• eodur@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    17 days ago

    How about Delta Chat? At least as secure as Signal, open source, and decentralized.

  • Nima@leminal.space
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    17 days ago

    signal requires a phone number and won’t even allow you to send sms to those that aren’t on signal.

    its better, but still not great.

    • TeddE@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      17 days ago

      It used to function as a fallback SMS/MMS messenger (like how iMessage does) but when Google started moving to convert Android from SMS/MMS to RCS Signal made the hard decision to cut the fallback functionality rather than follow Google’s new framework.

      I personally hope once the dust settles Signal designs a RCS engine and restores the fallback functionality.

      • oppy1984@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        17 days ago

        Yeah killing the sms function was basically a deal breaker for me, no matter how much I tried I could only get three people to use Signal, the rest were all sms. When the sms feature was removed 2 of the 3 dropped Signal completely, so now the only person I know who still uses it is my mom and even she still flips back and forth between Signal and Google messages when texting me.

        I still have Signal on my phone and suggest it people when they ask how to contact me, but everyone just wants to text my phone number.

      • Nima@leminal.space
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        17 days ago

        if they need my phone number to have an account anyway, they can offer both.

        i dont need more apps that do the same thing. i need less.

        • FooBarrington@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          17 days ago

          It’s arguably a very bad idea for a secure messenger to also provide an SMS interface, since those are basically cleartext

            • FooBarrington@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              edit-2
              16 days ago

              What? You use a secure messenger to send secure messages. It doesn’t make sense for a secure messenger to offer sending insecure messages (SMS).

              Edit: oh, you’re probably referring to why it requires a phone number. This seems to be due to abuse/spam prevention, as otherwise creating new accounts to spam people with is basically free.

              • Nima@leminal.space
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                16 days ago

                using the phone number is still a pretty unnecessary risk, imho.

                there’s no real need for it any longer.

                • FooBarrington@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  16 days ago

                  Do you have a better approach to prevent spam in mind? Without a barrier of entry it becomes a serious issue.

  • Steven Tree Baxter@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    15 days ago

    Compare with Zangi Private Messenger. Yes, every country who has jurisdiction has access. Just ask yourself, which gov do I trust more with my private chats?

  • Humanius@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    17 days ago

    After Trump was elected and inaugurated, Signal has finally been gaining some steam here in the Netherlands.

    Its still an American company, so its not ideal. But it’s still significantly better better than letting Facebook have control over the most commonly used chat app.

    WhatsApp needs to go and Signal is the most likely way in which we can achieve that. We can worry about the American elephant in the room later.

    • viking@piefed.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      17 days ago

      There is threema, a Swiss messenger that gained some popularity earlier since they had end to end encryption before whatsapp.

      Unfortunately the source code is not open (even though they do get annual audits with public reports), and the client costs 3 EUR or something (once).

      • philpo@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        17 days ago

        And Switzerlands records in terms of privacy sadly is far worse than most people think - even with the last attack being repelled.

        Matrix (preferably on a non-matrix.org instance) currently is the preferable non US and privacy friendly way.

        • rhabarba@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          17 days ago

          I don’t know - this hype about Matrix reminds me of XMPP which was similarly popular a decade ago. Today, nobody even remembers it anymore.

          • philpo@feddit.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            17 days ago

            Which hype? Matrix as a protocol is used for a decade now, especially by various big governments (French, Luxembourg and German governmental messenger, various German states, German and Polish armed forces, German healthcare messenger, various smaller projects in Latin America), is bridgeable (I currently have it bridged to Whatsapp and Signal amongst others) but I really don’t see a hype - on the contrary I only see people predicting me the immediate apocalypse of Matrix for 5 years now, currently due to matrix.org (one of a hundred instances) introducing a premium account model for the most cost intensive (heavily media sharing)users. (See below for that).

      • Humanius@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        17 days ago

        Yeah, but Threema has basically no momentum behind it at all at this point.
        I’m putting my social capital behind the option that currently stands the most chance of beating out Whatsapp

          • Humanius@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            17 days ago

            Then by all means keep that momentum going.
            I’m just looking at this from a Dutch perspective, where Signal is seeing by far the most growth.

            • rhabarba@feddit.org
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              17 days ago

              You can help making it stronger. That’s what I did in Germany: if people want to contact me, I usually give them my Threema ID first, everything else comes later.

              • Humanius@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                edit-2
                17 days ago

                But my goal is not to move to Threema, my goal is to move away from Whatsapp.
                Signal fits the bill while expending far less social capital convincing people to use it.

        • ornery_chemist@mander.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          16 days ago

          FYI, while Threema front-end clients (apps) are open-source (and offer reproducible builds, which is surprisingly uncommon in open-source land), the server component, though supposedly audited, remains closed-source.

        • viking@piefed.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          14 days ago

          That’s just the client, the server architecture is what really matters.

    • Kualdir@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      17 days ago

      Sadly many still don’t want to switch. My most active chats are in signal now but the large majority of chats are still on whatsapp

        • Humanius@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          17 days ago

          Not all of them.

          I have a non-official chat group with some colleagues, and a chat group for the neighbourhood that are not likely moving just because I am refusing to use Whatsapp. It would just result in me missing out on those chat groups.

          Currently I just have both installed, and that is also how I try to convince people to install and try out Signal.

    • ZMoney@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      16 days ago

      America is not a monolith. Signal’s developers are very much aware of the risks of operating there and probably already have several escape plans given recent developments. I also think five-eyes probably has access but getting it might be computationally expensive.

      • Humanius@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        16 days ago

        But being based in the United States it is still subject to American laws, and that comes with the risk of potential American spying and embargoes. Software from any American entity (be it coorporation or non-profit) comes with that risk.

  • kirk781@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    17 days ago

    There are many such apps. The page links to EFF one which ranked some messaging apps and included stuff like Threema (though good luck getting anyone to use it because it’s a paid version). Then, there is Briar, available on F Droid as well, which runs on a decentralised model but I don’t think I know anyone IRL who has even heard of it.

    Telegram, I think, Atleast in my country is the second most popular thing behind WhatsApp but in it’s default state, it’s less secure and one needs to enable e2e encryption(read : secret chats).

    I am willing to move to almost any service ( I mean, I still use IRC, so…) but the main point is would anyone I know be on them?

    • vividspecter@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      17 days ago

      Signal has been a good option because you can get “normal” people to use it, which hasn’t been true for many of the alternatives (except Telegram, but that’s a mess).

      • pycorax@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        17 days ago

        The problem is that it was easier to get people to move to Telegram since it had an abundance of features compared to WhatsApp which was compelling for the average person that doesn’t care about encryption. Signal doesn’t have any of these features that make it enticing for the person.

    • Chronographs@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      17 days ago

      If you quickly uninstall it because you don’t know anyone using it sounds like you’re part of the problem, if someone you know installs it to try it out that’s one less person they see as well. Personally I got the vast majority of my friend group to move to it years ago by just saying like “hey Facebook sucks we should move to signal”. If you don’t want to do that should at least leave it installed it’s not like it’s taking up much space

      • kirk781@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        17 days ago

        Quickly as in I had it for multiple months. Just like I did with Threema and Briar and XMPP apps and what not. Nobody ever showed up. There was a time when I was carrying more chat apps than folks I used to chat with

        There is technically one phonebook contact of mine on Signal but he primarily uses Telegram as primary chat thingy.

        It then occurred to me that IRL most folks don’t care about chat apps. They care about chatting. The most I have seen folks are on Whatsapp, Telegram and Snapchat (last of which is really bad).

    • pheonixdown@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      17 days ago

      Signal used to be the best answer to this conundrum, since it would use its own internal protocols if it could or fall back to SMS if it couldn’t, unfortunately they decided to drop SMS support a few years ago, citing users that sent sensitive information not realizing they were using SMS (that always felt kinda flimsy). I really disliked this change, because it raised the difficulty of adoption, from just getting people to replace their default app with Signal to making them manage multiple apps.

      Now though, you basically need to advocate socially for the change you want to see in the world. Anecdotally, I started using Signal when they still supported SMS to talk with 1 friend group, and eventually convinced most of my closest family groups to also use it, many after SMS support was dropped. Apart from 1 tech illiterate elderly couple and 1 extended family member, I haven’t received any personal (non-company related) text messages in like 5 months.

      • dustyData@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        17 days ago

        The sad truth is that the majority of people are treating WhatsApp exactly as a social network. It is there to send memes and stickers. See what others are up to without having to interact. Then mindlessly scroll through reels. Ocassionally purchase something via chat with a corporate bot.

    • rhabarba@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      17 days ago

      A few friends of mine use Threema, because they care about privacy and are more than happy to pay to have it. Signal comes third, behind Telegram, even.

  • Jaberw0cky@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    16 days ago

    My wishlist is an app which is not linked to a phone number, is multi platform and has a web app. It should be none US and open source. That isn’t too many requirements and yet nothing seems to full fit the bill? Anyway good luck trying to get school parent’s groups to use something other than WhatsApp.

  • falynns@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    16 days ago

    Humans are too stupid to switch from convenience to slightly less convenience even if they get privacy for free. Any amount of discomfort is too much and changing an app is basically death.

    • Vanilla_PuddinFudge@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      16 days ago

      They see no value in it. They don’t see that privacy is proactive measure that can protect you.

      On Facebook, especially in my family, accounts get lost and hacked. One fine day, it might be someone with more influence in the family who’s attacker might make off with stolen bank information or passwords.

      but “that’ll never happen”, right?

  • adbenitez@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    16 days ago

    so a centralized American messenger enshitified, lets switch to the next centralized American messenger, it surely will not enshitify in the future, lets ignore the actual problem, what could go wrong

  • Chaotic Entropy@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    16 days ago

    I would like nothing more, but so few of my contact group are willing to switch away… despite all of Meta’s bullshit. I resent being made to use it whilst their AI/ads encroach further and further.

  • herseycokguzelolacak@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    17 days ago

    I don’t use Signal because they don’t release the app in F-Droid. Signal devs refuse to release the app outside of Google Play Store, which is very evil.

    • vga@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      17 days ago

      I don’t, the GrapheneOS folks say that F-Droid is a potential security catastrophe.

      You can find Molly from Accrescent (and apparently also from F-Droid if you must use that), which is not so much a security catastrophe.

    • AmbiguousProps@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      17 days ago

      You can use Molly from F-Droid. They even have a full FOSS version that you can set up a self hosted notification socket for, to avoid Google Firebase.

    • L_Acacia@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      17 days ago

      I use obtainium to install it and it works flawlessly. The reason they don’t publish it elsewhere is due to licences and push notifications iirc

      • herseycokguzelolacak@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        17 days ago

        I know I can. But the hostility of Signal devs to open source and F-Droid makes me uncomfortable. Why use an app with such hostility?

  • maxo@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    16 days ago

    I will switch to signal when I can avoid installing stuff on bunch of my devices. Until web version is available, sorry it hard for me to switch and for me to convince other people to switch.

      • Vanilla_PuddinFudge@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        16 days ago

        I believe in it,… for now.

        I moved my family group to xmpp to have more personal control over our chats. Signal seems benevolent, but I’ve seen this play out before. Will it stay that way? We treat online forums with the idea that federstion works to stop enshittificstion. I believe XMPP is a good model for federating secure chatrooms for the same reason: People should control the voices of the people, not companies.

    • psud@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      16 days ago

      I use it mostly for family chats, I got the extended family to use it rather than Facebook Messenger

      What makes you not trust signal as against WhatsApp?

  • Kevnyon@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    16 days ago

    I wish I could do this, but trying to convince people to ditch an app they’ve never had problems with and where they all have their family, friends, work groups and school groups already mashed together, how do you convince them? Its not even about me convincing my friends or family, its about everyone else doing the same and when everyone has so many contacts in WhatsApp, that number starts to snowball real quick. Its just not feasible to try and explain this to someone who literally doesn’t care. I mean even though I myself know what Meta is and how Zuck is complete asshole, I still can’t switch off of WhatsApp because nobody I know is on Signal and I’d just be alone there. What’s the point? WhatsApp is pretty much the first app anyone installs on their phone (regardless of platform), they’re not gonna switch now.

    • orgrinrt@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      16 days ago

      Well, just an anecdote:

      I simply deleted my WhatsApp and moved to signal. Just did it.

      People installed the app, at least the ones that cared about staying in touch. Which was most everyone I cared about staying in touch with. A few of my friend groups also moved the group chat to signal, though all of them do have other ones with the people who didn’t care enough to move too, but I hear it isn’t that big a deal, they had multiple groups before and will have in future, doesn’t really feel like any extra hassle they say.

      It’s been fine. No problems. I’ve had more trouble trying to explain to my extended family why I’m no longer posting on instagram. Those I never had in WhatsApp either back in the day, so they “stayed in touch” by watching my pictures I suppose. But I just consistently tell people they can reach me always via signal or plain old sms.

      I guess the biggest thing to be scared about would be fomo for most, but I don’t really care enough, I’ve got so much going on already that it’s more of a blessing that I don’t have to be involved in every conversation or meme sharing or whatever.

      It really gets so easy after simply switching. Just do it and that’s that. The people worth anything come with you, it’s just another app and another group chat or personal chat. Most already have discord and the meta messenger whatever its name is these days anyway. I know zero people with only one messenger/chat app and unsplintered groups across them. It’s not a big chore, and if it is, there’s always sms.

    • iegod@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      16 days ago

      Yep. I know the details. I’m tech savvy enough, but I use what my contacts use, and I’m not leaving WhatsApp. Same goes for youtube. The content I consume is there. There is no suitable alternative until the content creators switch. It’s not really about the technology at all.

    • oakward@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      16 days ago

      Just ditch WhatsApp. Don’t give in to social pressure to install malware on your phone

      • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        16 days ago

        The problem is there’s no one on signal that I want to talk to. So “just ditch the app” isn’t actually helpful.

          • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            15 days ago

            " It’s not that hard really all you have to do is be around people who already want to move over". Yeah thanks for that advice.

            I have a very similar strategy to being rich, step one is to be rich already. Simplicity itself.

              • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                edit-2
                14 days ago

                Why are you being intentionally disingenuous?

                I will say it again just so it’s stated.
                People are not going to move to another service unless they can obviously see the benefit in moving to that service. People who are not technically inclined (that doesn’t mean stupid) are not going to see the benefit.

                Don’t be rude about people you don’t know anything about. Don’t insult their intelligence just because they’re not as interested in a very niche area of technology as you are.

                spoiler

                Why are you friend with stupid people?

                Also note that if you are going to be rude about people you know nothing about, you had better check your grammar

      • Kevnyon@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        16 days ago

        There’s nobody on Signal, that’s the problem. If I want to miss out on all of my group conversations, work conversations, messages between myself and others, then yeah, I can switch. But if I want to receive any messages at all, I have to keep WhatsApp installed.

    • ElcidBarrett@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      16 days ago

      WhatsApp is pretty much the first app anyone installs on their phone

      Is this really the case?

      Maybe it’s a regional thing. I’m in the northeast US, and nearly everyone I know uses Facebook Messenger as their main form of communication, even people who don’t touch Facebook at all. I hate Messenger for the same reasons that people hate WhatsApp, but I still have to use it because my entire social circle does. If I want to message someone outside Messenger without giving my phone number out, I use my Google Voice number.

      I’ve only ever used WhatsApp to talk to work contacts overseas, and I’ve only ever used Signal to talk to paranoid drug dealers, which is a use case that’s mostly been replaced by Telegram now.

      • bystander@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        16 days ago

        Outside of North America, most other countries’ use WhatsApp as a choice for personal and business uses is WhatsApp. Rest are mostly dominated by Facebook messenger. Excluding China which has WeChat domestically.

        How Meta was ever allowed to buy WhatsApp without triggering anti-trust laws is beyond me.

        Some numbers

        Many of my European and South American friends are having a hard time because that’s where all their families and friends back home are, and it’s hard to get them to use something new, especially the older folks.

    • vga@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      17 days ago

      And would have FOSS implementations of reference server & client + an openly specified protocol.

      Like Matrix.

      • Flipper@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        17 days ago

        Matrix still has it’s problems. All the meta data is still saved on every server permanently.

        There is still space to improve from there.