• altphoto@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    20 hours ago

    Simply get a remote camera. You can place it in the back of your back pack. Then just pretend to be looking the other way. You don’t have to look at the video as it is happening.

    • DeathByBigSad@sh.itjust.worksOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      20 hours ago

      Oh wow this is the most genius method yet.

      No eye-contact mean a very low chance of confrontation.

      I’m gonna see what I can find for this

      • GreenKnight23@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        9 hours ago

        don’t forget to get some XR glasses so you’re sure to get all the action in-frame.

        1000001704

        and a hoodie to cover all the wires.

      • altphoto@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        20 hours ago

        With a small action cam Velcroed. It could be in a soda can too…just place the soda can strategically and walk away. Pick it up later.

        • anomnom@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          17 hours ago

          Those 360 cams would be decent for this because they don’t need aiming and you can zoom in on the interesting action after the fact.

  • FarraigePlaisteaċ@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    23 hours ago

    I would have a shirt with a hole cut in the breast pocket. Then point a phone camera out while it records.

    A few details: you’ll want a busy pattern on the shirt to make the hole less noticeable. You’ll also want an app that can record without easily being stopped (the default camera on my phone can be interfered with just by moving around inside a pocket).

      • onslaught545@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        19 hours ago

        You can get hidden cameras in pretty much anything. There’s stuff line pens with a camera built in.

      • NABDad@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 day ago

        Assuming the lenses can be removed and replaced, opticians should be able to cut prescription lenses to fit.

        When my wife had her practice, we had a machine that could cut patterns using the frame. Then the pattern is used to cut the lenses. I’m sure it’s even easier today.

    • archonet@lemy.lol
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 day ago

      That sounds like a fine way to have your (presumably expensive) drone carrying your (presumably also expensive) camera hit with buckshot.

      I’m not saying don’t try anyways. But there’s a good chance the gestapo just starts blastin’.

        • archonet@lemy.lol
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          11 hours ago

          I’m not saying you’re wrong, but: has anyone in Ukraine actually tried a shotgun?

          I generally try to avoid watching anything that’ll scar my psyche, but, as far as I’m aware soldiers in the field don’t usually carry shotguns, but rifles, in the anticipation of dealing with enemies wearing body armor/at some distance. And hitting a moving drone with a rifle, yes absolutely that’d be a bitch – one projectile is not enough, especially for an erratic moving target.

          Police (and I’m assuming ICE as well), generally dealing with people not equipped with body armor, tend to keep shotguns handy for a multitude of reasons (breaching doors, not overpenetrating through walls, etc), and skeet shooting is already a thing (though admittedly it would still be harder if the drone was moving erratically).

          All this is to say: I don’t know anything for a fact, because I’ve tried to avoid watching anything that’ll scar me, but has anyone in Ukraine on either side had access to a shotgun or two before getting turned into gibs? because I can absolutely believe that soldiers with rifles would fail to shoot a drone, but I wouldn’t be so quick to discount a couple people with shotguns unless that’s already a solution the Russians tried before the cope cages. Especially in the context of just filming them, your drone probably isn’t moving very fast or flying very high if you’re trying to get a good shot.

          • HasturInYellow@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            9 hours ago

            They have tried shotguns, nets, other drones, rocks, food cans, their guns when they run out of ammo, swinging their guns like a bat and many other things.

            The drones are often used to attack inside established dugouts and such. They fly into the front door. So the defenders often do have shotguns and specifically for that purpose.

            Drones are hard to hit, though.

            • archonet@lemy.lol
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              7 hours ago

              fair enough, goes to show the gaps in my knowledge – but after seeing one guy desperately trying to crawl away with his legs blown off before being blown up by a second drone, I decided that was all the Ukraine footage I needed to see.