TLDR: Drug dealers in Catalonia have started to adopt GrapheneOS en masse leading to Catalan police suspecting anyone with a Google Pixel is a drug dealer

  • Flockwit@lemmy.nz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    Reminds me of when the US tried to fight “terror” by kidnapping people and shoving them in Gitmo because they were wearing Casio watches, which is apparently a brand favoured by terrorists.

    • SonOfAntenora@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      There was a guide to craft a timed bomb with the f-91w and other common materials. Uploaded by the terrorists. It worked

  • arc99@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    The cops quite obviously don’t think owning a Pixel makes somebody a drug dealer. But if they arrest or detain a suspect then owning a Pixel flashed with GrapheneOS isnt exactly a sign of innocence. Even if nothing could be extracted from the phone, I’m sure a judge and jury could be convinced what they were doing if they have such a device in their possession.

    Also, regardless of the security the OS claims to have, most criminals are not the brightest and I bet some can be squeezed to hand over the key or the phone can be unlocked with a face id or fingerprint. It also motivates the cops to do what they’ve done in the past where they have compromised supposedly secure operating systems or apps and installed backdoors.

      • arc99@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        This is not hard to understand.

        Having a phone installed with an OS favoured by criminals doesn’t exculpate a person arrested for criminal activity, or make the cops think they’re innocent.

    • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      OK. Owing an iPhone or Samsung also isn’t a sign of innocence, it’s just a phone, just like a Pixel. There may be a higher incidence of people owning Pixels being drug dealers/traffickers, but there’s also likely a lot of people who have them who aren’t drug dealers/traffickers, so that fact isn’t useful as evidence.

      • arc99@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        You’re getting it the wrong way around. People aren’t arrested for the phone they have. This is a complete nonsense by a clickbait article. They are arrested based on observation or intelligence of criminal activity. After the fact, when they are arrested they are found to have one of these phones flashed to use a privacy OS. Do you think such a phone convinces the cops they got the wrong person or not? The answer quite obviously is it convinces the cops this person is a criminal and is attempting to hide what they are up to.

        It would be absurd to think cops are staring at people’s phones to initiate arrests because they are not.

        • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 month ago

          Whether it convinces the cops isn’t nearly as important as whether it convinces a judge/jury. I highly doubt “suspect’s phone is too hard to break into” would sway a jury to believe they’re a drug dealer.

          Cops need to do a proper investigation and prove guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. The type of phone someone has shouldn’t significantly impact any of that, though having a phone they can break into may make that investigation easier.

  • besselj@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    They’re mad they can’t use cellbrite to snoop on properly configured GOS phones and that they actually have to do real police work to catch drug dealers

    • boonhet@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      Yes. They (cellebrite) don’t mention GrapheneOS support very loudly because it’s poor. They can’t decrypt one that’s BFU (Before First Unlock), not even by brute force if it’s a 6 digit passcode apparently. Don’t know if they can get data from an AFU GOS pixel. A year ago when their internal docs leaked, they also had no support for latest iOS at the time, but had brute force support for older versions as long as phone itself wasn’t too new and had AFU access without brute force for even older versions.

      Moral of the story: if there’s a chance police might take your phone to investigate for a crime you hopefully didn’t even commit, shut down your phone completely - the 5x power button trick on iOS disables biometric unlock, but the device itself stays decrypted and thus more vulnerable. Also keep your OS up to date.

      If you’ve got a phone that’s neither iOS nor GrapheneOS, it’s probably pretty much Swiss cheese anyway. IOS isn’t as good as GrapheneOS either, but it offers some protection against Cellebrite if up to date and BFU. But if they keep your phone for long enough (months, years), they’ll get it unlocked because you can’t install updates that would patch any newly discovered vulnerabilities and one day they’ll find a BFU unlock for it, probably.

      • Zetta@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        Graphene OS in particular comes with a default feature enabled called Auto Reboot to protect against this. I think it’s set to 18 hours by default because that’s what mine is, but you can go as low as 4 hours.

        If you have it set to four hours, I’d wager your phone would reset way before the pigs had enough time to try and get their way in.

        • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 month ago

          Yeah, I have mine at 4 hours and it’s pretty good. It triggers while I’m at work sometimes, but other than that, it’s mostly just when I sleep.

      • Zorsith@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        Grapheneos also has options to just disable data over the USB port when its locked. Or disable it outright.

      • realitista@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        Does a full shutdown encrypt all contents on iOS? This is something that everyone entering the USA as I have to do annually needs to think about.

        • Default Username@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          1 month ago

          Yes, but customs can still compel you to unlock your phone as we have recently seen with the Norweigan tourist who was denied entry due to having a JD Vance meme on his phone.

          I would recommend having a separate phone with non-important data on it to take with you to the US, or have a self hosted cloud service that you can backup your data to before wiping your device.

          You essentially don’t have rights at the border (or in general with the current US government).

        • Natanael@infosec.pub
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 month ago

          It’s all encrypted in storage. The decryption key is in the secure element / TPM chip, additionally protected by your PIN / password. Shutting it down unloads all encryption keys from memory.

          Beware that US customs / immigration / border control can seize your phone and refuse entry.

            • boonhet@sopuli.xyz
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              1 month ago

              They’re not in memory until the first unlock, that’s why there’s the AFU vs BFU distinction for cellebrite unlocking devices incl iPhones.

              But as the other person said, they can seize your phone and refuse entry. If you need to travel to the USA annually and you don’t want them to see your shit, you may want to have a decoy phone that’s not logged into your real accounts or have many photos on it. Just enough to make it believable it’s your real phone, but not enough to help them forge anything on you.

              • realitista@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                1 month ago

                I am a non-resident US citizen so I believe it would be more difficult for them to search and hold me without trial or legal representation. But these days anything is possible.

  • racemaniac@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    Isn’t it likely the police is kind of right?

    I mean, how many people in that community used grapheneos phones before the drug dealers figured out how good they were for their purposes? So in that community, it’s indeed very likely that a grapheneos user is in a drug gang.

    Does that mean that grapheneos is an issue, or bad? Not at all. But i see a lot of digs at the police here at how dumb they are. But if literally most grapheneos users there are drug dealers, is it dumb? It’s just a plain observation that’s pretty correct.

    And it’s kind of logical that proper open source tools that are not full of spyware are better for also such purposes. Doesn’t make these tools a problem. If a politician would now start a crusade against such operating systems, that i would agree is dumb.

    But i don’t see an issue with police somewhere realizing that drugdealers use a specific tool, and focusing on that. Of course sucks for the couple of regular users there that just do it to have control over their device…

    • icegladiator@lemy.lolOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      I think most of the criticism towards police is because they are discriminating based on Google Pixels, which is a completely normal car that you can install GrapheneOS on. It would be like targeting anyone driving a Kia because of the Kia Boys

    • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      That really depends on what they do with that information. If people get arrested for having a pixel, that’s a huge issue. If someone merely gets a closer investigation if they’re suspected of another crime, that’s fine.

      The article is light on details.

    • elucubra@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      Pixel has a market share of 1.5%, so they kind of stand out. Also, there is no such thing as “federales” in Spain. Spain is not a federation. If they are talking about National Police or Guardia civil, they go through a pretty hard entrance exam, and then have a minimum of one year instruction. Executive ranks must have a university degree. Generally reasonably competent. Mossos (regional) and local police are another story. They are quite a bit less competent.

    • Zetta@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      Been on it for ~2 years and never going back, fuck Google, fuck the government.

        • Zetta@mander.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 month ago

          True, with the intention of installing Graphene OS on it. No other options.

          • interdimensionalmeme@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 month ago

            Strange that google is the only option for the only “secure” operating system.
            Hey, do you know what is Ring Level minus One ?

            • Mike@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              1 month ago

              Strange that google is the only option for the only “secure” operating system.

              The have their reasons: https://grapheneos.org/faq#future-devices

              Hey, do you know what is Ring Level minus One ?

              I know you’re only trolling here and I’m feeding into it, but you nerd sniped me just right to explain why your question is stupid on multiple fronts.

              First of all, “Ring -1” is the hypervisor, at least on virtualization-capable devices (which modern Pixels are), and the hypervisor will be Linux’s KVM in this case, which is open source and compiled by the Graphene team as part of the kernel from source.

              Secondly, Arm (which is the architecture basically all phone chips use, including Pixels) has a slightly different model of security, where apps are Exception Level 0, the OS is EL1, the hypervisor is EL2, and the “secure monitor” (or management firmware) is EL3 (and is probably what you were trying to refer to).

              So yeah, I don’t think you know what “Ring -1” is. At least not enough to warrant a snarky comment.

              • interdimensionalmeme@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                1 month ago

                “-1” is not just hypervisors, things like Intel Management and AMD Platform Security Processor can peer into system memory. I have no doubt similar system exist on ARM, I suspect the radio transceiver can also read system memory and read secrets out of the security devices.

                I don’t think modern phones are trustable devices. They are opaque blackboxes, pretending to have high security but this security only really protects the spyware operators from being notices.

                I don’t think it’s coincidence that the most “secure” and “private” operating system only operates on a very narrow model selection of phones from just one manufacturer. Probably because they have the best technology to keep the inherent backdoor invisible and implausible. A backdoor to a system nobody trusts wouldn’t be very useful.

                • Zetta@mander.xyz
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  1 month ago

                  The original post is about how it’s so secure the piggies can’t get in. Unless the super secret backdoor is only for the shadow government to disappear dissidents with no trace, thus keeping their super secret backdoor secret.

      • /home/pineapplelover@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        I’ve also been using it for like 2 years but I really want the hardware of something like the Fairphone. A fairphone or something similar with Graphene would be amazing

        • Zetta@mander.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 month ago

          The Graphene OS people have always been talking about how they eventually intend to develop their own hardware. So, possibly they will make something good eventually.

        • HiramFromTheChi@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 month ago

          You can technically put GrapheneOS on a Fairphone, but it’s not officially supported.

          Long term, the GOS team is looking to branch off from their reliance on Pixels.

  • Bluewing@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    Glances at my new Pixel, Welp, I guess I ain’t ever goin’ to Catalonia. Not that I was planning to go there anyway.

    ***Tinfoil conspiracy: Maybe this a scare tactic to keep the British out of Spain.

  • Erik L. Midtsveen 🏴🌈@lemmy.wtf
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    Update, July 3, 2025 (11:45 AM ET): The crew behind GrapheneOS is understandably none too pleased about their good name being dragged through the mud, and members are speaking out about these reports from Spain. Over on X, the official GrapheneOS account posts:

    >European authoritarians and their enablers in the media are misrepresenting GrapheneOS and even Pixel phones as if they’re something for criminals. GrapheneOS is opposed to the mass surveillance police state these people want to impose on everyone.
    

    Security is a tool, and can be wielded just as much for good as it can for bad. While some people may see this as an indictment, we’d say it’s more the inevitable consequence of GrapheneOS just being very, very good at what it does.

    Yeah, when the media is wrong, GrapheneOS out here correcting the media!

  • rc__buggy@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    Basically, if you don’t have a phone the cops can easily backdoor, you must be a criminal.

    “What do you have to hide?” taken to it’s logical conclusion.

    • Zwuzelmaus@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      Basically, if you don’t have a phone the cops can easily backdoor, you must be a criminal.

      … and if it’s an obscenely expensive one.

      Normal people either can’t afford these devices or don’t have time for all the hassle of installing and using a rare operating system on a phone.

        • sip@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 month ago

          maybe they dumbed down “a custom ROM” or just didn’t want to name GrapheneOS

      • rc__buggy@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        Pixels are mid range if you buy a generation back. I have 6a and paid $250 two years ago.

        No one forces you to root your Pixel, you are allowed to use it with stock android.

        • Bluewing@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 month ago

          Oh my, I hear Google is going to brick the batteries of the 6a just like they did with the 4a phones. Due to worry about them catching fire. So good luck!

          • Rekorse@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 month ago

            Batteries are a part of the device that will wear down over time anyways. The real problem is making them inaccessible. I have no idea how hard it is to replace on a pixel though.

            • Bluewing@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              1 month ago

              It looks to be a pain between the tools needed and the hassle. It supposedly takes between 30 minutes to a couple of hours depending on your skills and some luck.

        • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          1 month ago

          I paid $350 or so for my Pixel 8 refurb. New wasn’t that much more.

          And yeah, the Pixel is fine without a different ROM, I just like what GrapheneOS offers, so I specifically bought it instead of an alternative.

      • Benaaasaaas@group.lt
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        Pixel 9 pro with 512Gb is obscenely expensive. Pixel 8a, with minimal storage is pretty affordable. 7a dare I say cheap.

      • icegladiator@lemy.lolOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        GrapheneOS is most used on old Google Pixels which are anything but “obscenely expensive”

      • IllNess@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        Minimum wage in Spain is €1,300 per month. A Pixel 9a is under $500 and under €550 and currently on sale for $449 and €500. A couple of hundred can get you a Pixel 9. What exactly is a not obscenely price for a flagship phone to you?

        And I don’t even understand your second comment. People spend over an hour a day on social media alone.

        So the normal person in Spain could buy this phone and the normal person in Spain does have the time to figure out how to install a “rare” operating system. A “rare” operating system that’s free and easily copied.

        • MangoCats@feddit.it
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 month ago

          Rare is a matter of popular practice, not difficulty.

          It’s rare to walk around with an actual tinfoil hat, but not difficult or expensive to do.

          • IllNess@infosec.pub
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 month ago

            When someone says “rare operating system”, the word “rare” describes “operating system”.

            Here is the statement again:

            Normal people either can’t afford these devices or don’t have time for all the hassle of installing and using a rare operating system on a phone.

            In your sentence, “rare” is used to describe “it”, a pronoun, which refers to the action “to walk around with an actual tinfoil hat”.

      • Elextra@literature.cafe
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        The A series lines have been the best value smartphones generation after generation. I would not say theyre expensive. I have bought each current gen for about $350 or less (excluding tax), no trade in.

      • TheLowestStone@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        The refurbished pixel 8 I bought cost a fraction of what I’d have paid for a new phone and the installation took 5 minutes.

      • AmbiguousProps@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        You can install Graphene from the browser, it’s really not a huge hassle to install especially if you do it right when you get the phone.

      • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        Normal people either can’t afford these devices or don’t have time for all the hassle

        Had a friend who was getting by on $2k/mo and got herself a $1400 top of the line iPhone, because her carrier gave her a reduction in her monthly payment plan (for an obscene amount of debt and locked-in service on the back end). Her brother jail-broke it for her and did the normal “cleaning off all the bloatware” due-diligence.

        This is just something we all put up with in the modern day. “Normal people” have a harder time navigating the bullshit, but its a lake we all have to paddle through.

    • rottingleaf@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      Humans are apes desiring power, there’s no excuse under which you can give it to them. They’ll invent authority giving them right to judge you and think they are in the right.

      Also why I absolutely despise the Silicon Valley - it’s many such people who think they are the elite now. I want that place detroited as soon as possible. Zuckerberg prosecuted for all the murders he’s committed (I’m certain there are plenty, a person with ASPD with such power just can’t be anything else) which are now unknown, Brin and other jerks playing “cooperating with legal elected authorities” while giving them something with no mandate whatsoever feeling themselves powerful - prosecuted for high treason, all these playing censorship and recommendation - prosecuted for scams on the scale of billions, yadda-yadda.

      Cops saying this should be immediately sued for inciting hate or defamation or whatever against people who don’t want to be backdoored.

      I have a right to not be surveilled, they don’t have a right to surveil me.

      Anyway, I might all the time fly a weird trajectory between various ideologies, but they are all anarchist and Silicon Valley bosses are all thieves.

      • MangoCats@feddit.it
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        they are all anarchist and Silicon Valley bosses are all thieves.

        Nothing is ever absolute, but Silicon Valley has been going in a consistently bad direction for 20+ years now.

  • nroth@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    Hey, the security is nice, but I really like the detailed control over notifications, GMS prompts, and network access. When I used PixelOS, my phone did things I didn’t want it to, and it was hard or impossible to make it stop. On GrapheneOS, the defaults are a pretty good experience. I even recommend it to non-techies since they can use it with the Google apps and its still a more respectful experience, even if they don’t need or want the level of control that I like.

    • nroth@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      TL; DR-- There are many good reasons for regular people to prefer GrapheneOS

        • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 month ago

          Sure, but they’re also not especially likely to be a drug dealer. I’m a GrapheneOS user and bought the Pixel specifically for it, and I’ve never done drugs in my life, much less traffic in them.

  • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    Reminds me of getting a notice in Middle School, decades ago, about how a pager was considered “drug paraphernalia”

    There was also a big Bloomberg-Era push by the NYPD to arrest any woman carrying condoms on her person, on the grounds that a woman carrying a condom must be a sex worker.

    • icegladiator@lemy.lolOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      Everything I hear about Bloomberg make me question how he ran as a democrat, and then I remember he fits the democratic party better than anyone else…

      • Duamerthrax@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        NYC’s greatest act was tricking everyone into thinking it’s a progressive city. I am interested in Mamdani at least.