Time to unfollow them, I guess.

  • Obinice@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 days ago

    Makes sense, we pay our licence fee for our public service, why should people abroad get for free what we have to pay for?

    I was happy with the current arrangement of adverts supporting the service use abroad, but if it has to migrate to a subscription model to meet modern demands then that’s the way it is.

    I wouldn’t go to another country and ask them to make one of their government’s national public services free for me to use, after all.

    • crapwittyname@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 days ago

      Nah mate. Information is free the second it leaves its source. Any attempt to curtail it after then is just a cunts trick.

      • TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 days ago

        I imagine you wouldn’t be saying this if it was your work being used.

        If you went through the painstaking effort or writing a book or something, I imagine you’d be pretty unhappy if nobody wanted to reimburse you, and you were called a cunt for wanting to be paid for your labour.

          • TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 day ago

            That’s exactly my point.

            Presumably you’re paid for the work you do, and you shouldn’t have to do it for free, yes?

    • NigelFrobisher@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 days ago

      The world service was always free because it’s a propaganda platform that promotes Britain and British values abroad. I guess they are content just to push Reform propaganda to a domestic audience from now on.