Edit: What do you judge them for?

    • Krudler@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      22 days ago

      Same thing for me in Canada.

      You cannot seriously buy into all of the values that Canada, as a country, has demonstrated for the last several hundred years.

      You have to be the biggest ignoramus in the world to ignore how many social problems Canada (as an entity) is responsible for and fails to address in a meaningful ongoing way.

      • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        21 days ago

        I mean, it can mean opposition to the US way, which is basically the old British Empire way. The polls bear this out, too - patriotism is correlated with voting left and tolerance in Canada.

          • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            16 days ago

            Not for many decades, and things have changed a lot. That’s what I’m saying, new Canada is kind of opposite to old Canada (which flew the Union Jack until 1965), and old Canada is dying out.

            You could argue that’s not the actual state of things, but like I said, the hard data indicates most people at least see it that way.

  • ramble81@lemmy.zipOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    23 days ago

    For me, it’s a “thin blue line” sticker. I immediately think the person is racist.

    • artifex@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      23 days ago

      On two occasions I made a louder-than-necessary comment to my kids to stay away from those people (MAGA hats too) while they were within earshot and then listed reasons why. Got some dirty looks, but no one ever approached me. Because they’re a bunch of feckless cowards.

    • Ledericas@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      19 days ago

      i seen so many of them on suvs in a blue area, even on the uniforms of tradespeople who does maitenance for grocery stories, dont want to see it , we already know/.

    • Empricorn@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      22 days ago

      What, just because they’re making it clear it’s not “protect & serve”, but instead “us vs. them”?

      It’s The Coward’s Swastika ". Pretty much anyone who flies it is racist and a bootlicker. They’re just afraid to fly the Nazi or Confederate flag…

    • winky_lem@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      21 days ago

      Ugh, yes. Seriously, Elon aside, what kinda GIGA-DOUCHE does a person have to be, to see that thing and think “Wow! I must have one!”

  • kcweller@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    23 days ago

    Brand clothing plastered with logos of the brand.

    I immediately know you’re vacuous and live your life for the image you have for others instead of focusing on yourself.

    • shalafi@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      23 days ago

      My wife’s Filipino and that’s just their style, like they’re stuck in the 80s.

    • ArcaneSlime@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      23 days ago

      Same, sort of. For me it varies, some is supposed to be a status symbol and that I find lame.

      But some are signals about a person; Bass Pro, fisherman; Backwoods, down to smoke; Burton, snowboarder; Venture, skateboarder; etc. These I see more as a band shirt, like “hey I like that thing/band too, wanna hang out?” These I actually like, they can be informative.

      And some are just free shirts from work itself, vendors to your work, events, etc. Maybe they just got off and are still in “uniform” (if you can call a company t-shirt a uniform lmao), maybe their job sells a lot of Kawasaki and they sent shirts to the dealership they work at, this falls more into the informative category and indicate possible hobbies. Same with the event shirts, it’s more about a memory of the event, it indicates possible hobbies like running or biking, and hell a free shirt is a free shirt.

      Hell even the status symbol shirts, I guess do the same thing in signaling something about a person, but imo it signals that

      you’re vacuous and live your life for the image you have for others instead of focusing on yourself.

  • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    21 days ago

    It’s not judgement so much as a red flag, but those sunglasses that are like a solid cylinder wrapping around your head. They’re popular with manosphere dudebros, which is unfortunate because I actually kind of like them.

    Lifted pickups that I know cost more than a modest house. It’s the same as buying a sports car, except you’re also posing as a humble working man simultaneously.

  • Mark@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    23 days ago

    One of those big trucks but they are immaculate, clean, scuff free. So not used for they are meant for: working.

    Now they are just taking up space and being dangerous to the public just to try and help prop up someone’s ego.

    • RBWells@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      21 days ago

      Yeah I see them parked at my office and always think - someone drove that enormous truck here, then went up the elevator to their office job. What the fuck?

      I apologize for the misandry but also we have a saying down here - the bigger the truck, the smaller the cock. If you don’t need a work truck for your work, you ought not get a work truck, it’s stupid expensive and gas guzzling. I judge you.

    • Opinionhaver@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      23 days ago

      Do you judge people driving clean, scuff free vans as well or only truck drivers?

      I use my truck for work but other than having a roof rack you probably wouldn’t be able to tell it’s a work truck from the outside. When it gets dirty, I wash it, and when it gets dents or scratches I fix them. I don’t want it to look like a beater.

      • d00ery@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        23 days ago

        A 4x4 truck with its big wheels and high ground clearance are features that allow the truck to move off-road. These features have the unfortunate side effect of making them dangerous to other road users, and very uneconomical / environmentally unfriendly. They also take up a lot of space.

        Work vans are and most cars are capable of driving on a building site or track.

        • Opinionhaver@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          23 days ago

          Hood height, engine size, and the physical exterior dimensions of many vans are similar to those of pickup trucks. When used for work, it often just comes down to personal preference. One key difference is towing capacity - most vans are limited to around 750 kg, whereas trucks typically offer much more. Mine can tow up to 3000 kg.

          Edit: Also, rear visibility in a van is much worse due to the enclosed cargo area. With a truck, you pretty much have 360-degree visibility.

          • BorgDrone@feddit.nl
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            23 days ago

            most vans are limited to around 750 kg, whereas trucks typically offer much more. Mine can tow up to 3000 kg.

            Yeah that’s bullshit. Vans that can do the max of 3500kg are common as fuck. You probably looked at the wrong spec. 750kg is the max for a trailer without brakes, regardless of type of car. There are usually two numbers on the spec sheet, one for max towing weight for unbraked trailers and one for braked trailers.

            • Opinionhaver@feddit.uk
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              23 days ago

              True, my bad. Many of the most commonly used vans here can tow 2500kg as long as the trailer has brakes. Anything more than that is rare though. Even many of the other mid-size pickups can’t tow 3000kg.

              • BorgDrone@feddit.nl
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                23 days ago

                It may depend on local laws. Here the total weight of the combination (car + trailer) with a B+E driving license is 7000Kg, and 3500Kg for a car. That means you can have a van with 3500Kg capacity plus a 3500Kg trailer. So naturally there are vans that are built to match the max spec.

          • Bytemeister@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            22 days ago

            Ford makes (or at least made) and E-350 van. It can tow anything your truck can. And seat 11 people. And keep your equipment secured and safe from the elements. And it has a backup camera.

            • Opinionhaver@feddit.uk
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              edit-2
              22 days ago

              This applies to vans just as well though. This Ford Transit is little over a meter longer than a Toyota Hilux so these pictures are roughly to scale.

              • medgremlin@midwest.social
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                edit-2
                21 days ago

                But the front/hood is much shorter in length. Also, people driving that type of van are much more likely to be doing so in a professional capacity and are significantly less likely to be asshole drivers fucking around with their phone while driving. People are bad drivers at baseline quite frequently, but if someone is on the job in a van used for commercial purposes, they’re more likely to at least be paying attention and not speeding everywhere.

                Edit: I marked up your image to illustrate the point made much more eloquently in the video. Because of the length of the hood, the truck has a much longer distance of road obstructed from view in front of it, and this is with a standard truck that doesn’t have one of the very popular lift kits (and assuming that the driver is relatively tall.)

                • Opinionhaver@feddit.uk
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  21 days ago

                  If there’s a 70 cm tall child standing in front of the vehicle, then in either case the child either would or wouldn’t be visible - there’s effectively no difference. It doesn’t really matter whether you can see 2 or 3 meters more of the road surface from one vehicle or the other. In both cases, the hood height is the same, and that’s what determines the safety in the event of a pedestrian collision.

                  Also, with a van, the rear visibility is greatly reduced compared to a pickup. You could say that can be compensated for with cameras - but that same argument applies to the front visibility as well.

                  Let’s also keep in mind where this discussion started from: a commenter was taking issue with clean, scuff-free pickups as if a work truck couldn’t look like that.

      • Mark@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        22 days ago

        Yeah Sorry, I should have said I’m not American. I’m Dutch. I’ve been to the USA and these things “fit” better in a car-centric society. At least there is room.

        But even there I still question it’s usefulness, you cannot see right in front of you. You’d miss wheelchairs, children, etc. And van’s can usually carry more the the flatbed of a truck.

        • Opinionhaver@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          22 days ago

          I’m not American either - I’m from Finland. I’ve been to the Netherlands, and I can’t quite imagine owning a truck there either.

          However, your criticism was about clean, scuff-free trucks broadly. If you had said that you judge people for owning a truck when they have no practical need for one, I wouldn’t have any issue with that. But that’s not what you said.

          I don’t own one of those gigantic American trucks, but a mid-size one - think Toyota Hilux, Ford Ranger, Mitsubishi L200, Nissan Navara, or Isuzu D-Max. The external dimensions and hood height on those are comparable to similarly sized work vans. So when someone needs a vehicle capable of hauling cargo, it’s basically a choice between a truck and a van - and there’s not much difference between the two in terms of pedestrian safety.

          I’d even argue a truck might be safer, because you generally have better all-around visibility. Vans tend to have very limited rear visibility due to the enclosed cargo area. You could argue that a van is more convenient for hauling certain types of cargo, but that’s a separate discussion about practicality - not safety.

          • Mark@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            22 days ago

            Well I agree. My first reaction was a bit tongue-in-cheek. On purpose to conjure a very specific image; A person owning a huge monster truck without the intention of using it for it’s intended purpose but for propping up one’s ego.

            A Toyoto Hilux is not something I would consider. More along the lines of: https://www.hotcars.com/the-sickest-lifted-trucks-weve-seen-in-2020/

            Or these: p.s. Vans have camera’s these days, allowing you to even see the ground underneath your fender. So even better then you could ever get with just your mirror’s.

    • Passerby6497@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      23 days ago

      I call those brodozers, and I hate those drivers. I’ve damned near gotten hit by them so many times cuz they can’t see shit over their hood

      • Postmortal_Pop@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        22 days ago

        I love that my dinky hatchback has more get up and go then they do, they get so fucking offended when you zoom off from a light next to them.

    • gerryflap@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      22 days ago

      We have a few of those here in the Netherlands and it’s so ridiculous it’s almost sad. These big American trucks really aren’t fit for Dutch roads. They’re too large for the roads, they don’t fit in any parking lot, and they look ridiculous next to any normal car. I could sort of understand that a farmer would have them, but even then it can’t be that useful because it must be a hassle any time the truck needs to pass through a city or village.

      • Mark@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        22 days ago

        Yeah I should have said: I’m from the Netherlands as well. And my gripes are only valid here I think. The roads here are NOT made for these monster sized units. Parking one of them means you are half way parked on the curb, meaning pedestrians and wheel chairs can no longer pass.

        I’ve seen cases where these “parked units” block the flow of traffic and even trams!! #useless

    • shalafi@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      23 days ago

      Had a lot of those come through when I worked at Lowe’s. Many were indeed working trucks, but they were towing monster loads, not throwing shit in the back.

  • magnetosphere@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    23 days ago

    I’m amazed nobody has mentioned a confederate flag (or confederate anything) yet. My first assumption would be that they’re racist and proud of it.

  • Flickerby@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    22 days ago

    Really really long fake nails. Less judgement and more confusion I suppose. How do you do normal everyday activities?? I’m baffled

    • buggybug@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      22 days ago

      my sister wears these and i guess all i can say to your question is “very carefully.” she gets ones with cool designs on them so i guess i understand the hype, would never personally wear em tho. cant even stand normal nail polish on my nails cuz i get the urge to peel them off immediately :(

    • spicy pancake@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      21 days ago

      it takes getting used to for sure. it affects how you type, prepare meals, rummage around in bags, put in contact lenses and/or remove eyelashes/etc. from your eyes, and yes, how you hold the TP when you wipe.

      it’s a hobby and/or fashion statement, and like many of those it has tradeoffs lol. for me long nails was a job requirement (adult entertainment) that turned into a hobby (i learned to do my own because it eliminated salon costs, then found I enjoyed it artistically)