stop??

    I prefer from far a simple folder with assets and a .exe that i will put on my desktop with a shortcut.

    What an application is supposed to be anyways.

    • 5too@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 days ago

      Steam works fine for me offline, though I can’t speak to all the games - what are you running into with it?

      I hear you on Minecraft, though…

    • Baŝto@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 days ago

      Steam has a “Go Offline…” options for pretty much that. Indeed it sucks that you have to do that before you go offline, but it sounds like a good idea with your setup and just switch to online occasionally to update.

      Furthermore it depends heavily on the games, not on steam. Some steam games work without the steam client, though for some of those you have to fiddle around or execute different binary.

    • calcopiritus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 days ago

      Simplicity is easy to pirate though.

      If the product is a program that executes 100% of its functionality on your computer, it is impossible to make it pirate-proof. Even if all the functionality is client-side and the server is used only for authentication, it can be pirated.

      The only way to make a program pirate-proof is if it runs on the server with a thin client.

      That being said, some products execute on the client. Therefore if they want to prevent piracy, the only thing they can do is security through obscurity. That is, make it as complex as possible so the pirates take as much time as possible to reverse-engineer it.

    • Waraugh@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 days ago

      I don’t think it’s ironic, it just doesn’t say the quiet part out loud. Everything just works if they control the entire ecosystem, so if you want ‘sophisticated’ let us control everything and it will all just work.

      • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
        cake
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 days ago

        You don’t need a network connection for Minecraft single player. I’m not actually sure what they’re on about.