• IsThisAnAI@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 hour ago

    Because it’s available to anyone. Not just Chinese owned companies and every other auto maker has similar taxes.

  • Fedditor385@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 hours ago

    American manufacturing seems very incapable of change. If things worked this way for decades, why change it? Meanwhile the world moved on and they ask themselves why doesn’t anyone wanna buy american…?

      • Honytawk@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        1 hour ago

        They could try going for quality or features.

        But instead they are only going for size, what 94% of the world does not care for or want. (this includes the 5% of Americans)

        • pugnaciousfarter@literature.cafe
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          55 minutes ago

          Dunno, seems like a global problem. European car companies are scared too. And they don’t make those big cars.

          The only issue I see is that china is very hostile with how it deals with other countries, otherwise this is just the trend of how things work out. In the 80s, it was the japanese car industry.

  • Fair Fairy@thelemmy.club
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 hours ago

    So here is the thing.
    U lost. The moment I need American people to bail you out, you need to treat American people way way the fuck better.

    Worker rights, mandatory vacations, work protections, pensions, guaranteed healthcare etc.

  • thann@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 hours ago

    So they dont care about making cars for the world market, they just want regulations to allow them to milk the american market…

  • Lovable Sidekick@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    10 hours ago

    When Americans of all political stripes finally wake up to global realty, they’ll most likely do it lying on a sidewalk, naked in the rain, with their fingers in their ears saying na-na-na-na-na-na…

    People will eventually have to face that the economic golden age of the 1950s and 60s wasn’t a normal state we can return to if greedy billionaires just let us. The rich definitely grabbed the biggest share of the prosperity, but that brief era of prosperity wasn’t normal, it was entirely abnormal, and it’s been over for quite a while. We’ve been fooling ourselves and keeping it going for the last half century by living on credit, and that’s about to end. I don’t know what new era is about to start, but the American era is over.

  • SoftestSapphic@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    12 hours ago

    Dam maybe some of the American automakers who took billions in subsidies should have built cheaper cars instead of the largest trucks possible to skirt regulations.

    I literally can’t afford an American car, i can afford a BYD tho.

    • lightnegative@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 hours ago

      I can afford neither, but if I had to save up for one it would be the BYD.

      American cars are just large, stupid and inefficient. Also the parts are very expensive here in New Zealand

  • SocialMediaRefugee@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    12 hours ago

    The same thing happened in the 80s with Japan. The Japanese were no longer making crappy cars but small and very reliable, affordable cars. Detroit was still making rust buckets, obsessing over powerful engines with bodies that rotted out and defects galore. Detroit got beaten up badly (Chrysler had to get a gov bailout) until they cleaned up their act and improved their products. Protecting Detroit from competition would’ve just saddled US consumers with decades more of crappy, overpriced, low quality, cars.

    https://imprimis.hillsdale.edu/how-detroits-automakers-went-from-kings-of-the-road-to-roadkill/

    We still don’t let in the small pickups the rest of the world enjoys.

    • Waffle@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 hours ago

      I would kill for a small electric truck… Telo is calling my name, but they don’t have a functioning product yet.

    • ChickenLadyLovesLife@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 hours ago

      defects galore

      A friend of mine from high school attended the GM Institute and became an engineer for them. One of his first projects was on a team that bought a Lexus and an Infiniti when they first came on the market and took them apart to see how many production defects they had. He said a typical American car at the time (and this was in the '90s after quality had rebounded somewhat from its disastrous nadir) had 300-400 defects. The Infiniti they took apart had 2. The Lexus had 0.

  • qyron@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    13 hours ago

    I don’t give two cents for the american auto brands but spare me the drama: try and make a proper car.

    Looking at Ford: try importing a few models from the european line and offer it in the states. Small, economic, somewhat reliable, fuel efficient cars.

    Stellantis has a slew of models that could be brought into the american market. They make good cars.

    And I’m willing to bet GM as a few models they build and market overseas that would be guaranteed sucesses.

    • boonhet@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      12 hours ago

      What Ford European line? They discontinued the Mondeo and their minivans. Now it’s hatch or crappy SUV. Or Mustang. Oh wait. Focus is end of life too now. It’s mustang or crappy crossover SUVs only.

    • Jimmycakes@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      13 hours ago

      Not enough Americans will buy small euro cars. Do you seriously think they wouldn’t just do that if they could justify the cost of switching off a f150 assembly line to make a small car they would. Ford and Chevy both had a ton of small cars throughout the years but the sales aren’t there anymore.

      • CmdrShepard49@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        10 hours ago

        Ford stopped making cars because they can’t compete with the current crop of cars coming from Japan/Korea and Europe regardless of how much money they throw at the problem. They have their niche with trucks and SUVs and are happy to stay there. China builds cars using massive government subsidies, slave labor, and local resources that aren’t available to anyone else in the world which is why I think it’s right to fight against them because it’s impossible to compete against them just like a small local grocery store can’t compete against Walmart.

        • Alcoholicorn@mander.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          31 minutes ago

          China builds cars using massive government subsidies

          The federal government ended the the EV subsidy a few years ago.

          slave labor

          lmao. We know what slavery looks like, you can see it in the cotton fields outside Angola Prison, rows of enslaved people, and overseer on a horse, all behind barbed wire. In Xinjiang I saw farmers driving combine harvesters in roadside fields.

          local resources that arent available

          You’re getting closer. Through 1 and 5 year plans, the CPC uses SoEs (and sometimes just asks private companies “nicely”) to ensure the foundational inputs, steel, rubber, chips, college graduates, etc are all available to industry at the specific price point and volume that competing private firms need to produce say, 100m EVs or a million more apartments.

          Any country can do a little central planning to make sure private industry has what it needs, but this only works if you’re able to take action against companies that exploit the system.

      • AlexLost@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        11 hours ago

        You are wrong. American manufacturers are captured by the oil conglomerates to sell fuel. That’s why you have giant behemoths barrelling down the highways. F150s have almost doubled in size over the last two decades.

    • finitebanjo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      13 hours ago

      Uh, to be clear, I don’t think Michael Dunne is advocating against China in this context. He worked in the Chinese auto sector for decades. He isn’t an alarmist, he’s their salesman.

  • kemsat@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    14 hours ago

    Maybe the USA should heavily invest in the industry of the USA, just like China does, in order to keep up? No, then USian companies would have oversight & have to meet expectations, and we all know that they wouldn’t want that.

    • SocialMediaRefugee@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      12 hours ago

      That would require companies roll profits back into development and their employees instead of pocketing it all, schemes like stock buybacks and wall st traders.

    • Pacattack57@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      12 hours ago

      I hate that the US is like this. People would EASILY pay more for American if the quality was there. But ffs they don’t even try anymore. They just make slop and expect us to pay more for it.

      • kemsat@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        12 hours ago

        Which sucks because I did use to think that “Made in the USA” meant better quality.

    • derpgon@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      14 hours ago

      Also labor price is unmatched. Nobody would work for the wage they give to children in China, so you can’t really go that much cheaper while not sacrificing safety.

      Not saying Chinese cars are that well made.

      • Flagg76@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        13 hours ago

        Very few children work in china right now, Chinese workers even have 5 days of vacation a year by law.

        That’s 5 more than the US…

        There were probably more children working on farms in the US than in china, and I remember something about Florida wanting to reinstate child labour again?

        • fergrg@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 hour ago

          Yes, there may not be child labor. But in places we cannot see, there are still black industry chains. A brick factory was exposed some time ago. They let some people with low IQ or disabilities work. They were not given masks, and the air was full of dust. They may work more than ten hours a day or even more. What is the difference between this and slavery? I just want to give this example to illustrate that there are still many black-hearted factories in society, and there is also the possibility of employing child labor. In China, young people who have not studied will choose to work in factories, but they must be at least 16 years old. If they are younger, they will not be hired. Back to the issue of BYD, although we are proud that it can be recognized by the world as a Chinese brand, and many people in China also buy it. But recently there have been some news that they blindly work overtime within the company, and have meetings after get off work, etc. Someone exposed the chat records within the company. We are all ordinary people. We just want to fight for our rights. Even if it is a big company, as long as it exploits people, we must oppose it.

      • Dearth@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        13 hours ago

        China has compulsory education for children just like America. There’s no child labor in China.

        They pay adult workers less in China, but these yuan has 7x buying power than the dollar in China

        • derpgon@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          12 hours ago

          That’s what Chinese propagandists want you to think, there are way more people living in (borderline) poverty (per capita) than in the US.

          Social media is being fed with a slice of mainland China, but anything beyond that is people struggling to keep ends meet.

      • Almacca@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        13 hours ago

        They’re being pretty ruthless about grabbing all the world’s resources to make them as well.

        • Flagg76@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          13 hours ago

          No the rest of the world has been sleeping when China silently bought all the mines and harbors in the past decades.

          • Honytawk@feddit.nl
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            58 minutes ago

            China is performing a new colonialism. Exploiting poor countries for their cheap resources.

            While the rest of the world is trying to steer away from it because it is so horrible. So please, don’t praise China for it.

          • iridebikes@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            13 hours ago

            If our CEOs and business leaders are supposedly the world’s best, why didn’t they spent their capital shutting China down instead of their lavish lifestyles and payouts for their wealthy stockholders? I guess they aren’t as good at running businesses as they claim to be.

    • Jimmycakes@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      13 hours ago

      Have you seen those byd cars on YouTube. Their mid price cars look like high end Mercedes over here. Meanwhile Ford and Chevy will sell you a $75000 pickup with all plastic interior.

      None of the legacy companies are competing. Ever. The best we can hope for is rivian and other new players filling the gap.

      • Dave.@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        12 hours ago

        I’ve test driven a few BYD models here in Australia. 50 thousand dollarydoos for an electric car that goes 400+km, can power your house in a blackout, has all the normal electric car performance (6 seconds to 100kmhr) and is chock full of user comforts and safety features.

        There are a LOT of these getting around in Brisbane, and for good reason. I didn’t get one this time round, but by the time the lease expires on my Volvo EX30 in 4 years, I’ll be looking pretty hard at BYD. Especially if they get their new solid state batteries going by then.

    • interdimensionalmeme@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      14 hours ago

      The income stream would disappear, their operations would collapse and that would just be the end. There would not be another manufacturer that would flourish in the void left behind. Without the institutional know how and the existing structure, supply chain the current car manufacturing industry would never be able to restart if it ever stopped.

      The social darwinism of the globalist free market is meant for crushing the spirit and bargaining power of individual workers, they are replaceable, disposable, interchangeable. General Motors and Ford aren’t.

      • Jimmycakes@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        11 hours ago

        I think that’s kind of the point. What the current case industry is doing is getting them smoked. They need to let go of the past the “institutional knowledge” that’s exactly why Ford and Chevy won’t compete with Chinese EV. Those are built from the ground up for the modern era with modern leadership modern supply chains building institutional knowledge that matters today and into the future. I would love nothing more than to drive a Ford EV. I am considering the f150 lightning but in comparison to things I see online it’s really far behind.

        • AA5B@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          8 hours ago

          The problem is the world is transitioning to EVs, and burying your head in the sand won’t change that. Legacy manufacturers could be trying to find their place in the new world while they can, or they can stick with technology of the past, let someone else come to dominate the new technologies, and be left with a ever shrinking market until they disappear

        • interdimensionalmeme@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          10 hours ago

          Well they’d have to cut c-suite and shareholder’s cut because everything else that could be squeezed out has already been squeezed out, so the c-suite and shareholder will convert their money into the political power it takes to just block out the competition.

  • zeca@lemmy.eco.br
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    15 hours ago

    So when can we stop with this “free markets” nonsense in the third world aswell??

    • Itdidnttrickledown@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      15 hours ago

      There hasn’t every been a free market. Its a captive market. When you can only succeed by denying a competitor into a market you prove that. They refuse to rist to the challenge because they don’t have to.