• The Menemen!@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    I hate tiktok. I am not from the US, but banning the app that is most popular among young people while raiding dozens of university campuses? Don’t sound like a great way to get young people trust the system…

    • Nom Nom@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      They don’t really aim for them either, it’s not like most young people would go lobby them in their preferred way(money).

    • whoreticulture@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      My tiktok feed was filled with videos from the protests, and has been filled w info on Palestine for the past half a year. I don’t think this ban is a coincidence. Tiktok always has the fastest transmission of information from people on the scenes, kinda like Twitter back in the day.

  • AutoTL;DR@lemmings.worldB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 months ago

    This is the best summary I could come up with:


    TikTok CEO Shou Chew has issued a rallying cry to users that the company plans to fight a possible US ban.

    A foreign-aid bill passed Tuesday by the US Senate and signed by President Joe Biden Wednesday has millions of Americans who use TikTok freaking out over a potential ban.

    The clip has over four million views as of Wednesday afternoon, and the comments show that users aren’t ready to say goodbye to TikTok anytime soon.

    Many expressed support for Chew, whose call to action hints at the pressure building against TikTok and its Chinese owners, Bytedance.

    Others credited the platform for helping users find “their voice and livelihood” and providing “a sense of community here that we don’t have anywhere else.”

    Despite Chew’s defiant video and the growing outrage from the app’s users, a TikTok ban won’t happen in the immediate future.


    The original article contains 261 words, the summary contains 143 words. Saved 45%. I’m a bot and I’m open source!

  • Jeena@jemmy.jeena.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 months ago

    If they had the best of the users in mind they would try to sell it. But if I was the CCP I would do everything so they couldn’t sell it. Then you’d have a martyr which you could always point to that the US is also blocking, so blocking can’t be so bad.

    I don’t see what the CCP would get out of selling it.

    • natural_motions@lemmynsfw.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      It’s kind of revealing really, the CCP clearly doesn’t want this app operating in the US simply to make money otherwise they’d simply sell and move on.

      Hopefully users will be able to put 2+2 together themselves once the withdrawal starts to fade.

  • anti-idpol action@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 months ago

    us be please please stop spying on our children so that WE can do that and also prevent the thoughtcrime of believing genocide (in Palestine) is bad

      • mightyfoolish@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 months ago

        Government did not care what happened on Tiktok during the KIA nonsense. Tiktok is now more controlled and cleaned up and became a new source for young people. Now the government wants to ban it. It is much better than before and the whole time it was Chines owned. So now, you have to argue against two points.

        1. It was OK Asian people owned it before. Why not now?
        2. The content is moderated now and adults no longer complain it’s worse than Instagram, Twitter, or the racist cesspool of a comment section that is Youtube.
        • ParetoOptimalDev@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          6 months ago

          You can be critical of the CCP but also see the increased urgency in “fixing tiktok” after US/Israel propaganda to hide Palestine genocide got stymied by tiktok.

    • sunbeam60@lemmy.one
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      But you do realise there’s a difference between a business owning some data about its users in a well regulated democracy and the Chinese state having free access to a tonne of personal data about a vast amount of people in the West?

      Also, I presume you are aware that China prohibits the export of data on Chinese citizens to western servers.

      While it’s not exactly important who started it, China started it.

  • Dempf@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 months ago

    Now that it’s happening, I don’t quite know how to feel.

    I certainly don’t feel sorry for Tiktok though.

  • Wild_Mastic@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    Users are freaking out

    Oh noo how will I manage without my daily cringe worthy bullshit videos mixed with ads

    • yamanii@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      You are right, they should ban lemmy too since it’s used for propaganda by anticapitalists! /s

    • OneWomanCreamTeam@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      For real.

      Like a dozen social media apps already have reals or shorts or some shit that’s basically tiktok. They’re all shitty and invasive, but so is tiktok.

    • unphazed@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      I actually get pretty good info from TT. Lawyer insight on Trump trials, video quotes from politicians, summaries of new laws, science summaries for dummies that don’t have physics degrees, etc.

    • surewhynotlem@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      You either never used Tiktok, or you spent too much time staring at the shit videos and that ended up as your feed.

      Personally, I get gardening tips, legal analysis of the trump trials, and stand up comedy. It’s great.

      • Eldritch@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 months ago

        I get that on YouTube. (Legal Eagle, Leja etc) Just a bit less CCP manipulation. Not that there aren’t issues with YouTube. Just less than TicTok.

        • surewhynotlem@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          6 months ago

          I have trouble with YouTube. It never recommends good short form content. If I could crack that, I probably wouldn’t Tiktok.

          • AutistoMephisto@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            6 months ago

            This, basically. Google took YouTube and made its algorithm push more long form content for the purpose of generating revenue from ads. Not saying TikTok doesn’t have ads in my feed but at least I can skip literally all of them.

          • Eldritch@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            6 months ago

            That’s probably fair enough. I don’t watch shorts on any site anywhere. I tend to opt for the 20 minute 30 minute or longer videos. Sitting and working on things when I get home.

          • Eldritch@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            6 months ago

            I concede. Can’t argue with facts like that. You’d have to be brainwashed to want to be spied on by one less entity. Oh wait my mistake. You have no facts. You’re just expressing a baseless useless opinion that isn’t worth shit. Have a nice day :-)

            • whoreticulture@lemmy.blahaj.zone
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              edit-2
              6 months ago

              Hm funny how the government isn’t banning spying, but is asking for foreign companies to be sold? It’s okay when Facebook does it.

              also lmao at this “I concede” comment bro not everything is a debate

              • Eldritch@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                edit-2
                6 months ago

                Funnily enough. If you weren’t jumping to conclusions about things not being said. I actually agree with you on that. I think it’s hypocritical that the government is doing this. I’m still allowed and have good reason to dislike tiktoc more.

                You’re welcome to go look at my post history from the last few days. I’ve made the exact argument that it is hypocritical. And believe me I’d rather move off to something like peer tube entirely. But there’s logistics still needing to be addressed before that. And currently we’re largely stuck in a few inescapabe duopolies. Least worst of two inadequate choices. And yes YouTube wins that technically by being mildly less manipulative. Not by much. Believe me I know how much their algorithm stirs the pot trying to get engagement.

                And yes I know it’s not a debate. That was specifically why I said that. To point out that it wasn’t a debate that there were no accusations of fact or anything being discussed there. You were simply jumping to a conclusion that was unsupported.

          • vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            6 months ago

            I just want to not see them. I dont watch shorts and I never will. Youtube can go fuck itself because I fucking refuse to watch anything in fucking portrait mode let alone narrowed down in timescale to roughly fuck all.

      • Wild_Mastic@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 months ago

        I only saw some videos on other’s phones.

        Also I started using newpipe for youtube exactly because I don’t want an algorithm learning what I’m interested in. No way in hell I do it for tiktok.

    • Killing_Spark@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      I loathe tiktok but if someone had banned Reddit while I was still using it I would have been hella mad. On the other hand it would have been “How will I manage without unhinged shitposts mixed with ads” from the outside

    • cyd@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      I mean, you can use that approach to denigrate pretty much any activity people spend time on.

    • FreeFacts@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      I think it’s ironic this is posted here on Lemmy, which is what it is today mainly thanks to users of another service freaking out over how they will manage without their API access to bullshit aggregated content mixed with astroturfing.

      • SupraMario@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 months ago

        Most of the people who used the 3rd party apps weren’t people who just doom scrolled shit that was fed to them. Most of them had all the default shit blocked or unsubed. It was all niche stuff the majority was subed to that had very little ad revenue for reddit. It’s why the protests didn’t really work, reddit didn’t give a shit about the million or so people who went with niche subs using 3rd party apps.

          • Almrond@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            6 months ago

            Hi, I contribute to a number of projects that require incredibly specific information to facilitate (GPGPU kernel optimizations and unit tests for BLAS) and I use Reddit to collaborate with other engineers to solve issues like doing calculus on Lie groups resulting in a divide by zero because some non-zero groups multiply to zero in the middle of the calculation. The best engineers and mathematicians I know moved here, so I moved with them to continue the dissemination of these principles. The majority of memes and shitposts offer a common forum to get real work and study done in a way that publicly offers those solutions to anyone asking the same questions. Reddit wants just the shitposts and astroturfing, so they can keep it. I have work to do.

      • TheFriar@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 months ago

        Reddit and TikTok are incredibly different. And most of us that came over here from Reddit were there and we all saw the quality of Reddit going downhill for a long time. And when Reddit decided to try to be more like a TikTok style company, we all bailed.

        So it’s not that ironic. We all willingly left when a company made one more decision screwing us over. These people are clawing at their phones to stay on an app.

    • BananaTrifleViolin@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      6 months ago

      Either TikTok will win in court and overturn the law (possible), be sold (unlikely) or shut down (likely). I can’t see TikTok being sold being allowed by China, and even selling part of the business just creates a new global competitor to extend out of the US.

      Multiple competitors will appear in the meantime hoping to get the displaced activity. TikTok is hugely profitable and a dominant replacement in the US would make a lot of money. This will be seen as an opportunity to make a lot of money for the winner.

      I can see Meta trying to make a TikTok like clone, Google trying to leverage YouTube shorts, and Elon Musk trying to revive Vine at Twitter, plus lots of startups (mostly. American but possibly from other nations) vying to win the audience.

      Ironically the more interesting battle may be outside the US - TikTok versus whatever US app comes along.

      The deadline is after the US election - this could also all be political grandstanding and the politicians expectation might be that the law won’t stand up in court anyway.

      • Match!!@pawb.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 months ago

        TikTok has hundreds of millions of users outside the US, they may just pull out [and then US users will VPN to use it like we’re fucking Iran]

          • Buttons@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            6 months ago

            All the public will have to do is type “tiktok.com” in their browser and their computer will connect to directly to servers in China. For now, they don’t even need a VPN.

            Then our politicians will start discussing a national firewall. We’ll show that we’re better than China by doing the same things China would do (/s).

          • Woozythebear@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            6 months ago

            If you can use tik tok you can use a VPN. I click my VPN to start it and it auto connects. You think tapping 1 button on your phone is too hard for people who tap one button on their phone to open tik tok?

          • Dran@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            6 months ago

            unless the bill has changed since the last time I read it, there were fines for hosting the service in US datacenters, and fines for companies allowing US data to exist in non-us datacenters. I don’t think you could interpret the bill as imposing a civil penalty to a user using a vpn and accessing it.

            • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              6 months ago

              Exactly. I read Division H of the bill (the more important to me), and civilians would only be impacted if they distribute a banned app or something. ISPs could potentially be culpable though, but I’m pretty sure that’s related to hosting the infra for something like TikTok and not just allowing traffic to it.

              So yeah, using a VPN with TikTok would totally work. Not sure if you could get updates to the app over VPN though, that depends on how the stores handle regions.

              • Dran@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                6 months ago

                Not sure if you could get updates to the app over VPN though, that depends on how the stores handle regions.

                Specifically, app stores would be required not to host it, so you’d likely have to do updates through some sort of side-loading

                • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  6 months ago

                  I’m saying if you’re reporting your location as the EU, could you get updates through the App Store? Or would it know you’re a US customer and disallow it, even if you report that you’re in the EU? Or does it use GPS location?

    • Woozythebear@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      If they banned lemmy and reddit you would be freaking out too. The difference is many people run their businesses on tik tok. Your making fun of people who are losing their livelihood.

        • mightyfoolish@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          6 months ago

          They provide a shop front interface called TikTok Shop. It’s something Meta has been wanting to do for awhile in WhatsApp.

        • Woozythebear@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          6 months ago

          You use it to advertise and show off your items without having a actual shop. Tik Tok also has a shop you can buy from and you can list your items on there.

          The closest thing I can think of that’s similar to it would be Etsy but instead of having just pics of your products you can have short videos of it.

      • Stovetop@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 months ago

        I would love it if the government banned Reddit.

        Lemmy I could live without. If any users are making their livelihoods on Lemmy or Reddit, they should find something more productive to do.

        • stembolts@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          6 months ago

          I would love it if the government banned Reddit.

          Lemmy I could live without. If any users are making their livelihoods on Lemmy or Reddit, they should find something more productive to do.

          by Stovetop@lemmy.world

          I nominate this for the least aware comment on lemmy. We truly have a gem here. “If someone is making their living in a way I don’t understand, they should get a real job. After all, it doesn’t affect me, so it must be fine.”

          Truly well-spoken, just look at all of the many high-paying jobs available to people of all skill levels, I mean, it’s not enough that an entire generation needs to hustle and convert every waking moment into opportunities to generate capital in order to barely survive… but also please do it in a way that Stovetop understands and supports. Otherwise, it’s not “productive”, whatever high-minded values that meaningless phrase is supposed to represent. Clueless.

          Null empathy, null emotional intelligence, null consideration. Truly a masterpiece.

          Stovetop please stay the way you are, we want to study you.

          • Stovetop@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            6 months ago

            What sort of living do you think users are eking out on Reddit or Lemmy?

            Social media commerce is all scams and influencers. There are much more productive things people could do to contribute to the betterment of society without trying to capitalize the brain space of gullible and vulnerable people.

            • stembolts@programming.dev
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              edit-2
              6 months ago

              That is a good question.

              The world of late stage capitalism. When “scammer” starts to become a common profession… perhaps instead of asking why everyone is becoming a scammer, ask what type of system rewards and necessistates it, and why?

              There are hints in this discussion to what is wrong with the world we inhabit that leads people down this path, and that is the picture I want to draw for you.

              In short, people are extremely desperate. Some might think this is just how things are, but I happen to be one of the people who thinks it is by design. The richest want to keep the workers hungry, afraid, lacking security, and the house (in which they have financial stake in) can rake in the gains. The intentional applied divisiveness of capitalism.

              In that context, I wanted to point out the privileged life that you likely live in order to not realize the desperation that drives someone to capitalize on every financial opportunity available, even the crazy ones. My statement isn’t in favor of making revenue on X, Y, or Z platform, my statement is in critique over your critique of how others earn a living, as well as your disregard for their situation. I was urging you to walk a mental mile in someone else’s shoes.

              Also I apologize for mocking you, it’s not personal but I couldn’t resist taking the piss out of your comment.

            • OneWomanCreamTeam@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              6 months ago

              I mean, people probably aren’t making a living on Reddit or Lemmy, but those aren’t actually getting banned. Tiktok is, and people are actually making a living off of tiktok.

        • Woozythebear@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          6 months ago

          More productive? Dog they are small businesses that are using tik tok as a store front. Like how people run business through Facebook. What your saying is “fuck these people they should just go work a soul crushing job at a big corporation like me”

            • Codilingus@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              6 months ago

              There are non-scam companies on TikTok. I don’t use it but it’s easy enough to see. People use it to hustle their marketing and advertising, some people even hire to fill that role.

              First example that comes to mind is from years ago, but a dude started and grew a business in Miami for selling exotic fruits that are unique to Florida to anyone online. Something like $100 for a seasonal, shipped overnight, cooler of exotic fruits with info/instructions. He got a girlfriend and she made their popularity explode using TikTok. The best way I can describe her videos is making it seem like you’re bougie if you subscribe to their seasonal boxes monthly.

              Whatever she did worked though. Not a scam, you pay and get the fruit.

      • Eldritch@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 months ago

        Nah. Lemmy is a software. Reddit is an entity. They could try to ban specific Lemmy servers. They’ve tried to go after torrent tracker sites with little to no success. This wouldn’t be any different.

        I think it’s illuminating and hilarious that they’re actually going through with this though. I’ve long made the statement that capitalists and Leninist are kissing cousins on all the worst possible fronts. And here’s another data point.

          • Eldritch@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            6 months ago

            There’s what they claim to be and what they are. What they claim to be, is a transitional centralized system of government aimed at jump starting communism. What they are is that without a mechanism or plan to transition. Ending up in EVERY SINGLE GROUP that has tried devolving into an authoritarian suppressive system. Benefitting largely those at the top.

            The Party heads in Moscow benefited far more than the average citizen of the Soviet Union. Nearly every modern Russian oligarch has a direct line that can be drawn back to former party leadership. Xi Jinping does not live in government block housing like a regular citizen. Nor do any of the families of top party members. And should a Chinese citizen complain. They will be brutally ostracized and excluded from society at best. Jailed for life or slaughtered if they’re not so lucky. Capitalists salivate about being able to do that with impunity. They still do it. Just not with impunity yet.

      • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 months ago

        Well, I’m freaking out a bit despite hating TikTok and believing it’s harmful to the average user. I don’t believe in censorship, and I think banning an app like this is a form of censorship.

        That said, even if Lemmy and Reddit were banned, I would probably react similarly. I don’t need Reddit or Lemmy and can do without, but I disagree very much with the censorship.

  • RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    Find your voice?

    Ah, the only time you’re going to hear that from the Chinese company is when they want you to prevent someone coming between them and their data feed and profits.

    Nevermind the algorithms that suppress voices they don’t want to be heard.

    • GladiusB@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      And the fact that “their own voice” is banned in China itself. What a bunch of bullshit.

  • NutWrench@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 months ago

    Given how easy it is to create shell corporations, how does any of this prevent the CCP from running TikTok through another proxy?

    I.e. is all this posturing just a colossal waste of time?

    • Buttons@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      I’ve been wondering the same.

      What prevents a few US Citizens from forming a totally new and independent company called BitDance and then ByteDance sells them TikTok for $3.99, and then BitDance hires a company from China to help consult on the algorithms they use.

  • 800XL@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 months ago

    There are a million startups chomping at the bit to create or have their existing app become the TikTok replacement in the event it does get banned.

    This is the nature of American Capitalism. A monopolistic entity is broken up for this reason or that thereby making way for competition. According to all those economists, competition is good and breeds innovation.

    I don’t have a problem with this. Next go for Google, Meta, Apple, and Microsoft too.

    • moon@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      This isn’t an anti-trust case, it’s just anti-China posturing and lobbying from Meta and friends bearing fruit. Google and Meta will fight for the users and their monopolies will grow even more menacingly bloated

      • sunbeam60@lemmy.one
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 months ago

        Well, before you declare anti-China posturing, have you considered how China treats Western social media companies? They are completely banned.

        • moon@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          6 months ago

          China takes a protectionist stance towards many industries, whereas the US claims, not entirely correctly, to be a bastion of free trade. I’m not sure US citizens want their government taking cues from the CCP either

            • Eldritch@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              6 months ago

              Perhaps, but not when you’re supposed to be the bastion of free speech. And while there is the aspect of this being about domestic neerdowells not getting their beaks wet. There’s plenty speech suppression involved as well. I think the stunt ticktok pulled in this case backfired spectacularly. It had been lurking in the background for a while. But it seems they felt urgency after that.

              I’d still have a problem with this even if they shut down sites like stormfront as well. But at least that would be consistently wrong. Not hypocritically wrong.

    • Encrypt-Keeper@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      I mean in all honesty if another app takes over TikTok it’ll just be Instagram reels. It’s already got a lot of cross-buy-in.

  • KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 months ago

    my master plan, of laughing at people when the government overstepping is complete is FINALLY coming to fruition.

    /s for those who haven’t already discovered it.

  • Audacious@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 months ago

    I think the tiktok fiasco is just another wrong solution to a problem. The problem is data collection and mismanagement of it; and no one is getting ‘royalties’ for their data being sold or used.

    • chiliedogg@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      They aren’t attempting to solve a problem. The political right wants to buy TikTok to control a space used by millions of young voters.

  • umbrella@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 months ago

    they already said they will ceasoboperations in the us if they can’t fight this off in court

  • Melllvar@startrek.website
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 months ago

    Chew responded to the latest moves in a video posted by the official TikTok account. “Make no mistake, this is a ban,” Chew said in the video. “A ban on TikTok and a ban on you and your voice.”

    Narrator: it wasn’t.

      • Melllvar@startrek.website
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 months ago

        I’ve actually read the law, so no one has to tell me that it really, actually is about privacy. I know that it is.

        • PhAzE@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          6 months ago

          Lemmy users are just going to believe whatever they want to believe, instead of actually checking the facts.

          It’s 100% about privacy. Data collection, and algorithm manipulation to sway what users see in the interest of the Cinese government. If users think Russian interference is a problem, we’ll this amounts to the same thing.

          • RecluseRamble@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            6 months ago

            the Cinese government

            So it’s about foreign policy and not privacy. Or does the law somehow affect Facebook products too which are the same crap from an individual privacy perspective?

            • PhAzE@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              6 months ago

              Again, it’s not about data being collected. It is about the algorithm that let’s them control what users see in their feeds.

        • TheHarpyEagle@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          6 months ago

          If it was actually about privacy then the US would be introducing data transparency and control laws (which only kicks in here if TikTok doesn’t sell to a US company). Whether it’s the US wanting to stream their own bullshit to kids or just that sweet sweet ad revenue, this is in no way about privacy or “protecting the children”.

            • TheHarpyEagle@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              edit-2
              6 months ago

              How so? If you’re concerned about propaganda, require every company operating within the US to show users exactly what data is collected and allow them to delete any or all of it as desired. Show users to the technical extent possible what data has connected them to suggested videos or ads. Put the power of users’ hands to understand and control how they are targeted.

              • Melllvar@startrek.website
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                edit-2
                6 months ago

                require every company operating within the US to show users exactly what data is collected and allow them to delete any or all of it as desired

                That would be a very different kind of law from the one we’re talking about.

        • hark@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          6 months ago

          It’s about privacy in the same way “protect the children” bills are about protecting the children.

          Narrator: it’s not.

  • TypicalHog@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 months ago

    I’m not for banning shit. I am for educating. We need to show people what TikTok really is, what it does and how it affects shit.

    • Alien Nathan Edward@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      The problem, from the government’s perspective, is that there’s no way to only see some of the fnords. If we teach people to recognize Chinese propaganda, they’ll start to recognize American propaganda too. Better to keep us stupid and then control who’s allowed to talk to us in the first place.

    • MehBlah@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      You can lead a horse to water but you can’t make them drink. Many lack the complexity of thought to understand they are being played like fiddles.

    • Squizzy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      Ah fuck it, its just the next step the US is just mad China got this privacy invader and not them. Meanwhile Meta is the internet to most of Africa.

      All major social medias have been toxic and invasive and only now does it matter to the US.

      • Cethin@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 months ago

        It’s not about privacy. China and the US have all the data on you they could want. It’s about control. TikTok has successfully activated their base to contact their representatives with a notification from the app. It shows that they could use it to influence our politics.

        China recognizes the danger, hence all western apps being banned. If they recognize the danger, then they must also recognize the utility. Are they using it? It’s hard to say, but TikTok is what that would look like.

        • hark@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          6 months ago

          You mean like how rideshare apps told their users to vote in specific ways on specific ballot proposals? No talk about banning those apps.

          • Cethin@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            6 months ago

            Sure, but as far as I’m aware they’re American companies. Americans are allowed to influence our elections. Foreign agents are not. Whether they’re doing it on behalf of China or not, they’re foreign agents with a lot of political power, and have been shown to use it for their own self interest.

            • hark@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              6 months ago

              Billionaires might as well be considered foreign agents. They’re parasites who are doing a lot more damage to the country than any actual foreign agent has ever managed.