Forester@yiffit.net to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 year agorollin' coalyiffit.netimagemessage-square138fedilinkarrow-up10arrow-down10
arrow-up10arrow-down1imagerollin' coalyiffit.netForester@yiffit.net to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 year agomessage-square138fedilink
minus-squareNegativeInf@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up0·1 year agoBoth have a storage problem. But coal has a destroys the atmosphere problem. So, yes, trade-offs.
minus-squaredeegeese@sopuli.xyzlinkfedilinkarrow-up0·1 year agoYou’re moving the goalposts after they debunked the first claim.
minus-square9bananas@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up0·1 year ago“debunking” requires a source… otherwise they just put forth a claim
Both have a storage problem. But coal has a destroys the atmosphere problem. So, yes, trade-offs.
You’re moving the goalposts after they debunked the first claim.
“debunking” requires a source… otherwise they just put forth a claim