• NotSteve_@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 day ago

        Okay, then advocating for better urban planning and less urban sprawl. Unless you live in a rural area, you shouldn’t be required to go into debt to pay for a multi ton machine to be able to buy food. It’s odd that only in the last hundred years humans have stopped being able to function day to day without vehicles.

        • credo@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 day ago

          You all talk a big game, but I’ve been to about 20 countries so far in my life. Distributed all over the world. They ALL have traffic led by cars. I guess I haven’t been to Mumbai…

          Your assumptions are wrong, and you live in fantasy. Get over it.

          • NotSteve_@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            24 hours ago

            I’m not sure what your point is? I never said cars weren’t leading traffic. I think we’ve both kind of lost the plot here but my point was that cars aren’t a requirement to live. If they are in your city or area (outside of rural), then you should advocate for better transit and urban design.

            Also note that I never said cars should be outright banned or anything of that sort