• cRazi_man@europe.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    18 days ago

    I’m really happy that this is not relevant to me.

    … because I don’t use Windows. I wish it was also because I managed to get rid of WhatsApp from my life.

  • NewNewAugustEast@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    18 days ago

    It amazes me people use this crap. I guess people just don’t give a fuck about their life.

    Yes I know it is extraordinarily popular in many places of the world. Mine included. The hardest part isnt friends, it is businesses.

    Friends/family have been easy enough: we are going to use signal for example. They go ok, whatever. But business got complacent. We always work it out in the end anyways. Or I wont give them my business.

  • Capricorn_Geriatric@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    17 days ago

    Why would anyone care about it being uglier?

    It’s WhatsApp. Ugly is their visual identity.

    If they changed their app to resemble a neon citylight barely anyone would even notice, let alone complain.

  • Balder@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    18 days ago

    I’m just thinking now that the Mac is next.

    I thought that as much as these companies preach about LLMs doing their coding, the cost of development would go down, no? So why does it need to reduce everything to a single code base to make it easier for developers?

  • HubertManne@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    18 days ago

    The whole point of webapps was not to have os specific ones. somehow smartphones caused everything to move backwards.

  • Muhammad@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    18 days ago

    Does anyone have any idea why, I thought it was also quite liked by the community, no need to open up the extreamly slow web browser just to post one image or pdf

    • imecth@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      18 days ago

      It’s in the article. Maintaining two versions is very expensive. It’s basically why every single application is moving towards web versions.

  • Prove_your_argument@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    18 days ago

    I’ve literally only ever used the web version on windows. It works fine, so what’s the problem? what functionality is being lost?

    More ram usage? oh no! I couldn’t possibly have free Ram left!

  • OmegaSunkey@ani.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    18 days ago

    What’s so funny is that they were going to allow encrypted (they say) calls on the web app but then suddenly released a native windows client and told everyone if you wanted calls you need to use it, then removed all buttons for calls or video calls.

    I guess they’re coming back on that.

  • LumpyPancakes@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    18 days ago

    I never installed their app on Windows. I figured it could just randomly watch what I was doing, log keystrokes, view websites and history etc. I don’t know if I’m misunderstanding how much Windows apps can spy on each other - they don’t seem to ask for permissions etc.

  • RoadTrain@lemdro.id
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    18 days ago

    It’s a shame. The app worked well, and it was nice to have a native look rather than a generic web one.

  • Shape4985@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    18 days ago

    I dont mind the web app as i dont have to install anything and i can sandbox it to my browser.

    Edit: using ublock in whatsapp ;)