• Nalivai@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 hours ago

    I want to remind you once again, that you are defending actual child abusers. Not just people who have some fucked up desires and not act on them, but actual childfuckers. You are saying that people who already fucked kids should be shielded from law by religion because some other people also want to fuck kids but don’t do that.

    • Kage520@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 hours ago

      You’re missing the point. I’m not defending them. Their actions are abhorrent andtheir victims deserve justice. I’m suggesting if we act aggressively towards these self reporters, you will actually INCREASE the number of molested children by disuading future self reporting from others.

      I’m trying to decrease the number of victims. I don’t know how to give the victims justice, but decreasing future victims is paramount.

      • Nalivai@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 hours ago

        And you’re missing the point of what we’re talking about. Right now, the law allows active child molesters to execute well known religious loophole, where they “confess” their crimes to an unaccounted guy from religious organisation, and this act makes the crime nonexistent according to their proposed worldview. What it actually does, is that it clears the guilt from the perpetrator, allowing him to continue his acts. Knowing history of Catholic church, if it does anything is that it allows child molesters to exchange experiences and tips for future crimes.
        Removing all oversight from this process increases the amount of crime going on, and that’s what you’re advocating for.
        The point of letting people who didn’t act on their urges to get psychological help they need to continue not act on it, is obviously correct opinion you have. It’s just it doesn’t apply here.