• DicJacobus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    13 days ago

    Valve bros dont need to worry about what happens in life after gaben, because I think gaben is going to ascend to cyberspace before the end.

    • hoch@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      13 days ago

      As someone losing control of their hands and enjoys playing video games, I very much look forward to this technology not only being available via Elon Musk.

      • CosmoNova@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        13 days ago

        And I see that but a game developer is not the right type of business to develop these kind of extremely intrusive and potentially dangerous accessibility devices. We need much stricter guidelines and oversight for this kind of tech before they essentially become a remote control for parts of our brain.

    • Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      14 days ago

      Some people are starting to wake up to the fact that the guy is just another libertarian billionaire, he just happens to be in charge of a company that made a product people love enough to give them monopolistic powers.

      • errer@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        13 days ago

        You’re not wrong, the downvoters are just sad because you are right. Just takes one personality shift from Gabe to turn him from beloved figurehead to shitty billionaire and being reminded of that sucks.

        • finitebanjo@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          12 days ago

          I think despite the claims that Gabe is a Libertarian, first spread by some blogger named Yanis V(?), are floating around the internet: he rarely makes a political statement but did endorse Joe Biden over Trump lending to the idea that he is NOT some sort of anarcho-syndicalist Republican-lite.

        • wewbull@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          13 days ago

          Pretty sure Musk has had a significant shift. Not saying he started out as a nice normal guy, but something cracked for sure.

          • toastmeister@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            13 days ago

            We also spend dramatically more now as well and are on an unsustainable path according to the Fed.

            People want more spending and less taxes though, as its human nature.

        • Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          13 days ago

          “one personality shift”

          That’s everyone dude. “Bernie Sanders is one personality shift away from being a Maga tech bro.”

          • Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            13 days ago

            Sanders doesn’t have control over (probably) thousands of the games you “own” or, if we’re honest, the PC gaming market as a whole.

        • Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          13 days ago

          If you just pay attention more than the average person you quickly realize that he’s already a shitty billionaire.

          Steam underage gambling profits him directly.

          He owns a yacht collection while his clients can’t afford to own the place they live in. How’s that for an environmental impact?

          His reaction to George Floyd wasn’t that Valve should release a statement at he considered that problematic, instead he gave each employee 10k to spend however they felt like. Where I used to work we used to call that a “shut the fuck up”. Employees are complaining about something? Here’s 10k each for them to shut the fuck up. Hell, they could spend that money to finance far right groups if they wanted, Newell didn’t care!

          Valve takes a 30% cut but Newell is a billionaire, which means they could afford to take a much smaller cut, he could have hundreds of millions instead and the devs could have more money in their pockets.

          • MajesticElevator@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            13 days ago

            I always get shat on for saying they do unregulated gambling, including to minors

            People be really defending Valve

              • MajesticElevator@lemmy.zip
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                13 days ago

                Eh, probably. They always state how competitors do this and that, and all the good Valve brought with Steam.

                Which is true, but they’re blinded by this. Google also brought a lot of good, and bad.

            • const_void@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              13 days ago

              People be really defending Valve

              They defend Microsoft and Windows for the same reason. It’s their beloved gaming platform

      • Rose@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        13 days ago

        I’m not even sure if it’s love. When something is all you’ve known, you just view everything else as strange and inferior. When you have so many games and have had so many experiences on Steam, the cognitive dissonance of accepting that Valve is quite problematic could be hard to bear. Knowing that everybody around you praises Steam, with many turning to rage or even harassment when they see competitors like Epic, the fear of being ostracized and ending up in the same position as those competitors is also a strong factor at play.

  • Killercat103@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    13 days ago

    I’d probably be a slow adopter tbh. Feel like such a chio you’d want to be quite trustworthy and reliably and proprietary software and hardware is not the moat trustworthy thing in the world.

    • Vanilla_PuddinFudge@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      12 days ago

      It would need to become a platform and standard unto itself.

      Which is to say, I’m not installing one until I can flash the firmware myself.

    • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      13 days ago

      Usually I am an earlier adopter of tech because I’m interested in technology, and I have money to burn. But I don’t need a brain chip, I’m weird enough already without having to debug my own head.

      • xavier666@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        13 days ago

        “Yes honey, I’m coming. Just one more thing to compile in my head”

        Segmentation fault

        • Killercat103@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          13 days ago

          Can I run Linux on it? Or better yet Gentoo? “You having a headache?” “Just compiling the system. Lending some brain power”

      • Vanilla_PuddinFudge@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        12 days ago

        three weeks after implant

        “I was completely wrong about this technology! Valve Mindtap is the best thing ever!”

        eyes stare 1000 yards into the distance while your true consciousness screams to be let out from the dark prison it has been trapped in

  • isaacd@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    13 days ago

    I think we all know where this is going.

    1. The Brainchip is trendy in Silicon Valley but doesn’t do much yet. The company says cyber-superintelligence will be available in a year, tops. Investors are pouring billions into it. Everyone says you need to hop on the trend now or you’ll be obsolete in six months.
    2. It’s been two years. The Brainchip still struggles to control a mouse or search Google. Everyone’s lost interest in building apps for it. Many users are reporting severe migraines, but the company says there’s nothing to worry about.
    3. The Brainchip pipes three unskippable ads directly to your optic nerve every time you go to the bathroom. Notifications ping your brain all day long. You can get it removed if you’ve got $80k to burn, but there’s a high risk of postoperative stroke.

    Yeah, no, I’m not putting anything in my brain that isn’t open-source from end to end. And even then probably nah.

            • Communist@lemmy.frozeninferno.xyz
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              12 days ago

              that’s where regulators step in, do you honestly believe elon musk would not be implanting healthy people with neuralinks if regulators would allow? They won’t, this is tech for people whose lives are so awful that not having one is worse than the things that may go wrong, for a very, very long time.

              • Vanilla_PuddinFudge@infosec.pub
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                edit-2
                12 days ago

                I didn’t think an old nazi with 32 felonies would be the leader of the free world, I’ve been surprised a few times in my life but nothing really does it anymore.

                Can you say your statement could hold up against 50 years of future trends? Transhumanism? Fanatics who want it so bad that they make it law?

                For that matter, who’s regulating Ai right now?

    • GreenKnight23@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      13 days ago

      the only way, and I mean the ONLY way I’ll put hardware in my brain is if I have resurrection level support like in Altered Carbon.

      the fear of losing my outward identity over the ability to live forever is worth losing.

    • bampop@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      13 days ago

      Why so pessimistic? With any luck brainchips will mean the end of annoying adverts once and for all. You’ll just feel an unexpected desire to acquire certain products. And maybe crippling headaches or a nauseating feeling of unease if you ignore these urges

  • qaz@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    13 days ago

    Props to him for trying it himself instead of having someone else do it and take all the risk

  • iAvicenna@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    13 days ago

    “has long toyed with the idea that your brain should be more connected to your PC”

    seems like billionaires’ wet dream to be honest

  • infinitesunrise@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    12 days ago

    The fact that most people would obviously never want to get a brain chip implant, combined with the fact that multiple billionaires are developing brain chip implants, indicates that there are plans in some circles to incentivize or coerce people into getting a brain chip implant at some point in the future.

    • Pennomi@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      12 days ago

      It’s risk/reward. If brain chips made me twice as productive or intelligent, I’d probably tolerate a lot more risk than if it was just a way to check my Instagram notifications without pulling out my phone.

      • infinitesunrise@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        12 days ago

        Productive or intelligent for whose benefit? If it’s so that you can perform better under wage labor conditions, that’s coercion.

    • AdrianTheFrog@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      12 days ago

      Medicine in the US is very expensive. There is a lot of money in helping with neurological conditions or paralysis.

    • Rin@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      12 days ago

      They’ve existed for awhile for people with certain disabilities and further advancements in the field would be great for the people who actually need them, but outside of that niche most people would likely not want to risk a highly invasive surgery and I don’t think they actually care about them.

    • RagingRobot@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      12 days ago

      What if you were going to die but you could live indefinitely if you got the implant? Would an incentive like that interest you?

  • TomB19@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    13 days ago

    I want to get one of the first implants possible. VR headsets are so unsightly.