I think progressives never thought about this because we banked on immigration and demographic change allowing us to win culturally and electorally but the issue is immigrants tend to be overwhelmingly male, that is how Trump won actually he won over a lot of Hispanic,Black,Asian and indigenous men who feel humiliated by a new culture, economy and world.

So what can we do rhetorically and policy wise to win more young men over ?

  • percent@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 days ago

    I don’t have any big answers, but just a small piece of advice: Don’t shame people for asking questions when they just want to learn.

    I would think that’s the perfect opportunity to educate someone, but so many people will just down-vote a naive question and move on without explanation, which is even more confusing.

    I’m speaking from my own experience. I still tend to be neutral on a lot of things so far, but my brain is kinda… unusual. I think most people might gradually feel pushed away, “othered”, etc. and eventually lean in the opposite political direction than you might want.

    TL;DR: If you want people on your side, stop pushing them away. And maybe ask others on your side to stop too.

  • dukeofdummies@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 days ago

    What you’ve described is every complaint I’ve had with centrists and neocons in the democratic party. I don’t really know where the progressive part comes in.

    Bernie did amazing with men to the point where “bernie bros” were being mocked in media, so has Mamdani in NY in polls.

    If anything, I would argue that the Democratic party should be more populist and progressive. Focusing on things that pull up everybody, because everyone is struggling right now.

  • thedeadwalking4242@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 days ago

    Help them to break down. Encourage them to be soft and show them that that softness is strength. So many of these young men are like this because they feel alone. We need to bring them together in positive ways.

  • FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 days ago

    “Progressives” lost because they’re throwing all their weight behind a few big issues that are very disagreed with by the majority of the population - gender ideology, immigration, socialism/communism, at the top of that pile - and getting aggressive, instantly going to name calling and threatening violence, calling for censorship and “de-platforming”, and trying to get people fired and ruin the lives of at anyone who doesn’t blindly follow along.

    The blue collar workers? Dems don’t give a fuck about them. White people? Bend the knee to everyone and apologise constantly or get fucked. Men? Fuck everything about you unless you identify as a different gender or are in the country illegally.

    It’s really not surprising to anyone outside of the democrat bubble that calling half the country Nazis, bigots, and a half a dozen “phobes” is a bad idea. Also do you realise you’re just admitting to trying to “buy” election wins by essentially importing and bribing immigrants to vote Democrat? That’s another reason the democrats got annihilated.

    • spacecadet@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 days ago

      Also, after they lost they said anyone who didn’t vote for Kamala was a racist, sexist, nazi almost guaranteeing they will lose mid terms. I’ve moved from Dem to independent because it is clear Dems hate my existence more than they care about winning

      • AbsentBird@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 days ago

        It’s kinda hard to look at what’s currently happening in the US and not feel like every person who failed to vote against trump is a bit of an asshole. What a nightmare we all have to live through now.

        • spacecadet@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          8 days ago

          In your mind, what is happening that would cause someone who voted for Trump to be an ass hole, if the other candidate was calling them sexist and racist and an incel loser without even knowing them?

          • Feathercrown@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            8 days ago

            Project 2025, deportations with no due process, ignoring court orders, destroying all sense of confidentiality to foreign adversaries in the govt, cutting every govt program that politically disagrees with them, starting a useless war with Iran, appointing the worst possible people to his cabinet, pardoning J6 terrorists and calling for the jailing of the J6 committee, trying to fire every judge who disagrees with him, dismantling and wasting our foreign aid resources, not to mention countless counts of lying, cheating, raping, scamming, corruption, hate, etc. Literally name a thing and he’s done it. And this is just off the top of my head.

            • FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              edit-2
              8 days ago

              Project 2025 has nothing at all to do with trump or this admin lol. “No due process” only if you ignore all the due process they’ve already had.

              Did you just say that the USA started a war with Iran? Lol come on now.

              “Progressives” like you spreading “misinformation” and outright lies like you just did are one of the reasons why you lost almost the entire country.

            • spacecadet@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              8 days ago

              Never convicted of rape, said he doesn’t agree and won’t implement project 2025, he didn’t start a war with Iran, the people he is deporting are here illegally and violent criminals who have had due process, the Russia hoax was just that ie a hoax, both democrats and republicans constantly cut programs they disagree with once in power, that’s not a Trump thing, he pardoned J6 rioters that have not had due process after 4 years (you know the thing you complained about illegal immigrant violent criminals not getting), you’re a moron if you didn’t think USAID was a CIA slush fund, since you are so concerned about foreign wars, and you are an even bigger moron if you think Trump is the only politician that lies, they all do it frequently.

              Stop reading and giving into propaganda…

              • Feathercrown@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                8 days ago

                I’m not even going to properly respond to this, if I could convince you you’d already have seen the truth. Stop watching fox news. Blocked

        • FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          8 days ago

          The people making the USA a nightmare at the moment are the people that didn’t vote for trump. They’re the ones rioting, attacking people, looting nike stores, burning cars, etc - all because immigration laws are finally being enforced.

            • FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              8 days ago

              Straight to name calling and trying to censor people. Hmm, didn’t I just say something about the “progressives” jumping straight to that and it costing them dearly?

              Seems you still haven’t learned.

  • bent@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 days ago

    You need to make it fun and engaging for them. That is what the far right is doining. You and I might find it reprehensible, but they het som much traction bu having fun and giving young men a purpose and the feeling that they are doing something to netter themselves and their commuity.

    How you go about that I dont know. In my local area we are focusing on having fun partiets and going out together as a group instead of just being political nerds in our own little grottos. Som far it seems to be working.

    Tl;dr: Have fun visibly and invite them to join you. It takes forever, but at least you have fun while doing it.

  • Brkdncr@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 days ago

    Better marketing.

    Drop policies that have been consistent long-term losers like expanded gun control.

    Force through policies that improve their lives at the cost of others, for example, healthcare paid for by taxing billionaires

    • BombOmOm@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      9 days ago

      Drop policies that have been consistent long-term losers like expanded gun control.

      Suppressors are a hearing safety device/noise pollution reducer and Democrat politicians describe them like they get all their information from a John Wick movie. It would be so easy for the party to drop the matter entirely and throw politically-homeless gun owners a bone by taking suppressors off the NFA.

      Force through policies that improve their lives at the cost of others, for example, healthcare paid for by taxing billionaires

      Yep! Follow that up with policies that improve people’s lives and we have a ticket that writes itself.

  • ckmnstr@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 days ago

    A little out of the blue but I watched an episode of a German cooking show today where strangers are coupled in groups of five for a week and every day one of them has to cook for the rest of them. They then vote who was the best host.

    This week was ALL 30-38 year-old straight Dads. Nobody talked about football.

    Nobody chestbumped anyone. Nobody was mansplaning anything. Instead, they were all swooning over each others’ cooking skills, making each other cry over how much they love their kids and hugging each other for feeling insecure about their cooking. In other words it was the most realistic and “manly” portrayal of the male reality that I have seen in the media ever.

    It’s easy to blame the media and the “culture war” for male alienation but I strongly believe that our perception of ourselves is largely influenced by our peer group’s portrayal in society. In other words: if I feel antagonized, I tend to overreact. If I am being told by Hollywood or social media to “stop being a mansplaning patriarch” I will be imprinted with the very idea to identify as such.

    So long story short: non-toxic masculinity needs more representation AND it needs to come from a place of positivity, not judgement or condescension.

    • FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 days ago

      Instead, they were all swooning over each others’ cooking skills, making each other cry over how much they love their kids and hugging each other for feeling insecure about their cooking. In other words it was the most realistic and “manly” portrayal of the male reality that I have seen in the media ever.

      This is in no way a realistic or "manly " portrayal of the greater male reality.

    • LousyCornMuffins@lemmy.world
      cake
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 days ago

      what is this cooking show because it sounds delightful. statesians have lost the plot when it comes to cooking shows

      • ckmnstr@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 days ago

        It’s called “Das perfekte Dinner”, it’s been on the air for 20 years and is one of those shows that defies the death of classic television.

        It can appear quite boring if you come from watching things like chef’s table or hell’s kitchen, as there is little drama, its unscripted and it’s mostly very positive and no-nonsense.

  • agent_nycto@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 days ago

    Look at what men are missing and how the right is selling it to them.

    Men aren’t doing so hot right now, emotionally and mentally. They feel like they are not manly, and criticized for trying to be manly or liking manly things. There’s a lack of transitions into manhood, and the bar that is seen as a successful man with a good career is pretty much impossible.

    If you have a poor paying job, you’re not manly. If you have a well paying job but it’s blue collar you’re not manly because you’re a dumb working stiff. If you have a white collar job you’re not manly because you’re not doing anything tough with your body. Maybe if you’re a CEO who owns the company but also does rock climbing and bear fighting are you seen as manly enough, maybe.

    Then you have these guys, your Andrew Tates and so on, who act very manly and tell you it’s ok to be a man and then spout off some of the most toxic, asinine shit saying that’s how you be a man. And young guys fall for it because they aren’t shown any alternative.

    Then on the left you have people who speak ill of men as a whole, and manliness as a whole. Sometimes the criticisms are correct, but a lot of times it’s presented as men overall. If you try to say that it’s not every man out there who’s a monster, you get blasted with criticism for saying “not all men”. They also don’t provide anything positive or solutions for feeling manly, with the best they can be offered is to be more like women.

    So young men, especially young cishet men, are actively pushed away from leftist spaces, leaving them feeling demonized by those spaces, and actively pandered to by the right which are offering mind poison dressed up as solutions.

    So what do we do? There’s a few things to fix.

    1. leftist media has to stop demonizing men and start demonizing actions. Instead of saying “men are rapists” start saying “rapists are bad”. When people start to say things like “cis people are shit” other people need to call them out of it, because if you’re supposed to be the side that accepts people’s gender identity, it should be for all gender identities. It can feel cathartic to rail against the majority demographic, especially when people of that demographic have hurt you, but if you feel that it’s unfair to rail against a group because of the actions of a few members of it, that should apply to all groups. Things like “what’s wrong with the straights” doesn’t help build bonds with allies, and it turns young men away from leftist spaces.

    2. there needs to be validation and recognition from the left for problems men have, like suicide, workplace death and heavier prison sentencing. The left needs to show that they are trying to fix these problems, too, instead of telling young men to suck it up and be a man about it because they are the oppressor demographic.

    3. there needs to be people who counter toxic masculinity, not with telling men to be more like women, but with positive masculinity. If a man is having emotional or mental problems, toxic masculinity says to push that down. Femininity says it’s ok to be soft and vulnerable. Positive masculinity would say that a real man is true to himself and his feelings and expresses then freely, even if others might ridicule him for it. There’s a subtle difference, and the end result of femininity’s and positive masculinity’s tactic might be the same, i.e. the man expresses those feelings, but the way that they get there is very different. The former makes the man feel less validated in his identity, while the latter uplifts it. The memes where they say stuff like “I always tell my homies I love them before they go to bed” actually work.

    4. leftist influencers need to make fighting for the rights of minorities seem manly. Badass. Like a hero. Worthy of praise and celebration.

    5. while they won’t get the financial and political backing that the toxic male influencers get, there needs to be positive male influencers who talk about masculinity in a positive way, while promoting the ideas above. There needs to be an alternative, who acts manly but in the fun, positive way, that validates young men’s feelings of inadequacy, frustration, and isolation, while promoting an egalitarian perspective.

    6. there needs to be a cultural shift in what makes a man. A shift away from dying in battle or becoming a tycoon, and a resurgence of the working class hero. Mass media itself needs to change and promote positive male figures. It can work and be popular, like in Avatar the Last Airbender. We need to show men that they are still men, and still worthy of love, respect and adoration, even if they aren’t a super soldier or a wealthy elite. A lot of this is counter to capitalistic goals, so it may have to be subversive, but eventually it needs to be made the norm.

    7. other men need to continue to step up and speak out about injustice towards minorities and against toxic masculinity behaviors in the day to day, and start decrying those behaviors as unmanly. People need to call Andrew Tate and the like unmanly.

    8. ideally, the men’s rights movement should be absorbed by the left and the toxic incels kicked out. It should be done in the name of gender equality. Fixing only woman’s problems won’t solve the patriarchy (which could be changed to a different term so everyone feels like it’s less of an us vs them) and feminists should try to help solve men’s problems directly rather than indirectly. Young men would see feminism as more appealing if feminists actually focused on men’s problems as well, rather than ignoring or worse, demonizing them. Feminism could be rebranded as an egalitarian movement for all sexes and genders, maybe get a name change. If the patriarchy affects everyone, then the focus should be on everyone. Maybe it would have to be a whole new movement entirely.

    So it’s a larger problem than just getting more leftist male influencers, and some of those problems are systematic. Some can get worked on today. Talking about masculinity in a positive way, promotive equity, stop both their side and your side from bigotry, and, probably the thing that would get young men on board the most:

    Actually trying to solve the problems young men are going through.

    • rational_lib@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 days ago

      I get that this is upvoted a lot due to being constructive but it also reflects a lot of Republican media tropes about the left that aren’t really true - and that’s why trying to “fix” these things won’t work - because it misses the real problem.

      Examples: No significant figure on the left is saying “men are rapists”, or telling men to be more like women, etc. Reducing suicide, safer workplaces, and reducing excessive prison sentences are all priorities for the left and not for the right.

      I think the real problem is quite simple: Republicans have invested heavily in portraying themselves as the “masculine party”, and in driving the narratives I’ve mentioned. And because Republican leaders like the Murdochs and Elon tend to be men, they’re best at driving those narratives.

      Which goes to the real underlying problem with the left as a whole - no ability to drive or counter a media narrative. The right has Fox news and Elon’s control over Twitter, which they can and do regularly use to create whatever narrative they want. Notice how for example they just made white south African farmer killings a topic all of a sudden. The left has a bunch of corporate media whose top priority is selling truck ads. Sure, maybe the reporters themselves are left leaning, but they have no top down guidance as to what narratives to build.

      And until the left creates some sort of media capability to create and control narratives, the right will always have a leg up. And because of that, none of the well intentioned ideas here will actually work. If the left tries to appeal to men, the right will decide how those appeals will be interpreted.

      • agent_nycto@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 days ago

        I agree with you for the most part, but there is a thread you missed.

        While there might not be a significant leftist media personality which says misandrist things, there are a lot of smaller people who do. There’s an air of “men are not welcome here, specifically cishet men” in lefty spaces. And people who try to speak out against it tend to be ousted. (Case study Erin Pizzey) There wouldn’t be a demand for “male tears” mugs out there if there wasn’t a demand for them.

        Whether you think this behavior is acceptable or not, it doesn’t make the left seem appealing to young men, especially because it’s not called out by people.

        But yeah, the top down media? A huge machine that’s a problem. The left will have a hard time replicating it, especially because when you live in hyper capitalism, it’s not really in the benefit of capitalists to try to fix it.

    • Zonetrooper@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      9 days ago

      W-Wait, what is this? A well-thought out, constructive, sympathetic comment? Here? I don’t believe it!

      Real talk, though: This is an incredibly solid post and I really appreciate you taking the time to actually write all of these points out. It’s rare (or, subjectively, it feels rare) to see an admission that a major shift in how this topic is approached is needed, and I feel just a bit more hopeful seeing someone else put in the time to go this deep on it.

      I would only make two add-on comments to your points:

      • With regard to point #6, I agree with the concept - but we have to be careful of how we phrase this. Unless it comes with a major effort to utterly restructure our economy in such a way that either a man’s value is no longer measured in his ability to be successful in a paid position, and/or we restructure our economy to make success more viable, I fear that efforts to support “working class heros” are doomed to become awkward failures as automation continues to steamroll the viability of those positions.

      • One point I don’t see brought up here, though it is touched at in (1) and (8), is that we’ve got to modulate how we discuss so-called “toxic” behavior. When so many seemingly minor behaviors are met with the same levels of disdain, villainization, and even punishment as things like actual sexual assault, it ends up feeling deeply isolating, undermines the point that is trying to be made, and pushes men towards the worst actors.

      • Lv_InSaNe_vL@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 days ago

        For #6, I don’t think we necessarily have to move away from the idea that being a man means being a provider and a protector. At least to me those are some of the core tenants of being a man.

        The person above you mentioned the men in Avatar the last Airbender. But I also want to add in the men in LOTR, Gomez Adams, Ted Lasso, Kratos in the newer god of war games, and Steve Rodgers.

        These are men who are caring, loving, emotional and they are (mostly) able to show those emotions, capable of growth, and able to admit when they are wrong. But they are still men. Men who struggle with anger, men go to war and protect their families, men who are incredibly strong in the face of struggle, men who sometimes make “inappropriate” (to the left) jokes, and men who strive for nothing else but bettering the lives of those in their care.

        I sometimes hate that what counts as “positive masculinity” is really just feminity but dressed up in a blue bow. Men are not women and telling them that they can’t be super competitive, can’t be angry, and can’t fail is just setting them up to fall into toxic masculinity. This might just be me talking about the culture I was raised in but those things aren’t necessarily a bad thing, and erasing what a “man” has been for generations isn’t going to win you any extra fans.

        • Zonetrooper@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          8 days ago

          Sorry, I think maybe my point was misunderstood. Trust me, I’m in full agreement with you: Like the comment I was responding to was saying, trying to simply frame “positive” masculinity in terms of feminine traits doesn’t seem like a good idea. There needs to be a positive reference for actually masculine role models and ideals.

          Like, literally everything you said is something I totally agree with.

          My concern is that, specifically, initiatives which idealize working-class providers and fail to recognize the way automation and computerization have significantly flattened the jobs market (especially well-paying, working-class jobs), are intrinsically doomed because we don’t have an economy which widely supports men acting as supporters for a family. If we idealize a working provider but simultaneously leave things in a state where a man can’t provide for his family, what I fear we’re actually left with is swaths of men feeling unfulfilled and angry at those in charge for bringing them to this point.

      • agent_nycto@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 days ago

        Thanks, I’m glad you liked it!

        I kinda agree on your points. I feel that working class heros could make a comeback if done well, though.

        Hell ideally I’d like to see more historical stuff based on labor history, Blair Mountain was crazy and could totally be an action movie.

      • agent_nycto@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 days ago

        I don’t think that’s inherently true for all feminism, though there’s definitely been some bad actors. Actresses.

      • 0xD@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 days ago

        Wrong. Feminism is anti-patriarchy, for everyone. Educate yourself, read a little.

        • Captain Aggravated@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          8 days ago

          Being anti-patriarchy is an inherently anti-male stance. A feminist walks up to a man and says “We’re trying to erode your influence on society, isn’t that great?” Yeah, and what the natives need is Christianity.

          They’ll try to lie and market “The Patriarchy” as whatever they think they can get away with at the moment with the audience they’ve cornered, pretend like defeating “The Patriarchy” should be the goal of whoever they’re talking to as well. It shouldn’t.

          Feminism started out as things like the suffragettes, wanting the right to vote in elections. Fair enough. “We want to be equal to men!” Uh huh…so here in 2025 what right or privilege do I enjoy under the law that a woman doesn’t?

          I will also assert this: No feminist will be caught dead genuinely helping a man. A feminist is more likely to burn down a men’s shelter than build one.

          • 0xD@infosec.pub
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            8 days ago

            God damn, what a load of incel bullshit you’re spewing. You’re exactly the problem and the reason why women would rather spend time with a bear than another self-absorbed manlet.

            Patriarchy affects everyone badly, not just women. But I won’t be wasting time, you can learn about everything if you just put in a little effort. You seem to be choosing egoistical ignorance.

        • Feathercrown@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          8 days ago

          Feminism started as a way to fight for the rights of women. That’s not anti-male, but it’s also not “for everyone”.

          • 0xD@infosec.pub
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            8 days ago

            Of course the focus is on women and generally LGBTQ+ people, as they are oppressed groups.

            In its wider sense though, especially with the focus on intersectionality, it is for a fairer and juster world for everyone as the systems of oppression affect us all in various capacities.

            • Feathercrown@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              7 days ago

              I don’t know if I would categorize that as feminism though. Egalitarianism maybe? “Social justice” in the non-derogatory sense?

              • 0xD@infosec.pub
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                edit-2
                7 days ago

                Feminism is just a collective name for various ideologies with the aim of social justice for all genders/sexes. Within you will find many different movements with various qualities. In general, it’s about creating societal/governmental systems that afford the same quality of life and opportunities for everyone, regardless of gender, race or sexuality.

                You could see it as a subcategory of egalitarianism, which in general has the goal of social justice.

                https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Feminism

                In the end, of course not every movement is perfect, people are fallible after all. But that doesn’t only concern feminists even if they are one of the main targets of the manufactured right-wing culture war. And furthermore, some people going too far/not being nuanced enough/not going far enough is not a reason to disregard the movement and its wider aims in a fight for a better world for all.

    • Feathercrown@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      8 days ago

      You hit the nail on the head AND provided clear action items. Excellent post.

      I do think that it would be difficult to rebrand “feminism” and “patriarchy” because the terms are inherently gendered and are sometimes still being used for gendered purposes. We should definitely find new terms and be more accurate about the egalitarian movement being a new movement, or a rebrand of the more general parts of feminism, rather than trying to reuse the old movement’s terms when it doesn’t make sense.

    • ryathal@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 days ago

      This is a great solution but it has two big problems that make it functionally impossible.

      1. To the left there is no non-toxic or positive masculinity.
      2. Feminism doesn’t actually support men, it’s a reluctant talking point. It only helps men if it happens to coincide with benefiting women.
      • agent_nycto@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 days ago

        Depends on what part of the left you’re talking about, but yeah, these are things which have to change in order for it to work well.

    • Mac@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 days ago

      All these things already exist and maybe just need more exposure.

      • Feathercrown@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 days ago

        Most things already exist. What we need is for this to become the dominant understanding/goals of the left.

    • meyotch@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 days ago

      Thank you for taking the time to write that. That was very well thought out and I really can’t see much or anything to quibble about.

      I am a gay man raised in a conservative culture and I really know quite a lot of men in their 30s and 40s who are straight and accepting of me, but still deeply deeply troubled and confused about what it means to be a man. They struggle to identify and articulate their emotions quite a lot.

      The fact that those in same-sex relationships have to invent their own ways of dividing the work in a partnership without reference to pre-defined gender roles makes their insight incredibly useful to the world at large. A lot of the struggles that men experience are due to rigid gender roles that do not allow for healthy expression.

      I get a little bit angry because it’s like we were expected to accept that provisional approval from the Supreme Court, which as we all know is a very fragile victory.

      Why? Because frankly, I think gay men and lesbians have a lot to teach about relationships just by existing visibly. Transgender people do too, but they do not yet enjoy the patchy and tentative acceptance that same sex relationships between cis people have achieved in the large parts of the USA. Their struggle is very intense right now and the LGBQs can help by getting loud again.

      Why did we give up on the fight so early? The struggle for existence is not quite as dire for gay and lesbian people as it used to be, but it is still quite a struggle as nothing is assured. But it is not just for our benefit that we must be visible. Frankly, our experience gives us a great deal of wisdom and insight that our society, and men especially, desperately need.

      • agent_nycto@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 days ago

        l feel that the acceptance of LGBT people has actually had a beneficial effect on cishet men in ways most people aren’t aware of.

        Dating is a good example. Traditionally the guy asks the girl out and pays for everything. This system sucks. It means men feel desperate and have to prove their worth (financial and otherwise) feeling lonely and worthless and women are stuck with the constant stream of guys trying to hit on them, dealing with harassment and worse.

        But with more acceptance of homosexual relationships, that traditional method of dating doesn’t apply. The old “but who’s the guy” confusion goes away, and people as a whole realize that it’s stupid. If you see a post about a woman insisting a guy pays for everything or a guy insisting on ordering for his date they seem old fashioned and weirdly demanding. Most people wouldn’t bat an eye about a girl asking a guy out on a date now, and I’ll bet there’s some old newspaper headlines about some lady doing that in the past.

        By your nature you’re helping to break down these dysfunctional systems and it’s actually helping people, so thanks a lot for that!

    • Onyxonblack@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 days ago

      I want “manly-ness” to go extinct. Honestly I bet mods might delete my comment. But I feel the issue is we as a species are figuring out (slowly) that we all need to go extinct. Human brain architecture is fatally flawed. Greed and selfish notions, always striving for power, and the destruction of basically all other life in this planet, tells me we all need to simply accept that we are empherial, transient and temporary. Nothing is sacred, there is no gods or meaning. Ultimate Nihilism essentially. MISANTHROPIC ANTI-NATALISM. But also negative-utilarianism, which states that those who choose to stay living need to focus on reducing other people’s suffering. Honestly, it’s almost fascist itself, my beliefs. Here’s one: those who cause other people suffering should be executed! No tolerance for intolerance… start by burning all the churches down. Outlaw religion, the mind sickness. Only allow what can be proven scientifically. But yeah, basically we need to genocide the genociders… no forgiveness. Cull the conservatives. No more nations or governments. No patriotism or nationalism or exclusive cultures… above all though, we humans are garbage and we have poisoned the entire planet. We must go extinct. Never get off this planet! Kill any who try to leave, gotta contain the cancer!

  • blarghly@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 days ago

    Simple. What do young men care about? Getting laid and getting paid. Promise them that, and you’ll get their votes.

    You’ll need to use coded language, of course. But using coded language is politicians’ whole job.

  • CmdrShepard49@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    9 days ago

    I think instead of focusing on how to sell this product, we focus on the product itself because it’s impossible to sell something that Democrats keep pulling off the shelf as “defective.” Like any other item that people buy, committing to something only to have the “company” do a 180 and stop supporting it immediately after your “purchase” is just going to drive people away.

    Most Denocrats only seem interested in pushing progressive policies right up until they get elected and then it’s always “not the right time” after the election.

  • FeelzGoodMan420@eviltoast.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    9 days ago

    “Real men take care of their neighbors and vulnerable people, not just themselves and their family”? Honestly I have no fucking idea lol. Not sure that sounds catchy enough though in comparison to the incel bullshit that youtube clowns are feeding young boys these days.

      • supersquirrel@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 days ago

        Me too, but even if he wasn’t likable, he is good at rhetorically debating people on points of leftism in a way that I think is very productive for a lot of men to at least hear out.

        I hope.

        sigh

        • daggermoon@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          7 days ago

          I wish the left had more people like him, we’d be in a much better position. People like him should be leading the Democratic party rather than aging neo-liberals.

  • Beacon@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 days ago
    1. Stop dismissing that men have problems which require addressing

    A lot of people say things like “men have it the best, they don’t need help!” That’s nonsense. Everyone who is dealing with problems and is suffering needs help. Helping men doesn’t mean you stop helping women, we should help everyone who needs help.

    1. Stop purity tests and infighting

    Progressive today are truly awful when it comes to this. I’m not talking about including nazis, I’m talking about attacking people who agree with you on 90% of topics. Like if someone thinks trans people should be totally treated as the gender they express in every facet of society, except they shouldn’t be allowed to compete in women’s physical sports competitions.

    1. Messaging needs HUGE improvement

    This is another one that progressives have a terrible problem with. They do a terrible job of letting people know how they’re being helped, and they also use language that gives the impression that they’re against you. For example “the patriarchy” is a terrible term that makes men feel attacked, even though that’s not what it’s about at all. What most people actually mean to refer to is “gender norms”, meaning concepts like ‘men should fuck a lot of women and not express their emotions’. “Gender norms” is a much more accurate term and it doesn’t make men feel like they’re being attacked.

    • Initiateofthevoid@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      8 days ago

      Like if someone thinks trans people should be totally treated as the gender they express in every facet of society, except they shouldn’t be allowed to compete in women’s physical sports competitions.

      The problem here is that this is just the front lines of the attack on transgender people. This is a way of not treating them as the gender they express, and it won’t end there. It’s the goal post, and the goal posts will keep moving. The bathroom, the athletics, the healthcare - they’re all the same thing. A coordinated assault. Nobody cared about transgender athletes until it was used as a wedge issue and as yet another way to box transgender people out of society.

      I agree that we need to stop the infighting, but I disagree that it involves giving ground in the assault on oppressed minorities. If it’s a genuine problem, we can circle back and discuss our athletics in a civil society where these people aren’t actively under attack. But as it stands, any law written about this right now isn’t being written in the pursuit of fairness, it’s being written as a weapon of oppression.

      We have more important things to be doing, and that means fighting this assault with exactly what you describe - better messaging.

      Do exactly what the conservative front does. Use these wedge issues as a way to fight the bigger fight. Keep the messaging on point.

      • They claim they’re looking out for your children, while they’re stealing your children’s lunch money.
      • They claim they’re protecting students, but they’re stealing the salaries of our teachers, they’re taking the supplies out of our classrooms.
      • Literacy and math skills are declining, and the education system is crumbling more with each new tax break for the rich, all while they’re wasting time and money on interfering with soccer games.
      • Transgender students and athletes make up a fraction of a percent of our schools and teams, but Republicans spend half their time worrying about this while all children are losing out on critical after school activities and athletics programs that will keep them happy, healthy, and on track for the bright future they all deserve.
      • psivchaz@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 days ago

        I get what you’re saying, but every rights movement has worked the opposite way. It’s not about giving up ground, it’s about picking one battle at a time. Gay people fought to be not killed, then fought to be accepted, then fought to be able to marry. It wasn’t a single “equality” battle, it was a series of battles in a longer war. They didn’t slide back immediately when they couldn’t get married, they fought the next fight.

        Some people really suck, but for a lot I think it’s more misunderstanding or reluctance to let things change. There’s many reasons. Labeling everyone who doesn’t get on board with every facet of what you want means you’re reducing your allies. And those people who are comfortable with one thing but uncomfortable with another may become more comfortable when they see that the first thing doesn’t lead to the collapse of society.

        • Initiateofthevoid@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          8 days ago

          I’ll be honest, I don’t get what you’re saying about rights movements. Every single rights movement has been nothing but an uphill battle for acceptance, and no rights movement has ever benefitted from saying “okay, you can hold onto this right for now, as a treat.”

          I’m not labelling anyone anything. I’m saying that there’s more important things to deal with right now. You don’t need to get on board with transgender athletes - you just need to stay focused on the real problems. If you support them, great. Defend them.

          If you don’t support them, fine, but you need to attack the very idea that the national conversation has anything to do with transgender athletes. It doesn’t.

          The fascists in charge don’t give a shit about the issue, it’s just a weapon in their arsenal, and a means of distracting you from the real problems. Every moment someone says “actually that’s a good point, let’s talk about sports” is another moment wasted. None of it is about sports. It’s about a rising wave of fascism that needs to be stopped at all costs.

          • psivchaz@reddthat.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            7 days ago

            I think I misunderstood what you were originally saying and we’re more or less on the same side. My point was that it’s not about saying “okay we’ll stop caring about this” but about saying “this isn’t the thing we need to be focusing attention on right now.” I worded it very poorly.

      • Feathercrown@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 days ago

        That’s probably the right strategy. I think there is room for academic discussion of how trans sports should be handled, but we spend too much time talking about that and aren’t saying enough of importance for me to believe that the discussion is currently effective.

        • Initiateofthevoid@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          8 days ago

          Absolutely. The most important thing is that it’s not urgent. People are dying. Education is failing. Healthcare, research, science, they’re all under attack.

          The economy is plummeting into uncertainty, the cost of living continues to rise, and people are underpaid, overworked, and struggling to make ends meet while the corporate-backed media writes headlines like “economy is doing well, <cherry-picked numbers> are slightly up this quarter!”

          They’re threatening war, they’re shredding the constitution, they’re tearing away human rights.

          What is the outcome of a soccer game, against all that? What is the value of a trophy, against the value of human lives? Why are we worried about the “fairness” of a game, when a technological golden age meets a society in decline?

          • Feathercrown@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            8 days ago

            What is the outcome of a soccer game, against all that? What is the value of a trophy, against the value of human lives? Why are we worried about the “fairness” of a game, when a technological golden age meets a society in decline?