Now I understand why at each windows 11 update, they introduce more bugs than ever

  • Auli@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 hours ago

    Is this why they haven’t said why they one folder needs to be there. They actually don’t know.

  • Bieren@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 hours ago

    Work for a big software company. With all the offshoring of devs, I expect most of our code is now AI. And it shows.

  • joelfromaus@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 hours ago

    This is my own experience but the past few years Windows has been extremely dependable for me and then in the last few months the updates they’ve have been terrible. I’ve seen more blue screens recently than I have in a lot of years.

    All this to say that if it is 30% AI code being used then it’s very telling!

    • themachinestops@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      6 hours ago

      Windows was always garbage to be honest, windows 7 was the best release in my opinion. You are correct though it is way worse these past months. By the way does your mouse lag when the update notification comes up?

      • lime!@feddit.nu
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 hours ago

        i had such a bad experience with 7, it was horribly unstable on a computer that had handled vista just fine. i switched to 8 as soon as i could and was better off for it.

  • infinitesunrise@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    13 hours ago

    Government spyware finally has a challenger for the title of “primary reason that most Microsoft software runs like hot garbage”.

  • Revan343@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    14 hours ago

    Year of the Linux desktop

    (Amusing sidenote: my autocomplete’s first suggestion after ‘Linux’ was ‘propaganda’.)

    • petrol_sniff_king@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 hours ago

      Microsoft CEO Satya Nadella said that 20% to 30% of code inside the company’s repositories was “written by software” — meaning AI.

      Nadella gave the figure after Zuckerberg asked roughly how much of Microsoft’s code is AI generated today.

      I highlighted part of the article for you.

  • WhatSay@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    17 hours ago

    So the CEO is trying to tell investors that they are saving money by not paying employees. But to me it sounds more like: we are letting our sub-par products continue to enshitify, and any other company using AI to program will be equal competition.

  • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    19 hours ago

    And 100% of their product names are generated by AI. No human would be stupid enough to change something’s name for zero reason.

    • Russ@bitforged.space
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      17 hours ago

      No human would be stupid enough to change something’s name for zero reason.

      Well, unless you’re a product manager at Google apparently… Though with them you’re lucky if its just a change of name rather than it becoming an entirely “new” thing, or just getting outright axed…