• iAvicenna@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    6 days ago

    the world needs to urgently integrate

    • critical thinking
    • media interpretation
    • AI fundamentals
    • applied statistics

    courses into every school’s ciriculum starting from the age of ten to graduation, repeated yearly. Otherwise we are fucked.

    • cy_narrator@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      6 days ago

      Students are already stressed with their curriculum, by addimg these courses you are making them more stressed which increases the risk even more

      • Appoxo@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 days ago

        Replace the less sensical ones like religion classes.
        Nobody needs those. If you wamt to learn more about god and the world, I am sure the (local) church is more than willing to share.

        • zarkanian@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          5 days ago

          Comparative religions classes have value. It’s important to gain understanding into other people’s beliefs and to be able to compare and contrast them. If you’re only learning about one religion…not so much. Especially if it’s the religion you were brought up in.

          Going to church, on the other hand, is no substitute at all. You’re just being indoctrinated, full stop.

    • shiroininja@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 days ago

      Just teach kids that AI isn’t human and isn’t a replacement for humanity or human interaction of any kind.

      It’s clippy with a ginormous database. It’s cold blooded.

      • zarkanian@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 days ago

        Yes, I’m sure you’ll be able to convince kids that the new thing is bad because you say so, especially if you compare it to the antiquated mascot of a legacy word processor.

        • shiroininja@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          5 days ago

          It’s not about it being bad. It’s about expectations and reality. It’s not human. Can’t replace human emotion and thought. Just process data and give analysis.

          There is an emotional factor that goes into proper human decision making that is required. Or else half the human population would probably be suggested to be wiped out for some kind of cold, efficiency sake only a machine or psychopath can accept.

          Same goes with something like suicide and mental health/human relationships. I don’t trust a machine’s judgment on that.